Nursing Care for Adults with Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Evidence-Based Approaches and Critical Nursing Roles
Keywords:
Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing Care, SepsisAbstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency with high morbidity and mortality, particularly when recognition and treatment are delayed. Disease progression may lead to septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and reduced quality of life. Survivors may experience physical impairment, decreased functional ability, and greater dependence on others. The emergency department (ED) is a key setting for the early identification and management of sepsis. As the first point of care, the ED plays an important role in screening, diagnosis, and timely treatment. Emergency nurses are essential in recognizing early signs of sepsis, monitoring physiological changes, and supporting treatment in collaboration with multidisciplinary healthcare teams. Current evidence highlights the importance of initiating sepsis management within the first hour of recognition, particularly in older adults, to improve survival and reduce complications. This article presents evidence-based nursing approaches for the care of patients with sepsis in the emergency department. The discussion includes patient assessment, recognition of physiological deterioration, physical examination and screening tools, guideline-based interventions, monitoring for treatment-related complications, ongoing evaluation, and patient safety considerations. These approaches aim to support emergency nurses in providing timely, effective, and high-quality care while improving patient outcomes in emergency settings.Downloads
References
Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Alshamsi F, Azevedo LCP, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026. Crit Care Med. 2026;54(4):725-812. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000007075.
Jarczak D, Kluge S, Nierhaus A. Sepsis—pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:628302. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.628302
Yamamoto H, Usman M, Koutrouvelis A, Yamamoto S. Mechanism of sepsis. J Mol Pathol. 2025;6(3):18. doi:10.3390/jmp6030018
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
GBD 2021 Global Sepsis Collaborators. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2025;13(12):e2013-e2026. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00356-0
Tancharoen L, Pairattanakorn P, Thamlikitkul V, Angkasekwinai N. Epidemiology and burden of sepsis at Thailand’s largest university-based national tertiary referral center during 2019. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11:899. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11070899
Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD, Baker JM, Iwashyna TJ, Bhattacharya J, et al. The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(7):856-863. doi:10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.
Wallgren UM, Larsson E, Su A, et al. Keywords reflecting sepsis presentation based on mode of emergency department arrival: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Int J Emerg Med. 2021;14:78. doi:10.1186/s12245-021-00396-z
Pollayut U, Puwarawuttipanit W, Phligbua W, Rongrungruang Y. Activities of daily living and determinant factors among sepsis survivors during hospitalization: a cross-sectional study. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2025;29(2):343-355. doi:10.60099/prijnr.2025.271797
Singjan N, Sutti N, Monkong S. Perceptions of relatives about symptoms and signs in older adults with sepsis: a cross-sectional study. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2023;27(3):431-444. doi:10.60099/prijnr.2023.261134
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
Delaney A, Borges-Sa M, Chew MS, et al. Current standard of care for septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2026;52(1):89-103. doi:10.1007/s00134-025-08211-6
Arora J, Mendelson AA, Fox-Robichaud A. Sepsis: network pathophysiology and implications for early diagnosis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023;324(5). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00003.2023
Srdi T, Đuraševi S, Laki I, et al. From molecular mechanisms to clinical therapy: understanding sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(14):7770. doi:10.3390/ijms25147770
Dülger D, Ture Z, Yolcu A, et al. Sepsis in elderly patients: investigation of prognostic factors in a secondary healthcare facility. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):907. doi:10.1186/s12879-025-11286-7
Olgers TJ, Dijkstra RS, Drost-de Klerck AM, ter Maaten JC. The ABCDE primary assessment in the emergency department in medically
ill patients: an observational pilot study. Neth J Med. 2017;75(3):106-111. Available from: https://njmonline.nl/article_ft.php?a=1828&d=1213&i=204
Reddy M, Kulkarni M, Kanakalakshmi ST, Shenoy L, KrishnaBhat RR. Non-invasive SpO2/FiO2 ratio as surrogate for PaO2/FiO2 ratio: a scoping review. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025;11(3):221-232. doi:10.2478/jccm-2025-0024
Jeon Y, Kim S, Ahn S, et al. Predicting septic shock in patients with sepsis at emergency department triage using systolic and diastolic shock index. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;78:196-201. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.029
Fredrick FC, Meda AKR, Singh B, Jain R. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency: latest pathophysiology and management guidelines. Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(3):331-340. doi:10.4266/acc.2024.00647
Tang F, Yuan H, Li X, Qiao L. Effect of delayed antibiotic use on mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;129:111616. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111616
Monnet X, Lai C, Ospina-Tascon G, De Backer D. Evidence for a personalized early start of norepinephrine in septic shock. Crit Care. 2023;27:322. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04593-5
Zulkifli Z, Handrawan SE, Murtadho MAR, Banun S. Association between cumulative fluid overload and clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Bali J Anesthesiol. 2025;9(3):150-157. doi:10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_142_25
Pfortmueller CA, Dabrowski W, Wise R, van Regenmortel N, Malbrain MLNG. Fluid accumulation syndrome in sepsis and septic shock: pathophysiology, relevance, and treatment—a comprehensive review. Ann Intensive Care. 2024;14(1):115. doi:10.1186/s13613-024-01336-9
Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2017. Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/media/a4ibkkbf/news2-final-report_0_0.pdf Accessed Dec, 23 2025.
Wei S, Xiong D, Wang J, Liang X, Wang J, Chen Y. The accuracy of the National Early Warning Score 2 in predicting early death in prehospital and emergency department settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2023;11(2):95. doi:10.21037/atm-22-6587
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chulabhorn Royal Academy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Disclaimer
Articles published in this journal are the copyright of Chulabhorn Royal Academy.
The opinions expressed in each article are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Chulabhorn Royal Academy or any other faculty members of the Academy. The authors are fully responsible for all content in their respective articles. In the event of any errors or inaccuracies, the responsibility lies solely with the individual authors.