Learning Needs and Barriers to Accessing Sexual Health Services among Adolescents: A Descriptive Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/jtnmc.v40i4.274900Keywords:
learning needs, access barriers, sexual health, adolescents, qualitative researchAbstract
Introduction Adolescent sexual health during the transitional phase from childhood to adulthood represents a critical issue requiring heightened attention particularly in an era marked by rapid information exchange and prevailing societal attitudes that remain resistant to comprehensive sex education. Despite ongoing efforts to promote sexual education and expand youth-friendly health services, access remains constrained by a constellation of factors at the personal, family, school, and health services system levels. These challenges are especially pronounced within the cultural context of Northern Thailand, where traditional values continue to shape perceptions and practices surrounding sexuality. Understanding adolescents’ learning needs and the barriers they face in accessing services through the perspectives of multiple stakeholders is essential for designing interventions appropriately.
Objectives This study aimed to 1) describe perceptions regarding the learning needs, barriers, and access to sexual health services among adolescents of reproductive age within Health Region 2, 2) explore perceptions of sexual communication with children and adolescents, as perceived by students, teachers, and parents, and 3) study perceptions and proposed strategies for developing youth-friendly sexual health services, based on perceptions of students and public health personnel.
Design This study employs a descriptive qualitative research design, grounded in the constructivist/ interpretivist paradigms, to explore the perceptions and perspectives of multiple stakeholders regarding adolescent sexual health. The researchers applies a health service development framework including 3 components: 1) learning needs, 2) barriers to service access, and 3) stakeholder experiences and perceptions. Additionally, the study employs the concepts of positive sexual health approach and youth-friendly services as theoretical foundations.
Methodology This study was conducted within Health Region 2, including five provinces: Phitsanulok, Phetchabun, Tak, Sukhothai, and Uttaradit, between September 2022 and June 2023. Informants were selected through purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques, resulting in a total of 100 informants. These included 50 students in late primary and early secondary education (aged 9–15 years), 20 parents, 15 teachers, and 15 public health personnel. Instruments for data collection comprised semi-structured interview guides, focus group discussion protocols, non-participatory observation forms, and personal information recording sheets. The data were gathered through 50 in-depth interviews, 8 focus group discussions, and non-participatory observations conducted at 15 sites. Content analysis was conducted following the approach outlined by Elo and Kyngäs, utilizing NVivo 12 software. Trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, triangulation across data sources, researchers, and methods, and researcher reflexivity.
Results The data analysis revealed three major themes aligned with the study’s objectives. First, Learning Needs: Students’ learning needs regarding sexual health were categorized into five sub-themes: 1) physical changes and self-care, 2) relationship and communication skills, 3) sexual protection and safety, 4) safe technology and online media use, and 5) sexual diversity and acceptance. Among students who had previously accessed health services, four areas for service improvement were identified: enhancing service delivery processes, developing modern educational media, expanding online platforms, and providing training for service providers. Barriers to accessing information and services consisted of four main categories: attitude and belief-related barriers (3 subcategories), barriers to accessing accurate information (4 subcategories), health system-related barriers (5 subcategories), and family and school-related barriers (3 subcategories). Second, Perceptions of Sexual Communication: Students perceived that parents and teachers lacked confidence in discussing sexual topics. Teachers reported feeling unprepared and lacking communication skills, while parents expressed concerns that such discussions might stimulate curiosity and acknowledged their own limited access to up-to-date knowledge. Third, Perceptions of Current Services and Recommendations for Youth-Friendly Development: Students perceived existing services as unfriendly and judgmental. Public health personnel reported constraints in time and specialized skills. Recommendations for developing youth-friendly services, as identified across stakeholder groups, included four key areas: 1) improving service environments and processes, 2) enhancing personnel capacity, 3) integrating innovation and technology, and 4) fostering networks and collaborative partnerships.
Recommendation Based on the findings, five key recommendations are proposed: 1) Develop an integrated sex education curriculum that incorporates content on evaluating online information and understanding sexual diversity, 2) Establish concrete youth-friendly sexual health services, including dedicated youth clinics, digital counseling applications, and flexible service hours, 3) Create cross-sectoral coordination mechanisms, such as district-level youth sexual health committees and digital referral systems, 4) Enhance parental capacity for sexual communication through tiered communication training programs and peer support groups, and 5) Foster sustainable community engagement by establishing community learning centers and networks of local leaders. This research contributes new knowledge on the diverse and emerging needs of adolescents in the digital era and serves as a foundational resource for policy development and practice that genuinely responds to the lived realities of the target population.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Adolescent health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 [cited 2024 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs. Data and statistics on adolescent sexual and reproductive health [Internet]. Washington (DC): HHS; 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 17]. Available from: https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health/data-and-statistics-on-adolescent-sexual-andreproductive-health
Phantra T, Rattananupong T, Saejeng K, Jiamjarasrangsi W. Modeling and mapping of contextual factors associated with adolescent birth rates in Thailand between 2009 and 2018. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1060. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1288902522327w. PMID: 40108554
ChandraMouli V, Plesons M, Barua A, Mohan A, MellesBrewer M, Engel DMC. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights: a stocktaking and calltoaction on the 25th anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 2019;27(1):1676006. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1676006 PMID: 31701814.
