Effects of Learning via Psychiatric Standardized Patients on Nursing students’ Knowledge and Self - Confidence in Therapeutic Communication: A pilot Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/jtnmc.v40i01.270236Keywords:
psychiatric standardized patients, therapeutic communication, knowledge, self – confidence, nursing studentsAbstract
Introduction The teaching and learning process of practicum courses in mental health and psychiatric nursing is different from other nursing fields. Nursing students need to use themselves as therapeutic tools through therapeutic communication, helping psychiatric patients understand their problems and develop their own problem-solving skills. This makes it impossible to learn and practice these skills through models in the learning resource center of nursing (LRC) like other nursing fields. Learning by using psychiatric standardized patients is an active learning approach. It involves individuals trained in role-playing to act as if they were actual patients, allowing nursing students to engage in communication and interaction with them. This approach stimulates students to be enthusiastic about learning, motivates them to pursue knowledge, and enables them to practice therapeutic communication skills. Students apply their knowledge in actual practice with psychiatric standardized patients with symptoms that resemble actual patients in a safe environment. Nursing students can actively participate in the learning process and practice nursing care on their own. They can repeat their practices multiple times without causing harm to actual patients, gradually developing confidence in their nursing practice.
Objectives This study aimed to: 1) compare knowledge and self-confidence in therapeutic communication within the experimental group before and after the program; 2) compare knowledge and self-confidence in therapeutic communication between the experimental group and the comparison group; and 3) compare the mean differences in knowledge and self-confidence in therapeutic communication between the experimental group and the comparison group.
Design This study employed a quasi–experimental design with a two–group pretest and posttest. It was based on Kolb’s experiential learning theory, which explains that the learning process involves the transformation of experience through four stages: 1) concrete experience, 2) reflective observation, 3) abstract conceptualization, and 4) active experimentation. These stages develop a learning cycle, which influences both knowledge and self-confidence in therapeutic communication.
Methodology This study comprised 60 undergraduate nursing students who completed the mental health and psychiatric nursing course during the 2023 academic year. According to the inclusion criteria, participants were purposively selected and assigned to either an experimental or comparison group, with each group consisting of 30 students. The comparison group received learning through therapeutic communication videos and content briefs by the instructor, while the experimental group received learning through the use of psychiatric standardized patients. The program included 1) the teaching plan utilizing psychiatric standardized patients, 2) psychiatric standardized patients, 3) the standardized patient reality evaluation form, 4) scenarios for standardized patients, and 5) the observation form for therapeutic communication with psychiatric standardized patient. Data collection instruments included 1) a questionnaire on therapeutic communication knowledge and 2) an assessment of self-confidence in therapeutic communication. Data were collected simultaneously from both the control and experimental groups. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics, Paired t-test and Independent t-test, and Mann Whitney U test.
Results Most participants in both the experimental and comparison groups were female (90.00% and 93.30%, respectively). The cumulative GPAs were not significantly different between the experimental (M = 3.19, SD = 0.35) and comparison group (M = 3.24, SD = 0.30), and the average GPAs for mental health and psychiatric nursing course were not significantly different (M = 2.62, SD=0.47; M = 2.63, SD=0.43, respectively). After the program, the experimental group showed knowledge (M = 13.10, SD = 2.23) higher than before the program (M = 10.83, SD = 1.64) with a statistical significance (t = -11.949, p<.001). Additionally, self-confidence in therapeutic communication in the experimental group (M = 20.97, SD = 2.87) was higher than before the program (M = 13.17, SD = 4.11) significantly (t = -17.357, p<.001). After the program, the comparison group had knowledge in therapeutic communication (M = 14.23, SD = 1.83) higher than the experimental group (M = 13.10, SD = 2.23) with a statistical significance (t = -2.149, p = .036); however, the mean difference in knowledge between the experimental and comparison groups was not significantly different (Z = -1.580, p > .05). After the program, the experimental group had self-confidence in therapeutic communication (M = 20.97, SD = 2.87) higher than the comparison group (M = 19.17, SD = 1.90) with a statistical significance (t = 2.866, p = .006) and the mean difference was greater than the comparison group (t = 4.088, p < .001).
Recommendation The results of this study indicate that learning with psychiatric standardized patients and using videos along with content briefs are equally effective in promoting knowledge in therapeutic communication. However, learning with psychiatric standardized patients was more effective than using videos with content briefs in enhancing nursing students’ confidence in therapeutic communication. In the teaching and learning process, nursing instructors and other related personnel can utilize psychiatric standardized patients to help develop self-confidence in therapeutic communication before practicing in real situations.
