Effects of a Nurse–led Rehabilitation Program on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Upper GI Cancers Undergoing Surgery

Main Article Content

Tatsanee Junorn
Nirobol Kanogsunthornrat
Pitichote Hiranathep

Abstract

This one group pretest –posttest research design examined the effect of rehabilitation program in surgical patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer on body weight, albumin level, postoperative complications, days of hospital stay, and quality of life after discharge. The rehabilitation program integrated the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) and Orem’s supportive educative nursing system as the conceptual framework. The study sample was 12 esophageal cancer patients and 8 gastric cancer patients. They received the rehabilitation program at least 1 week before surgery, during hospital stay, and after 30 days of hospital discharge. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Friedman’s test, and Wilcoxon Signed-rank test.  Results showed that most of the patients gained their weights and albumin levels on both at one day before surgery and at 30 days after hospital discharge.  Eight postoperative complications were found. Most complications found in the samples with esophagel cancer were pulmonary complications and chyle leakage, while intestinal obstruction was found the most in samples with gastric cancer. The numbers of hospital stay were 18.60 ± 10.89 days. The patients with esophageal cancer had the number of hospital stay less than the patients with gastric cancer (17.33 ± 7.30 days vs. 20.50 ± 9.45 days). Ninety percents of the patients could completely perform the programme activities. The quality of life after surgery, EORTC QLQ –OG25 mean score, was in a good level. These revealed that the program help improve nutritional status of patients with upper GI cancer before and after surgery, and the quality of life after surgery.

Article Details

How to Cite
Junorn, T., Kanogsunthornrat, N., & Hiranathep, P. (2021). Effects of a Nurse–led Rehabilitation Program on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Upper GI Cancers Undergoing Surgery. Thai Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Practice, 8(1), 75–95. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/apnj/article/view/252899
Section
Research report

References

1. Akiyama Y, Iwaya T, Endo F, Shioi Y, Kumagai M, Takahara T, et al. A.. Effectiveness of intervention with a perioperative multidisciplinary support team for radical esophagectomy. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25(12): 33-9.
2. Chen FF, Huang DD, Lu J X, Zhou CJ, Zhuang CL, Wang SL, et al. Feasibility of total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer and predictive factors for Its short- and long-term outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20(3): 21-30.
3. Nederlof N, Slaman AE, van Hagen P, van der Gaast A, Slankamenac K, Gisbertz S S, et al. Using the Comprehensive Complication Index to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on complication severity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncolo 2016; 23(12): 64-71.
4. Liu G, Jian F, Wang X, Chen L. Fast-track surgery protocol in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Onco Targets Ther 2016; 9: 45-51.
5. Sahoo MR, Gowda MS, Kumar AT. Early rehabilitation after surgery program versus conventional care during perioperative period in patients undergoing laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy. J Minim Access Surg 2014; 10(3): 132-8.
6. Karran A, Wheat J, Chan D, Blake P, Barlow R, Lewis WG. Propensity Score analysis of an enhanced recovery programme in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2016; 40(7): 45-54.
7. Medical Statistics Unit, Ramathibodi Hospital. Statistic of Surgery Patients with Upper GI Cancers, (2015). Bangkok: Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital. Mahidol University.(In Thai)
8. Bu J, Li N, Huang X, He S, Wen J, Wu X. Feasibility of fast-track surgery in elderly patients with gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19(8): 91-8.
9. Hanucharornkul, S. Self-care and Orem’s theory.In S. Hanucharornkul (Ed.), Nursing: Science of practice (2nd ed.). 2001; Bangkok: V.J. Printing.(In Thai)
10. Timmerman H, de Groot JF, Hulzebos HJ, de Knikker R, Kerkkamp H E, van Meeteren NL. Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of preoperative therapeutic exercise in patients with cancer: a pragmatic study. Physiother Theory Prac, 2011; 27(2): 17-24.
11. Park J, Lee JM, Lee JS, Cho YJ. Pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis in critically Ill patients: a network meta-analysis of 12 trials. J Korean Med Sci 2016; 31(11): 28-37.
12. Findlay JM, Tustian E, Millo J, Klucniks A, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, et al. The effect of formalizing enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with a protocol. Dis Esophagus 2015;28(6): 67-73.
13. Orathai P, Pumonsakul S. (2013). Power analysis and sample size estimation using G*Power Program. ( 1st edition). Bangkok : Phimvadee 39. (In Thai)
14. Gatenby PA, Shaw C, Hine C, Scholtes S, Koutra M, Andrew H, et al. Retrospective cohort study of an enhanced recovery programme in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015; 97(7): 2-7.
15. Nakaphongse A. Physical status, depression, nutritional self-care, and nutritional status of the community dwelling elderly.[Dissertation]. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 1996.(In Thai)
16. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 2017; 36(3):23-50.
17. Lagergren P, Fyers P, Canray T, Stein H. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OG25, to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer of the oesophagus, the oesophago-gastric junction and the stomach. EJC 2007; 43(14):2066-73
18. Yu-Wei L, Fan-Wei Y, Dong-Lin T, Hsien-Pin L, Yen-Lung L, Hung-Hsing C, et al. Expedite recovery from esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after perioperative management protocol reinvention. J Thorac Dis 2017;9(7): 29-37.
19. Yamada T, Hayashi T, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Taniguchi H, Fukushima R, et al. Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery. Gastric Cancer 2012;15(1): 34-41.
20. Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Wang ZM, Li JS. Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010; 34(3): 13-21.
21. Parise P, Ferrari C, Cossu A, Puccetti F, Elmore U, De Pascale S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in Esophagectomy: Is a reasonable prediction of Hospital stay possible? Ann Surg 2019; 270(1): 77-83.
22. Labgaa I, Joliat G-R, Kefleyesus A, Mantziari S, Schäfer M, Demartines N, et al. Is postoperative decrease of serum albumin an early predictor of complications after major abdominal surgery? A prospective cohort study in a European centre. BMJ Open 2017; 7(4), e013966.
23. Wang D, Kong Y, Zhong B, Zhou X, & Zhou Y. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized comparison with conventional postoperative care. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14(4): 20-27.
24. Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Sato T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Ogata T, et al. Equivalent feasibility and safety of perioperative care by ERAS in open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institution ancillary study using the patient cohort enrolled in the JCOG0912 phase III trial. Gastric Cancer 2019; 22(3): 17-23.
25. Bowrey DJ, Baker M, Halliday V, Thomas A L, Pulikottil-Jacob R, Smith K. Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 1-9.