Wungrath J, Phrommasen P, Ritthimon W. Addressing the teen mom situation in Thailand: a systematic review on challenges, initiatives and recommendations for improvement. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia. 2024; 27(3):129–45. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v27i3.1242
Sidamo NB, Kerbo AA, Gidebo KD, Wado YD. Socio‑ecological analysis of barriers to access and utilization of adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Sub‑Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review. Open Access J Contracept. 2023; 14:103-18. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S411924 PMID: 37398897
Leekuan P, Kane R, Sukwong P, Kulnitichai W. Understanding sexual and reproductive health from the perspective of late adolescents in northern Thailand: a phenomenological study. Reprod Health. 2022; 19(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01528-1 PMID: 36564833
Mason-Jones AJ, Crisp C, Momberg M, Koech J, De Koker P, Mathews C. A systematic review of the role of school-based healthcare in adolescent sexual, reproductive, and mental health. Syst Rev. 2012;1:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-49 PMID: 23098138
Cassidy C, Bishop A, Steenbeek A, Langille D, MartinMisener R, Curran J. Barriers and enablers to sexual health service use among university students: a qualitative descriptive study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COMB model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):581. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3379-0 PMID: 300 41649
ChandraMouli V, Svanemyr J, Amin A, Fogstad H, Say L, Girard F, Temmerman M. Twenty years after the International Conference on Population and Development: where are we with adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights? J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jan;56(1 Suppl):S1–S6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.015 PMID: 25528975
Sandelowski M. What’s in a Name? Qualitative Description Revisited. Research Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362 PMID: 20014004
Tangmunkongvorakul A, Carmichael G, Banwell C, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Coital experience among adolescents in three socialeducational groups in urban Chiang Mai, Thailand. Asian Popul Stud. 2012;8(1): 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2012.646837 PMID: 22754584; PMCID: PMC 3380584
Wiwatkamonchai A, Mesukko J, Klunklin P, Fongkaew W. Youths’ perceptions regarding access to sexual and reproductive health services. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2023;27(1):121–37. https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2023.260337
Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Bhutta ZA. Review of nutrition guidelines relevant for adolescents in low and middleincome countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Apr;1393(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13332 PMID: 28436099
Levesque JF, Harris MF, Russell G. Patientcentred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18 PMID: 23496984
Nair M, Baltag V, Bose K, BoschiPinto C, Lambrechts T, Mathai M. Improving the quality of health care services for adolescents, globally: a standardsdriven approach. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(3):288–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.011. PMID: 26299556
Haynes A, Loblay V. Rethinking barriers and enablers in qualitative health research: limitations, alternatives, and enhancements. Qualitative Health Research. 2024 Dec; 34(14):1371–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241230890 PMID: 38459909
Vasconcelos P, Carrito ML, QuintaGomes AL, Patrão AL, Nóbrega CAP, Costa PA, et al. Associations between sexual health and wellbeing: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Nov 4;102873-887D. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.291565
Crocker BCS, Pit SW, Hansen V, JohnLeader F, Wright ML. A positive approach to adolescent sexual health promotion: a qualitative evaluation of key stakeholder perceptions of the Australian Positive Adolescent Sexual Health (PASH) Conference. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):681. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6993-9 PMID: 31159767.
United Nations Population Fund. Adolescent and youth‑friendly health services [Internet]. New York: UNFPA; 2014 [cited 2024 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/resources/adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health
National Statistical Office of Thailand. Population and Housing Census 2020 [Internet]. Bangkok: National Statistical Office; 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.nso.go.th (in Thai)
Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semistructured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Dec;72(12):2954-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031 PMID: 2722 1824
Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. PMID:18352969
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1985. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Haberland N, Rogow D. Sexuality education: emerging trends in evidence and practice. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1 Suppl):S15–S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.013 PMID: 25528976
McCormack M, Wignall L, Morris M. Gay guys using gay language: friendship, shared values and the intentcontexteffect matrix. Br J Sociol. 2016;67(4): 747–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12203 PMID: 27412064
Hirst J. Developing sexual competence? Exploring strategies for the provision of effective sexualities and relationships education. Sex Educ. 2008;8(4): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810802433929
Bacchus LJ, Reiss K, Church K, Colombini M, Pearson E, Naved R, et al. Using digital technology for sexual and reproductive health: are programs adequately considering risk? Global Health: Science and Practice. 2019;7(4):507-14. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00239
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