Downloads
References
Onsri P. The instructor’s role towards 21st century learning skills. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2016;19(3):8-13. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/47564/39429 (in Thai)
Pantaewan P. Development of student in the 21st century with active learning in nursing profession. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2016;17(3):17-24. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/73072/58764 (in Thai)
Norkaeo D. Simulation based learning for nursing education. Journal of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok. 2015;31(3):112-22. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bcnbangkok/article/view/56415/46992 (in Thai)
Humair J-P, Cornuz J. A new curriculum using active learning methods and standardized patients to train residents in smoking cessation. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(12):1023-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20732.x PMID: 14687261
Seybert AL, Kobulinsky LR, McKaveney TP. Human patient simulation in a Pharmacotherapy course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2): 1-37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2384212/ PMID: 18483603
Ince S. The effects of using standardized patients on nursing students’ head, neck and neurological examination skills, self-confidence and satisfaction. Cyprus J Med Sci. 2024; 9(2): 137-144. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-74
Kanungpiarn T, Mulalin T, Jiramanasawong A, Klaraeng W, Suratawon R. The development of blended learning model in mental health and psychiatric nursing for student nurse. The Journal of Boromrajonami College of Nursing, Suphanburi. 2024;7(1): 147-64. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SNC/article/view/269717 (in Thai)
Robkob W, Inchaithep S, Thinwang W. Development of learning outcomes based on learning and evaluation redesigned using standardized patient in simulation-based learning (SBL) in mental health and psychiatric nursing courses. Journal of Health Sciences Scholarship. 2022;9(1):229-52. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/johss/article/view/254666/173144 (in Thai)
Jai Z, Balinas JM. Teaching strategies in psychiatric nursing based on bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Cureus. 2024;16(4):1-5. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57759 PMID: 38590977
Sinthuchai S, Ubolwan K. Fidelity simulation based learning: implementation to learning and teaching management. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2017;18(1):29-38. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/85254 (in Thai)
Speeney N, Kameg KM, Cline T, Szpak JL, Bagwell B. Impact of a standardized patient simulation on undergraduate nursing student knowledge and perceived competency of the care of a patient diagnosed with schizophrenia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;32(6): 845-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.06.009 PMID: 30454626
Witt MA, McGaughan K, Smaldone A. Standardized patient simulation experiences improves mental health assessment and communication. Clin Sim Nurs. 2018;23:16-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.08.002
Kameg B, Fradkin D, Lee H. Effect of standardized patient simulation on nursing students’ attitudes toward psychiatric nursing and patients with mental health problems. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2021;59(8):15-21. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20210513-01 PMID: 34142918
Khamwong M, Kunlaka S, Sirimai W, Noochusuk C. Effect of simulation-based learning on self-confidence in therapeutic communication practice of nursing students. Journal of Health and Nursing Research. 2020;36(1):201-12. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bcnbangkok/article/view/241963 (in Thai)
Donovan LM, Mullen LK. Expanding nursing simulation programs with a standardized patient protocol on therapeutic communication. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019;38:126-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.05.015 PMID: 31276971
Liaw SY, Scherpbier A, Rethans J-J, Klainin-Yobas P. Assessment for simulation learning outcomes: a comparison of knowledge and self-reported confidence with observed clinical performance. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(6):35-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.006 PMID: 22064013
Blum CA, Borglund S, Parcells D. High-fidelity nursing simulation: impact on student self-confidence and clinical competence. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923x.2035 PMID: 20597857
Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1984. Available from: https://www.fullerton.edu/cice/_resources/pdfs/sl_documents/Experiential%20Learning%20-%20Experience%20As%20The%20Source%20Of%20Learning%20and%20Development.pdf
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavior, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 PMID: 17695343
Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data, 3rd ed. Hobeken (NJ): Wiley; 2019.
Lammeechai W. Plus-delta framework: workplace-based learning. SHEE J. 2022;3:25-8. Available from: https://shee.si.mahidol.ac.th/knowledge/ebook/2566/1-66/files/basic-html/page33.html (in Thai)
Becker KL, Rose LE, Berg JB, Park H, Shatzer JH. The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(4). https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060401-03 PMID: 16629278
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5): 489 - 97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147 PMID: 16977646
Doolen J, Giddings M, Johnson M, Guizado de Nathan G, O Badia L. An evaluation of mental health simulation with standardized patients. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014;11(1): 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2013-0075 PMID: 24620017
Cahyono BD, Zuhroidah I, Sujarwadi M. Effectiveness of standardized patients and role-play simulation methods in improving self-confidence and therapeutic communication skills of nursing students. Nurse and Health: Jurnal Keperawatan. 2020;9(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.36720/nhjk.v9i1.128
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



