[2026-08-21] Serial Assessment of Corticomotor Pathway Continuity and Upper Extremity Recovery in Subacute Stroke: A Preliminary Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33165/rmj.2027.e279665Keywords:
Subacute stroke, Corticomotor pathway continuity, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Upper extremity recovery, Serial assessmentAbstract
Background: Upper extremity weakness is common after stroke and significantly affects functional independence. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to assess corticomotor pathway integrity and predict motor recovery, but evidence in the subacute phase remains limited.
Objectives: To use serial TMS to examine corticomotor pathway continuity and its association with upper extremity recovery in patients with early subacute stroke and impaired hand function.
Methods: In this preliminary prospective cohort, patients 1 to 6 months after first-ever stroke with upper extremity impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] ≤ 53) underwent serial single-pulse TMS using the visual observation of movement method with a parabolic coil. Motor response (MR) presence and motor threshold were recorded bilaterally, with contralesional stimulation of the affected hand when the ipsilesional MR was absent. The primary outcome was the FMA-UE. Secondary outcomes included the Shoulder Abduction and Finger Extension score, Box and Block Test, Barthel Index, spasticity, and muscle strength. Assessments were performed between 1 and 6 months poststroke.
Results: Seven participants were enrolled (5 completed at least 2 follow-ups). Ipsilesional MR presence was not associated with FMA-UE. Three of 4 initially MR-absent participants showed late MR appearance at approximately 4 to 5 months poststroke, 2 of whom achieved clinically meaningful motor improvement. One participant who remained ipsilesionally MR-absent showed a contralesional response at 6 months. Across the cohort, Barthel Index scores improved in all participants, while muscle strength and spasticity remained relatively stable despite variable motor recovery.
Conclusions: Early subacute corticomotor pathway continuity was not clearly associated with upper extremity recovery, and the early absence of a MR should not be used to limit rehabilitation. Serial assessment revealed late reemergence of corticomotor responses, suggesting that subacute corticomotor continuity is dynamic rather than fixed. Rather than a large cross-sectional correlation study, future work should use serial, electromyography-based TMS within individual patients to track whether the MR or functional performance plateaus first, supporting progress monitoring and realistic expectation-setting.
References
Luke C, Dodd KJ, Brock K. Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):888-898. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr793oa
Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693-1702. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19(1):84-90. doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc
Karatzetzou S, Tsiptsios D, Terzoudi A, Aggeloussis N, Vadikolias K. Transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation on stroke prognosis. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(2):873-888. doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05791-1
Chen SY, Winstein CJ. A systematic review of voluntary arm recovery in hemiparetic stroke: critical predictors for meaningful outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33(1):2-13. doi:10.1097/NPT.0b013e318198a010
Bembenek JP, Kurczych K, Karli Nski M, Czlonkowska A. The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke − a systematic review of the literature. Funct Neurol. 2012;27(2):79-84.
Jo JY, Lee A, Kim MS, et al. Prediction of motor recovery using quantitative parameters of motor evoked potential in patients with stroke. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(5):806-815. doi:10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.806
Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, Smith MC, Borges VM, Barber PA. PREP2: a biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(11):811-820. doi:10.1002/acn3.488
Lundquist CB, Nielsen JF, Arguissain FG, Brunner IC. Accuracy of the upper limb prediction algorithm PREP2 applied 2 weeks poststroke: a prospective longitudinal study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(1):68-78. doi:10.1177/1545968320971763
Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, Greenwood RJ. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(8):1909-1922. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm218
Shanks MJ, Byblow WD. Corticomotor pathway function and recovery after stroke: a look back and a way forward. J Physiol. 2025;603(3):651-662. doi:10.1113/JP285562
Lemon RN. Descending pathways in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:195-218. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125547
Chanubol R, Wongphaet P, Chavanich N, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive sensory motor training therapy on the recovery of arm function in acute stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(12):1096-1104. doi:10.1177/0269215512444631
Varnava A, Stokes MG, Chambers CD. Reliability of the 'observation of movement' method for determining motor threshold using transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;201(2):327-332. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.016
Jitsakulchaidej P, Wivatvongvana P, Kitisak K. Normal parameters for diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation using a parabolic coil with biphasic pulse stimulation. BMC Neurol. 2022;22(1):510. doi:10.1186/s12883-022-02977-8
Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):456-462. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.023
Oliveira CS, Almeida CS, Freitas LC, et al. Use of the box and block test for the evaluation of manual dexterity in individuals with central nervous system disorders: a systematic review. Man Ther Posturology Rehabil J. 2016;14:436. doi:10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2016.14.436
Sinoff G, Ore L. The Barthel activities of daily living index: self-reporting versus actual performance in the old-old (> or = 75 years). J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(7):832-836. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01510.x
Misra UK, Kalita J. Motor evoked potential changes in ischaemic stroke depend on stroke location. J Neurol Sci. 1995;134(1-2):67-72. doi:10.1016/0022-510x(95)00216-4
Kumar P, Prasad M, Das A, et al. Utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging for prediction of upper-limb motor recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022;25(1):54-59. doi:10.4103/aian.aian_254_21
Collins KC, Clark AB, Pomeroy VM, Kennedy NC. The test-retest reliability of non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of corticospinal pathway excitability early after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(26):6439-6446. doi:10.1080/09638288.2024.2337107
Milot MH, Spencer SJ, Chan V, et al. Corticospinal excitability as a predictor of functional gains at the affected upper limb following robotic training in chronic stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(9):819-827. doi:10.1177/1545968314527351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee RMJ.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





