Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation in Colorectal Disease Patients undergoing Abdominal Surgery

Main Article Content

ธมลวรรณ ยอดกลกิจ
นิโรบล กนกสุนทรรัตน์
รังสิมา เที่ยงเธียรธรรม

Abstract

The study on the implementation of clinical practice guideline (CPG) in patients with colorectal disease undergone abdominal surgery was done by using the
CNPG developed based on the literature reviews. The samples were: 32 patients with colorectal diseases who undergone abdominal surgery; and 22 personnel including 5 surgeons, 15 nurses, and 2 practical nurses at a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok. Data were collected during November 2016 - March 2017. Research instruments developed by the researchers included: personal data interviewing form; clinical outcome record forms, patients’ satisfaction questionnaire, personnel satisfaction questionnaire, personnel adherence to CPG records, and perception of nurses’ ability to implement the CPG in caring for the patients. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical testing. Results revealed that most of the patients had colorectal cancer. Patients’ outcomes: the implementation of the CPG resulting in length of hospital stay shortening for 2 days, having no incidence of urinary tract infection, and having no reoperation and no readmission within 28 days after discharge. However, infection rates at the surgical sites were not decreased. The patients were most satisfied with: surgeon’ courteous, surgeon’s performing physical examination, and nurse’ caring and helping manners. Personnel’s outcomes: They were satisfied with the CPG at high level and were 100 % adhered to the CPG. Most of nurses perceived their ability to care for the patients. Implementation of the CPG could improve outcomes of patients as well as personnel.

Article Details

How to Cite
ยอดกลกิจ ธ., กนกสุนทรรัตน์ น., & เที่ยงเธียรธรรม ร. (2018). Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation in Colorectal Disease Patients undergoing Abdominal Surgery. Thai Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Practice, 5(1), 94–111. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/apnj/article/view/131565
Section
Research report

References

1. American Cancer Society: Colorectal Cancer Facts and Figures. [https://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/ content/@nho/documents/document/f861708 finalforwebpdf.pdf].

2. Tuca A, Guell E, Martinez-Losada E, Codorniu N. Malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients: epidemiology, management, and factors influencing spontaneous resolution. Cancer Manag Res 2012;4:159-69.

3. Beyer-Berjot L, Patel V, Ziprin P, Taylor D, Berdah S, Darzi A, et al. Enhanced recovery simulation in colorectal surgery: Design of virtual online patients.
Surg Endosc 2014.

4. National Cancer Institute Registration Office. Annual Report 2012. Available from: www.nci.go.th/ th/File_download/D_index/annual_report_2012. pdf. (In Thai)

5. Faculty of Medicine, Vajira hospital performance statistics 2557 - 2558. Available from: https:// www2.vajira.ac.th /vjrlib/?page_id=113. (In Thai)

6. Cakir H, van Stijn MF, Lopes Cardozo AM, Langenhorst BL, Schreurs WH, van der Ploeg TJ, et al. Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and length of
stay after colonic resection. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 2013;15(8):1019-25.

7. Performance statistics of the fiscal year 2015; 2015. Available from: https://intra.vajira.ac.th (In Thai)

8. Donabedian A. An introduction to quality assurance in health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

9. Abraham N, Albayati S. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections. World J Gastrointest Surg 2011;3(1):1-6.

10. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York;2003.

11. Intarasombat P. Assessment of health status in the elderly. Ramathibodi Nursing Journal 1996; 2(3):44-56. (In Thai)

12. Duangchan C. Effect of gum chewing on bowel motility in colorectal cancer patients after open colorectal resection [thesis]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 2013. (In Thai)

13. The Royal College of Physicians of Thailand (RCPT). Instruction on clinical practice guideline development. Royal College Physician of Thailand Newsletter 2001;18(6): 36-47. (In Thai)

14. Waewwanjit D. The development and evaluation of clinical nursing practice guideline for fever management in patients with traumatic brain injury, SongklaNagarind hospital. SongkhlaNagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University; 2011. (In Thai)

15. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; (16):297-334.

16. Ministry of Labor. New minimum wage according to the wage board›s announcement on minimum wage (No.8) 2017 [updated 22 November 2016. Available
from: https://www.mol.go.th/employee/interesting_information/ 4131. (In Thai)

17. Qu H, Liu Y, Bi DS. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy. 2015;29(12):3608-17.

18. Steven D, Wexner JW. Fleshman colon and rectal surgery abdominal operations. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.

19. Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D. Antibiotic prophylaxis and incisional surgical site infection following colorectal cancer surgery: an analysis of 330 cases. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2009;92(1):12-6.

20. Herzberg F. Work and the nature of man. ed, editor. London: Crosby Lockwook Staples; 1968.

21. Chomsai T. Nursing record competency of professional nurses in in-pateint department of Somdejprapinklao Hospital. Somdejprapinklao Hospital: Mahidol
University. (In Thai)