Social and Human Infrastructure as the Foundation of the Creative Economy: Lessons from a Four-Star OTOP Women's Reed Mat Weaving Group
Keywords:
Social Infrastructure, Human Infrastructure, Creative Economy, Four-star OTOP productsAbstract
This research article aims to analyze the crucial role of social and human infrastructure as the foundation of creative infrastructure in fostering the creative economy. The study draws on qualitative fieldwork conducted among members of the Ban Phonsawan women’s reed mat weaving group, which holds a four-star rating under the One Tambon One Product (OTOP) project in Nikhom Phatthana Subdistrict, Bang Rakam District, Phitsanulok Province. Field data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and focus group discussions. The findings reveal that, although the group can produce four-star OTOP products at the community level, its production process remains vulnerable to fluctuations associated with the OTOP rating system. Moreover, the women’s reed mat weaving group faces limitations in developing knowledge related to product innovation, packaging design, market-responsive creative thinking, and the expansion of social networks beyond the village. Therefore, a key challenge in promoting the creative economy is bridging the gap between state- and market-driven creativity and local creativity. This can be achieved by strengthening the human and social infrastructure of producer groups, thereby enabling the OTOP project to generate sustainable income and improve the livelihoods of community members.
References
ประกาศกระทรวงมหาดไทย เรื่อง การกำหนดเขตตำบลในท้องที่อำเภอบางระกำ จังหวัดพิษณุโลก. (7 สิงหาคม 2544). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. เล่ม 118 ตอนที่ 63 ง. หน้า 7-43. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2544/D/063/7.PDF
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2544). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 9 (พ.ศ. 2545-2549). https://mhesi.nrct.go.th/archives/s/mhesi_archives/item/1235
สำนักงานส่งเสริมเศรษฐกิจสร้างสรรค์. (2562). รายงานการศึกษาการพัฒนาอุตสาหกรรมสร้างสรรค์ สาขางานฝีมือและหัตถกรรม. https://article.tcdc.or.th/uploads/media/2022/6/1/media_1-CEA-Crafts-Strategy-Final-Report.pdf
สำนักงานส่งเสริมเศรษฐกิจสร้างสรรค์. (2563). แผนปฏิบัติการด้านการส่งเสริมเศรษฐกิจสร้างสรรค์ ระยะที่ 1 (พ.ศ. 2563 - 2565). https://www.cea.or.th/storage/app/media/GOV/Thailand-Creative-Economy-Plan-Phrase%20I-2020-2023-TH.pdf
สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2566). แผนแม่บทภายใต้ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ (พ.ศ. 2566-2580).
Claymone, Y., & Jaiborisudhi, W. (2011). A study on one village one product project (OVOP) in Japan and Thailand as an alternative of community development in Indonesia. Thai Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(1), 51–62. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/easttu/article/download/51148/42369
Denpaiboon, C., & Amatasawatdee, K. (2012). Similarity and difference of One Village One Product (OVOP) for rural development strategy in Japan and Thailand. Japanese Studies Journal, 29 (Special Issue), 52-62. http://www.asia.tu.ac.th/journal/J_Studies55/10_vol29special_Chaweewan&Kochakorn.pdf
Enneking, G., Custers, G., & Engbersen, G. (2025). The rapid rise of social infrastructure: Mapping the concept through a systematic scoping review. Cities, 158, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105608
Essig, L. (2022). Creative infrastructure: Artists, money and entrepreneurial action. Intellect.
Jaiborisudhi, W. (2012). OVOP concept and community security in Thailand: Consistency and limitation. In Hiroshi Murayama (Ed.), Significance of the regional one product policy – How to use the OVOP/OTOP movements (pp. 25-38). The Policy Science Association of Ritsumeikan University.
Kurokawa, K. (2012). Promoting local creativity on OVOP/OTOP’s diversity. In Hiroshi Murayama (Ed.), Significance of the regional one product policy – How to use the OVOP/OTOP movements (pp. 1-13). The Policy Science Association of Ritsumeikan University.
Latham, A., & Layton, J. (2022). Social infrastructure: Why it matters and how urban geographers might study it. Urban Geography, 43(5), 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.2003609
Ponark, V., & Ahmad, M. M. (2025). One Tambon One Product (OTOP) implementation by the Thai Government. Development in Practice, 35(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2024.2408480
Son, K. (2011). Qualitative change of policy as a turning point towards local-oriented policy development. In Hiroshi Murayama (Ed.), The new paradigm of policy development in Thailand- What is conceived and how is it embodied in Rayong case? (pp. 205-219). Thammasat Printing House.
Strauf, S., & Scherer, R. (2010). The contribution of cultural infrastructure and events to regional development. 50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy”, 19-23 August 2010. Jonkoping, Sweden, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve.
Tanwattana, P. (2012). Differences between OTOP movement and non-OTOP movement: Roles of local leaders for self-reliance and regional development in Thailand. In Hiroshi Murayama (Ed.), Significance of the regional one product policy – How to use the OVOP/OTOP movements (pp. 53-74). The Policy Science Association of Ritsumeikan University.
Whitaker, F. (2017). The role of a lifetime: fostering peace and creativity, Interview with Forest Whitaker. In UNESCO, International fund for cultural diversity; Investing in creativity. Transforming societies (pp. 10-11). UNESC.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research and Development (JMARD)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.