Factors Predicting Quality of Bowel Preparation in Monks Undergoing Colonoscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/jtnmc.v40i01.271318Keywords:
colonoscopy, quality of bowel preparation, bowel preparation, monksAbstract
Introduction Colonoscopy is an important procedure for diagnosing colorectal cancer. It involves crucial preparation steps, particularly cleaning the colon to free of feces and fecal fluid. This ensures the accuracy of the diagnosis, allowing clear images of the mucosa, polyps, or cancerous lesions inside the colon. Proper preparation also helps minimize potential side effects or complications. Monks receive alms from the public, which can affect the type of food they consume and, consequently, their ability to prepare their colon for the procedure. Quality of bowel preparation is critical, as an inadequate bowel preparation can result in an incomplete procedure and may lead to a rescheduled appointment for a repeat examination. However, simply scheduling monks for hospital stay in advance for bowel preparation may not be sufficient to ensure proper bowel preparation for the colonoscopy.
Objectives This study aimed to 1) describe the quality of bowel preparation in monks undergoing colonoscopy, and 2) investigate predictive factors of bowel preparation quality in monks undergoing colonoscopy, including the risk of constipation, pre-operative risks (American Society of Anesthesiologists status classification, ASA class), and dietary fiber intake.
Design This study employed a predictive correlational design using Roy’s Adaptation Model as a conceptual framework for the preparation of colonoscopy. The process involves inputs through physiological control mechanisms related to bowel movement regulation and nutritional adaptation to modify the dietary intake in order to reduce fiber in the gastrointestinal system. This entire process collectively influences the quality of bowel preparation.
Methodology The participants consisted of 199 monks at a hospital for a colonoscopy between April 2021 and January 2023. They were selected using a purposive sampling based on inclusion criteria: being 20 years or older, undergoing colonoscopy for screening, diagnosis, treatment, or post-surgical follow-up. Those 60 years and older must have a normal cognitive function screened with a Mini-Cog score of > 3. Exclusion criteria included a history of psychiatric disorders, difficulty swallowing, bowel obstruction or occlusion, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel or gastrointestinal resection, and any anatomical abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract. The research instruments included a Mini-Cog test for screening cognitive impairment, a personal information questionnaire, a clinical information questionnaire, and a constipation risk assessment tool, which had a content validity index (CVI) of .83 and a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .93. Additionally, there was a food intake questionnaire prior to the colonoscopy, with a CVI of 1.00, an ASA class pre-operative risk assessment form, and the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) with an inter-rater reliability (IRR) of .85. Data were collected through structured interviews and medical record reviews. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis, and logistic regression was employed to analyze predictive factors for bowel preparation quality in monks undergoing colonoscopy, with a significance level set at .05.
Results The participants of 199 monks who underwent colonoscopy had a mean age of 60.8 years (SD = 8.9), with the majority of older adults (66.8%). Approximately 40.2% of them had body mass index (BMI) ranging from 23.00 - 24.99 kg/m², with a mean BMI of 24.2 kg/m² (SD = 1.90). Of the participants, 38.2% had a history of smoking, with a mean smoking duration of 30.00 years (SD = 8.47). Additionally, 27.1% had a history of tea consumption, with a mean duration of 20.00 years (SD = 6.46), while 33.2% had a history of coffee consumption, with a mean duration of 19.00 years (SD = 6.72). Furthermore, 61.8% reported engaging in physical activity. Analysis of clinical data revealed that 44.7% of the 199 participants had underlying medical conditions, with the most common being hypertension (25.1%), followed by gastrointestinal diseases (18.1%). A total of 37.2% had a history of regular medication use, with the most common for antihypertensive medications (23.1%). The most frequently prescribed laxative was Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) at 98.5%. The majority of participants (90.5%) underwent the colonoscopy in the morning on their scheduled appointment day. According to the BBPS, 77.4 % of them had good quality of bowel preparation at a mean of 7.83 (SD=1.83). Logistic regression analysis showed constipation risk (OR 3.496, 95%CI: 2.575 – 7.046, p < .01), ASA class (OR 3.766, 95% CI.:3.508 – 7.239, p < .01) and dietary fiber intake (OR 5.461, 95% CI: 4.921– 8.578, p < .01) together predicted quality of bowel preparation in monks undergoing colonoscopy. These factors can jointly predict the quality of bowel preparation among monks undergoing colonoscopy at 71.3% (Nagelkerke R2=.713, p < .05).
Recommendation Nurses can use the study findings to plan strategies for promoting bowel preparation in monks undergoing colonoscopy by assessing pre-operative risk, the risk of constipation, and dietary fiber intake prior to the procedure. Future studies could explore additional factors, such as stool characteristics during bowel preparation and regular medications. Additionally, research could focus on providing guidance and follow-up evaluations, particularly regarding low-fiber diet recommendations during the 3 days prior to hospital admission for effective bowel preparation.
