Negative predictive value of sonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in Lamphun hospital
Keywords:
อัลตร้าซาวน์, ไส้ติ่งอักเสบเฉียบพลัน, ค่าพยากรณ์บวก, ค่าพยากรณ์ลบ, ความไว, ความจำเพาะ, ความแม่นยำAbstract
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common medical emergency. Nowadays, ultrasound is helpful in diagnosis of ultrasound, particularly in atypical case. In an attempt to determine whether negative predictive value of ultrasound can be use as a reasonable screening tool, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 138 patients (86 males and 52 females, age range 5-90 years) who presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and undergoing ultrasound in Lamphun hospital during January 2010- December 2011. The sonographic findings were graded on a 5-point scale, ranging from a normal appendix identified (grade 1) to frankly acute appendicitis (grade 5). The sonographic findings were compared with surgical and pathologic findings. Thirty-six patients (26.1%) had negative sonographic findings, whereas one hundred and two patients (73.9%) had appendicitis on the sonograms. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the method in diagnosing appendicitis were 85.7%, 63.3%, 88.2%, 58.3% and 80.4%, respectively. In conclusion, sonography has a high PPV but low NPV. It is a rapid, simple non-radiation technique that should be the first-pass approach, particularly for the patient with doubtful clinical signs. Further investigation is of value if ultrasound is not diagnostic.
References
Assefa G, Meseret S, Nigussie Y. The roleofultrasound in diagnosng of acute appendicitis. Ethip Med J. 2006; 44: 67-74.
Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adult?Ametaanalysis. Radiology. 2006; 241: 83-94.
Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1886; 92: 321-346.
Gamanagatti S, Vashisht S, Kapoor A, Chumber S, Bal S. Comparison of graded comparison ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J. 2007; 48: 80-87.
Gracey D, Mcclure MJ. The impact of ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis. ClinRadiol. 2007; 62: 573-578.
Hobler K. Acute and Suppurative Appendicitis: Disease duration and its implications for quality improvement. Permanente Medical Journal 2. 1998; 2: 5-8.
Johansson EP, Rydh A, Riklung KA. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis. ActaRadiol. 2007; 48: 267-273.
Kouame N, N’goan-Domoua AM, N’dri KJ, et al. The diagnosis value adult appendicitis. DiagnInterv Imaging. 2012 Mar; 93(3): 24-28.
Lee SL, Walsh AF Ho HS. Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography Do Not Improve and May Delay the Diagnosis and Treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2001; 136(5): 556-562.
Monzer M. Abu-yousef, Jon J. Bleicher, James W. Maher, et al. High resolutionsonography of acute appendicitis. AJR. 1987 July; 149(1): 53-58.
Pieper R, Kager L, Nesman P. Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1,028 cases of emergency appendectomy. ActaChir Scand. 1982; 140: 51-62.
Petroianu A. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2012; 10(3): 115-119.
Pacharn P, Jun Ying, Leann E. Linam, et al Sonography in the evaluation of acute appendicitis: are negative sonographic findings good enough? J Ultrasound Med. 2010
Dec; 29(12): 1749-55.
Reich B, Zalut T, Weiner SG. An international evaluation of ultrasound vs. computedtomography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct; 29: 4-68.
Posen MP, Ding A, Blake MA, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria right lower quadrant pain suspected appendicitis. J Am CollRadiol. 2011 Nov; 8(11): 749-755.
Schwartz and Seymour I. “appendix.” In Principles of Surgery, edited by Seymour Schwartz, et al. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
Schwerk WB, Wicktrup B, Rothmind M, Ruschoff J. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1989; 97: 630-639.
Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendicealimeging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 933-941.

