Development and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Holistic Ecological Health Promotion Model for Buddhist Monks: A Participatory Case Study in Kuti Cheevaphiban, Uttaradit Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
Noncommunicable diseases are significant health problems among Buddhist monks that require appropriate and sustainable health promotion approaches. This research aimed to (1) study health problems and needs of monks in Kuti Cheevaphiban, (2) develop a holistic ecological health promotion model for monks, and (3) evaluate the effectiveness of the developed model. This research and development study was conducted in three phases: Phase 1 investigated health problems and needs using mixed methods research with 200 quantitative samples and 41 qualitative informants. Phase 2 developed the model through participatory action research and expert consultation with 9 experts. Phase 3 implemented and evaluated the model's effectiveness using a one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with 38 monks. Research instruments included questionnaires, holistic well-being assessment forms, health behavior assessment forms, and health indicator records. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the paired t-tests. Phase 1 results showed that monks had multiple chronic diseases, particularly hypertension, diabetes, and overweight, and expressed needs for health promotion approaches integrating Buddhist principles, community participation, and environmental improvement in Kuti areas. Phase 2 results revealed that the developed model comprised six main components: principles, objectives, a five-step implementation process, four-dimensional main activities, stakeholder roles, and supporting factors. Expert evaluation of the model demonstrated the highest appropriateness level. Phase 3 results on model effectiveness indicated that after program participation, monks showed statistically significant improvements in all dimensions of holistic well-being, better health behaviors, and significantly improved health indicators. In conclusion, the holistic ecological health promotion model integrating the One Health concept, community participation, and the Buddhist principle was highly effective in promoting monks' well-being. Therefore, the model should be expanded and integrated with local health policies for sustainability.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความและรายงานวิจัยในวารสารพยาบาลกระทรวงสาธารณสุข เป็นความคิดเห็นของ ผู้เขียน มิใช่ของคณะผู้จัดทำ และมิใช่ความรับผิดชอบของสมาคมศิษย์เก่าพยาบาลกระทรวงสาธารณสุข ซึ่งสามารถนำไปอ้างอิงได้
References
Jeamjitvibool T, Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Noncommunicable diseases and social determinants of health in Buddhist monks: an integrative review. Research in Nursing & Health. 2022;45(2):249-260. doi:10.1002/nur.22215.
Ko-amornsup W, Tungmanee S, Thamrongsakul S, Pradit S, Surareungchai K, et al. Health survey of monks residing in urban areas: The Bangkok Noi model. Siriraj Medical Journal. 2024;76(11):705-13. doi:10.33192/smj.v76i11.269296.
Noo-in S, Khiewkhern S, Somdee T. Factors influencing preventive self-care behaviors to avert diabetes mellitus among Thai Buddhist monks: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health and Development. 2024;22(3):228-42. doi:10.55131/jphd/2024/220319.
Langgapin S, Boonchieng W, Chautrakarn S, Maneeton N, Senawan S. Development of a monk-led elderly mental health counseling program in Thai Buddhist communities. Religions. 2024;15(8):998. doi:10.3390/rel15080998.
Langgapin S, Maneeton N, Senawan S, Chautrakarn S, Boonchieng W. Effectiveness of the Buddhist-based elderly mental health counseling training program for Thai health volunteer monks. Religions. 2024;15(12):1472. doi:10.3390/rel15121472.
One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), Adisasmito WB, Almuhairi S, Behravesh CB, et al. One Health: a new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathogens. 2022;18(6):e1010537. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010537.
Zinsstag J, Bastos da Silva J, Degeling C, Kelly TR, Tschopp R, et al. One Health for a changing world: perspectives from The Lancet One Health Commission. The Lancet. 2023;401(10379):1979-81. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01595-1.
de la Rocque S, Adisasmito WB, Alvarez J, et al. One health systems strengthening in countries: tripartite tools and approaches at the human–animal–environment interface. BMJ Global Health. 2023;8(2):e011236. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011236.
de Diego-Cordero R, Martínez-Herrera A, Coheña-Jiménez M, Lucchetti G, Pérez-
Jiménez JM. Ecospirituality and health: a systematic review. Journal of Religion and Health. 2024;63(2):1285-1306. doi:10.1007/s10943-023-01994-2.
Balboni TA, VanderWeele TJ, Doan-Soares SD, Long KNG, Ferrell BR, et al. Spirituality in serious illness and health. JAMA. 2022;328(2):184-97. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.11086.
Kruk J, Jatrzebski T. Religion- and spirituality-based effects on health-related physical activity and well-being: A review. Religions. 2024;15(7):835. doi:10.3390/rel15070835.
Siah CJR, Urichuk L, Chenven M, et al. Nature-based interventions for mental health and wellbeing: a systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2023;32(4):1000-1018. doi:10.1111/inm.13131.
Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Lorenzo-Arribas A, et al. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: a conceptual framework. Environment International. 2021;150:106420. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420.
Menhas R, Shi J, Sun Y, et al. Nature-based social prescribing to promote health: a systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12:1228271. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1228271.
Zhang Y, Xie YJ, Yang L, Cheung K, Zhang Q, et al. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches in vaccination promotion: a scoping review. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2024;23:227. doi:10.1186/s12939-024-02278-1.
Esmaeilzadeh S, Mirzaei H, Keikavoosi-Arani L, Hosseininasab M, Rohollahi F. Facilitators and inhibitors of community engagement in public health initiatives: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0230217. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230217.
Wykes R, Burton E, O’Sullivan M, Hindocha S, Ryde GC, et al. Co-creating community-centred public health services: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(1):e0294901. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294901.
Cai WH, Wong PPY. Associations between incense-burning temples and respiratory mortality in Hong Kong. Atmosphere. 2021;12(6):774. doi:10.3390/atmos12060774.
Guo SE, Lin PC, Hsu HF, et al. Exposure to incense burning, biomarkers, and physical/mental health among temple workers and volunteers: a systematic review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(52):119113-119140. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29420-w.