Nursing Care for Adults with Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Evidence-Based Approaches and Critical Nursing Roles

Authors

  • Ratsadagorn Phonphat Bang Kruai Hospital
  • Phoomin Doungsuriya Boromarajjonani College of Nursing, Nakhon lampang, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute

Keywords:

Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing Care, Sepsis

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency with high morbidity and mortality, particularly when recognition and treatment are delayed. Disease progression may lead to septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction, resulting in poor clinical outcomes and reduced quality of life. Survivors may experience physical impairment, decreased functional ability, and greater dependence on others. The emergency department (ED) is a key setting for the early identification and management of sepsis. As the first point of care, the ED plays an important role in screening, diagnosis, and timely treatment. Emergency nurses are essential in recognizing early signs of sepsis, monitoring physiological changes, and supporting treatment in collaboration with multidisciplinary healthcare teams. Current evidence highlights the importance of initiating sepsis management within the first hour of recognition, particularly in older adults, to improve survival and reduce complications. This article presents evidence-based nursing approaches for the care of patients with sepsis in the emergency department. The discussion includes patient assessment, recognition of physiological deterioration, physical examination and screening tools, guideline-based interventions, monitoring for treatment-related complications, ongoing evaluation, and patient safety considerations. These approaches aim to support emergency nurses in providing timely, effective, and high-quality care while improving patient outcomes in emergency settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Alshamsi F, Azevedo LCP, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026. Crit Care Med. 2026;54(4):725-812. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000007075.

Jarczak D, Kluge S, Nierhaus A. Sepsis—pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:628302. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.628302

Yamamoto H, Usman M, Koutrouvelis A, Yamamoto S. Mechanism of sepsis. J Mol Pathol. 2025;6(3):18. doi:10.3390/jmp6030018

Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

GBD 2021 Global Sepsis Collaborators. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2025;13(12):e2013-e2026. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00356-0

Tancharoen L, Pairattanakorn P, Thamlikitkul V, Angkasekwinai N. Epidemiology and burden of sepsis at Thailand’s largest university-based national tertiary referral center during 2019. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11:899. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11070899

Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD, Baker JM, Iwashyna TJ, Bhattacharya J, et al. The timing of early antibiotics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(7):856-863. doi:10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.

Wallgren UM, Larsson E, Su A, et al. Keywords reflecting sepsis presentation based on mode of emergency department arrival: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Int J Emerg Med. 2021;14:78. doi:10.1186/s12245-021-00396-z

Pollayut U, Puwarawuttipanit W, Phligbua W, Rongrungruang Y. Activities of daily living and determinant factors among sepsis survivors during hospitalization: a cross-sectional study. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2025;29(2):343-355. doi:10.60099/prijnr.2025.271797

Singjan N, Sutti N, Monkong S. Perceptions of relatives about symptoms and signs in older adults with sepsis: a cross-sectional study. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2023;27(3):431-444. doi:10.60099/prijnr.2023.261134

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

Delaney A, Borges-Sa M, Chew MS, et al. Current standard of care for septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2026;52(1):89-103. doi:10.1007/s00134-025-08211-6

Arora J, Mendelson AA, Fox-Robichaud A. Sepsis: network pathophysiology and implications for early diagnosis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023;324(5). doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00003.2023

Srdi T, Đuraševi S, Laki I, et al. From molecular mechanisms to clinical therapy: understanding sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(14):7770. doi:10.3390/ijms25147770

Dülger D, Ture Z, Yolcu A, et al. Sepsis in elderly patients: investigation of prognostic factors in a secondary healthcare facility. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):907. doi:10.1186/s12879-025-11286-7

Olgers TJ, Dijkstra RS, Drost-de Klerck AM, ter Maaten JC. The ABCDE primary assessment in the emergency department in medically

ill patients: an observational pilot study. Neth J Med. 2017;75(3):106-111. Available from: https://njmonline.nl/article_ft.php?a=1828&d=1213&i=204

Reddy M, Kulkarni M, Kanakalakshmi ST, Shenoy L, KrishnaBhat RR. Non-invasive SpO2/FiO2 ratio as surrogate for PaO2/FiO2 ratio: a scoping review. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025;11(3):221-232. doi:10.2478/jccm-2025-0024

Jeon Y, Kim S, Ahn S, et al. Predicting septic shock in patients with sepsis at emergency department triage using systolic and diastolic shock index. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;78:196-201. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.029

Fredrick FC, Meda AKR, Singh B, Jain R. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency: latest pathophysiology and management guidelines. Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(3):331-340. doi:10.4266/acc.2024.00647

Tang F, Yuan H, Li X, Qiao L. Effect of delayed antibiotic use on mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;129:111616. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111616

Monnet X, Lai C, Ospina-Tascon G, De Backer D. Evidence for a personalized early start of norepinephrine in septic shock. Crit Care. 2023;27:322. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04593-5

Zulkifli Z, Handrawan SE, Murtadho MAR, Banun S. Association between cumulative fluid overload and clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Bali J Anesthesiol. 2025;9(3):150-157. doi:10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_142_25

Pfortmueller CA, Dabrowski W, Wise R, van Regenmortel N, Malbrain MLNG. Fluid accumulation syndrome in sepsis and septic shock: pathophysiology, relevance, and treatment—a comprehensive review. Ann Intensive Care. 2024;14(1):115. doi:10.1186/s13613-024-01336-9

Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2: Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Updated report of a working party. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2017. Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/media/a4ibkkbf/news2-final-report_0_0.pdf Accessed Dec, 23 2025.

Wei S, Xiong D, Wang J, Liang X, Wang J, Chen Y. The accuracy of the National Early Warning Score 2 in predicting early death in prehospital and emergency department settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2023;11(2):95. doi:10.21037/atm-22-6587

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

1.
Phonphat R, Doungsuriya P. Nursing Care for Adults with Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Evidence-Based Approaches and Critical Nursing Roles. J Chulabhorn Royal Acad [internet]. 2026 Aug. 14 [cited 2026 Aug. 24];8(4):370-9. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jcra/article/view/279546

Issue

Section

Academic Articles