Long term outcomes in severe lupus nephritis
Keywords:
Lupus nephritis, Crescent, Renal survivalAbstract
Lupus nephritis is one of the most common forms of glomerulonephritis, particularly in Oriental region. Proliferative lupus nephritis is associated with poor long-term outcomes. However, natural course of crescentic lupusnephritis is not well understood. Objective: To determine clinical course associated with patients with crescentic lupus nephritis (glomerular crescents > 30%) compared with proliferative lupus nephritis with crescent <30%, including clinical presentations, remission rate, treatment modalities, renal function, and renal and patient survival. Methods: Pathologic reports and allmedical records of patients with proliferative lupus nephritis were retrospectively reviewed for clinicalpresentations,laboratory reports at the biopsy time, 6 months and 12 months after treatment, modality of treatment and treatmentoutcomes. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on percentage of glomerular crescents in pathological reports: group 1 with glomerular crescents < 30% and group 2 with crescent >30%. Results: 89 patients diagnosed during 1999-2003 were included in this study, 52 patients in group 1 and 37 patients in group 2. Patients with crescents >30% were associated more nephritis feature (91.9% vs 69.2%, P < 0.05), higher serum creatinine levels (292.5±203.9 vs 177.32±168.4 Pmol/L, P < 0.01), and lower C3 levels (523.3±212.0 vs 653.8±298.4 Pg/ml, P < 0.05). There were no differences in age, sex, SBP, DBP, duration of disease, serum albumin, cholesterol, C4, CH50, and urine protein.In group 2 received double intravenous pulse (IVMP+IVCY) therapy higher than group 1 (32.4% vs 11.5%, P < 0.05). Both groups had same maintenance therapies. Patients with more crescentic lupus nephritis were associated with poorer outcome, including initial remission rate (48.6% vs 80.7%, P < 0.01), time to doubling serum creatinine (53.8 vs 34.3 months, P < 0.05), and one renal survival (91% vs 84% P < 0.05). There were 2 patient deaths, one in each group during the study period. There was no difference in relapse rates in both groups. Conclusion: Patients with crescentic lupus nephritis > 30% were associated with more nephritic feature, higher serum creatinine levels, lower C3 levels, and poorer treatment outcomes, regarding remission rate, time to doublingserum creatinine, and renal survival.
References
Gerald B. Appel, Jai Radhakrishnan, and Vivette D. D’Agati Secondary Glomerular Disease In: Barry M. Brenner (eds) Brenner & Rector’s The Kidney. 7th ed.2004 pp. 1381-1481
Howard A. Austin III, Dimitrios T. Boumpas and James E. Balow Crescentic nephritis in systemic lupus erythemotosus. In: Rapid Progressive Glomerulonephritis. Oxford medical publication pp 186-206
Ronald J. Falk, J. Charles Jennette, and Patrick H. Nachman Primary Glomerular Disease In: Barry M. Brenner (eds) Brenner & Rector’s The Kidney. 7th ed.
2004 pp. 1293-1380 5. Marc A. Seelee, L.A. Trouw and M.R. Daha Diagnostic significance of anti-C1q antibodies insystemic lupus erythemotosus. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 12: 619-624, 2003
V Sumethkul, P Chalermsanyakorn, S changsirikulchai and P Radinahamed Lupus nephritis: a challenging cause of rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis. Lupus 9: 424-428, 2000
Austin HA, Boumpas DT, Vaughan EM, Bolow JE: predicting renal outcomes in severe lupus nephritis: Contributions of clinical and histologic data. Kidney Int 43: 544-550, 1994
Austin HA, Klippel JH, Balow JE, Le Riche NGH, Steinberg AD, Platz PH, et al. Therapy of lupus nephritis: controlled trial of prednisolone and cytotoxic drugs. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 2156-63
Gourley MF, Austin HA, Scott D, et al. Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. Ann Intern Med 125:549-557, 1996
C C Mok, R W S wong, K N Lai treatment of severe proliferative lupus nephritis: the current state. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 799-804