Downloads
References
Bechtold ML, Mir F, Puli SR, Nguyen DL. Optimizing Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Guide to Enhance Quality of Visualization. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29(2):137-46. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0005 PMID: 27065725
American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts and Figures 2017-2019. American Cancer Society [internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures/colorectalcancer-facts-and-figures-2017-2019.pdf
Kahi CJ, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, et al. Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:489-98.e10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.001 PMID: 26892199
Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, Spada C, Benamouzig R, Bisschops R, et al. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51(8):775-94. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0959-0505 PMID: 31295746
Sulz MC, Kröger A, Prakash M, Manser CN, Heinrich H, Misselwitz B. Meta-analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0154149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154149 PMID: 27257916
Yadlapati R, Johnston ER, Gregory DL, Ciolino JD, Cooper A, Keswani RN. Predictors of Inadequate Inpatient Colonoscopy Preparation and Its Association with Hospital Length of Stay and Costs. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3482-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3761-2 PMID: 26093612
Hsu CM, Lin WP, Su MY, Chiu CT, Ho YP, Chen PC. Factors that Influence Cecal Intubation Rate During Colonoscopy In Deeply Sedated Patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:76-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06795.x PMID: 21649720
Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The Impact of Suboptimal Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Miss Rates and The Factors Associated with Early Repeat. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1207-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051 PMID: 21481857
Fang J, Fu HY, Ma D, Wang D, Liu YP, Wang YF, et al. Constipation, Fiber Intake and Non-compliance Contribute to Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Dig Dis. 2016;17:458-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12376 PMID: 27356275
Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30:819-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000001175 PMID: 29847488
Almadi MA, Alharbi O, Azzam N, Altayeb M, Thaniah S, Aljebreen A. Bowel Preparation Quality Between Hospitalized Patients and Outpatient Colonoscopies. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:93-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_485_17 PMID: 29637916
Zhang Y, Wang L, Wu W, Zhang S, Zhang M, She W, et al. Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Older Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Review and Meta-analysis. Int.J.Nurs. Stud. 2024;149:104631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104631 PMID: 37963423.
Bhanthumkomol P, Siramolpiwat S, Vilaichone RK. Incidence and Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation Before Elective Colonoscopy in Thai Patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:10763-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.24.10763 PMID: 25605172
Attaworakun S, Ngamdee N, Cherdsuntia V. Monk’s Health in Urban Area: The Problem that Should be Considered. Vajira Med J [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Feb 10]; S177-S184. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/VMED/article/view/204684 (in Thai)
Ministry of Public Health. Department of Medical Services. Priest Hospital. Anesthetic Record Statistics: Priest Hospital. 2023.
Roy C, Whetsell MV, Frederickson K. The Roy Adaptation Model and Research. Nurs Sci Q. 2009;22(3):209-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318409338692 PMID: 19694080
Sharma A, Rao S. Constipation: Pathophysiology and Current Therapeutic Approaches. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;239:59-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2016_111 PMID: 28185025
Moen S, Vuik FER, Voortman T, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Predictors of Gastrointestinal Transit Times in Colon Capsule Endoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022;13(6):e00498. https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000498 PMID: 35584543
Trongsakul S, Lambert R, Clark A, Wongpakaran N, Cross J. Development of the Thai Version of Mini-Cog, A Brief Cognitive Screening Test. Geriatr Gerontol [internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Feb 10]; 15(5): 594-600. https:// doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12318 PMID: 25155468
Hinrichs M, Huseboe J, Tang JH, Titler MG. Research-based Protocol: Management of Constipation. J Gerontol Nurs. 2001;27(2):17-28. https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-20010201-11 PMID: 11915262
Budpanya W, Putwatana P, Wongvatunyu S, Khwanruean P. Effect of a Constipation Prevention Program for Neurological Patients [Dissertation]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 2012 (in Thai)
Doyle DJ, Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/
Calderwood AH, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, Jacobson BC. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Scores Provide a Standardized Definition of Adequate for Describing Bowel Cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(2):269-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.031 PMID: 24629422
Kittiyanmetee P, Subraungthong W, Suksumraj S. Promoting Holistic Health Care of The monks in Lopburi. RJPJ [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Feb 10]. Available from: Promoting Holistic Health Care of The monks in Lopburi | Rajapark Journal (tci-thaijo.org) (in Thai)
Tunsakul C, Pumrew R, Rojanawipak p. Self- care and Food Consumption Behavior of the Monks in Taweewattana District, JPHC [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Feb 10];38(1). Available from: Factors Related to Health Behaviors of Monks in Fang District, Chiangmai | Journal of Nurses Association of Thailand Northern Office (tci-thaijo.org) (in Thai)
Fuccio L, Frazzoni L, Spada C, Mussetto A, Fabbri C, Manno M, et al. Factors that Affect Adequacy of Colon Cleansing for Colonoscopy in Hospitalized Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(2):339-48. e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.055 PMID: 32200083
Pereyra L, Cimmino D, González Malla C, et al. Colonic Preparation Before Colonoscopy in Constipated and Non-constipated Patients: A Randomized Study. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(31):5103-5110. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5103 PMID: 23964144
Beran A, Aboursheid T, Ali AH, Albunni H, Mohamed MF, Vargas A, et al. Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003073 PMID: 39225554
Gandhi K, Tofani C, Sokach C, Patel D, Kastenberg D, Daskalakis C. Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(3):357-69.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016 PMID: 28826680
Ko-amornsup W, Siriussawakul A, Aosangdeeku K, Preedachitkul R, Srinonprasert V, Somnuke P, Muangpaisan W, Petchthai P, Kitnarong N. Health Survey of Monks Residing in Urban Areas: The Bangkok Noi Model. Siriraj Med J [Internet]. 2024.[cited 2024 Dec 7]; 76(11):746-57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i11.269296
Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, et al. A Predictive Model Identifies Patients Most likely to have Inadequate Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10: 501-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037 PMID: 22239959
Nam SJ, Kim YJ, Keum B, Lee JM, Kim SH, Choi HS, et al. Impact of Diet Restriction on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e12645. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000012645 PMID: 30313052
Chen E, Chen L, Wang F, Zhang W, Cai X, Cao G. Low-residue Versus Clear Liquid Diet Before Colonoscopy: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(49):e23541. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000023541 PMID: 33285772
Avalos DJ, Sussman DA, Lara LF, Sarkis FS, Castro FJ. Effect of Diet Liberalization on Bowel Preparation. South. Med J. 2017;110(6):399-407. https://doi.org/10.14423/smj.0000000000000662 PMID: 28575897
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



