Comparison of Postural Score Between Standing and Sitting in Female Adolescents with and without Idiopathic Scoliosis

Main Article Content

ธัญญลักษณ์ วรรณก้อน
ธัญลักษณ์ ศรีบุญเรือง
นวลลออ ธวินชัย
สมชัย ปทุมาสูตร
พรรณี ปึงสุวรรณ

Abstract

Background: A whole-body alignment assessment in standing position is the popular method. However, the main posture in student’s life is a sitting position. The study of postural changes between standing and sitting positions is an important for planning treatment of idiopathic scoliosis school age groups.


Objective: To compare the postural score that received from the (Reedco Postural Score) RPS between standing and sitting postures in 30 female adolescents aged 10 - 16 years with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). There were 30 able-bodied female adolescents in a control group (matched age and weight).


Methods: All participants were received photo taking from 2 planes while they were standing and sitting. The photos of participant's posture were scored with the RPS sheet by a pair of physical therapists. Two - way ANOVA was used to compare differences between these variables and set the significance level at p <0.05.


Results: IS group has a significantly higher sitting posture score (73.15 ± 12.81) more than the standing postural score (61.50 ± 13.14) (p <0.001). In addition, the control group has higher sitting posture score (93.89 ± 7.77) more than standing postural score (87.33 ± 7.63) (p <0.001). The comparing between groups found that the IS group has a lower sitting and standing postural score than the control group (p <0.001), p <0.001, respectively).


Conclusion: The appropriated sitting position can help promoting the symmetry of the posture rather than standing position.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
วรรณก้อน ธ, ศรีบุญเรือง ธ, ธวินชัย น, ปทุมาสูตร ส, ปึงสุวรรณ พ. Comparison of Postural Score Between Standing and Sitting in Female Adolescents with and without Idiopathic Scoliosis. Thai J Phys Ther [internet]. 2020 Dec. 15 [cited 2026 Jan. 18];42(3):136-4. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjpt/article/view/186057
Section
Research Articles

References

Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JCY, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008; 371:1527-37.

Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013; 7:3-9.

Kwok G, Yip J, Cheung M-C, Yick K-L. Evaluation of myoelectric activity of paraspinal muscles in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during habitual standing and sitting. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015.

Cho IY, Park SY, Park JH, Kim TK, Jung TW, Lee HM. The effect of standing and different sitting positions on lumbar lordosis: radiographic study of 30 healthy volunteers. Asian Spine J 2015; 9:762-9.

Vaughn JJ, Schwend RM. Sitting sagittal balance is different from standing balance in children with scoliosis. J PediatrOrthop2014; 34:202-7.

Fortin C, Ehrmann Feldman D, Cheriet F, Labelle H. Differences in standing and sitting postures of youth with idiopathic scoliosis from quantitative analysis of digital photographs. Phys OccupTherPediatr2013; 33:313-26.

Janicki JA, Alman B. Scoliosis: review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health 2007; 12:771-6.

Immel A, Le Cabec A, Bonazzi M, et al. Effect of X-ray irradiation on ancient DNA in sub-fossil bones - Guidelines for safe X-ray imaging. Sci Rep 2016; 6:32969.

McRoberts L, Cloud R, Black C. Evaluation of the New York Posture Rating chart for assessing changes in postural alignment in a garment study. CTRJ 2013; 31:81-96.

Roman GA, Samar V. Workstation ergonomics improves posture and reduces musculoskeletal pain in video interpreters. J Interpret 2015; 24:1-19.

McRoberts L, Cloud R, Black C. Evaluation of the New York Posture Rating chart for assessing changes in postural alignment in a garment study. CTRJ 2013; 31:81-96.

Horng MH, Kuok CP, Fu MJ, Lin CJ, Sun YN. Cobb Angle Measurement of Spine from X-Ray Images Using Convolutional Neural Network. Comput Math Methods Med. 2019; 2019: 6357171.

Bae JS, Jang JS, Lee SH, Kim JU. A comparison study on the change in lumbar lordosis when standing, sitting on a chair, and sitting on the floor in normal individuals. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 51:20-3.

Cho IY, Park SY, Park JH, Kim TK, Jung TW, Lee HM. The effect of standing and different sitting positions on lumbar lordosis: radiographic study of 30 healthy volunteers. Asian Spine J 2015; 9:762-9.

Raczkowski JW, Daniszewska B, Zolynski K. Functional scoliosis caused by leg length discrepancy. Arch Med Sci 2010; 6:393-8.

Bae JS, Jang JS, Lee SH, Kim JU. A comparison study on the change in lumbar lordosis when standing, sitting on a chair, and sitting on the floor in normal individuals. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 51:20-3.

Lee ES, Ko CW, Suh SW, Kumar S, Kang IK, Yang JH. The effect of age on sagittal plane profile of the lumbar spine according to standing, supine, and various sitting positions. J OrthopSurg Res 2014; 9:11.

Kratenova J, Zejglicova K, Maly M, Filipova V. Prevalence and risk factors of poor posture in school children in the Czech Republic. J Sch Health 2007; 77:131-7.

Lee BJ, Cha HG, Lee WH. The effects of sitting with the right leg crossed on the trunk length and pelvic torsion of healthy individuals. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28:3162-64.

Woo HS, Oh JC, Won SY. Effects of asymmetric sitting on spinal balance. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28:355-9.