Low shrinkage resin composite in operative dentistry
Keywords:
low shrinkage resin composites, bulk-filled resin composite, polymerization shrinkageAbstract
Low shrinkage resin composites are dental materials that feature the low contraction of polymerization. These resin composites can reduce shrinkage and shrinkage stress that accumulates on the teeth and post-operative sensitivity which is the common problem of conventional resin composite restoration. The development of the resin composites principally changes to new monomer called silorane. In the curing process, the ring-opening of silorane compensates a significant amount of the polymerization shrinkage. In addition, decreasing viscosity of monomer and changing fillers’ structure to be specific characteristics can reduce shrinkage and shrinkage stress from polymerization. Recent studies suggest that low shrinkage composites have significantly less polymerization shrinkage than conventional composites, and recommend the usage of these composites in deep cavity restoration. However, some studiesshow conflicting results about the properties of these materials. Therefore, dental personnel should consider other factors in addition to the shrinkage of the material for the most effective dental restoration. These resin composites are the material of choice in dentistry, which need to be studied further.
References
2. Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2004;20:535-542.
3. เฉลิมพล ลี้ไวโรจน์, มนตรี จันทรมังกร. การบูรณะฟันหลังด้วยวัสดุบูรณะสีเหมือนฟัน. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1.กรุงเทพมหานคร: ซันต้าการพิมพ์; 2549. หน้า167-184.
4. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization.Dent Mater 2005;21:36–42.
5. Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL, Braga RR.Effect of Admixed High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) spheres on contraction stress and properties of experimental composites. J Biomed Mater Res B ApplBiomate2003;66(1):318-323.
6. Todd JC, WannerM.Scientific Documentation TetricEvoCeram® Bulk Fill[online]. 2014:10-1. Available from:http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorative-materials/tetric-evoceram-bulk-fill
7. Lazarchik DA, Hammond BD, Sikes CL, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins.JProsthet Dent2007;98:129-140.
8. Fusejima F, Kaga S, Kumagai T, Sakuma T. Polymerization shrinkage ratio and force of various Resin Composites. GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan 2009.
9. Arrais CAG, Oliveira MT, Mettenburg D, Rueggeberg FA, Giannini M. Silorane-and high filled-based ”low-shrinkage” resin composites: shrinkage,flexural strength and modulus. Braz Oral Res.,(Sao Paulo)2013;27(2):97-102.
10. Tiba A, Zeller GG, Estrich CG, Hong A. A Laboratory Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Versus Traditional Multi-Incremental-Fill Resin-Based Composites.J Am Dent Assoc2013;144(10):1182-3.
11. Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, Neiva GF. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk fill flowable composite resins. Oper Dent2014;39:441-8.
12. Gordon J. Advantage and challenges of Bulk-Fill Resins.CR Clinical Report 2012;5(1):1-2.
13. Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of Bulk- Fill Resin Composites and Highly Filled FlowableResin.Oper Dent2014;39(6):000-000.
14. Monteiro GQ, Montes MA, Rolim TV, Mota CC, Kyotoku BC, Gomes AS, Freitas AZ. Alternative methods for determining shrinkage in restorative resin composites. Dent Mater 2011:XXXE1-XXXE10.
15. Herrero AA, Yaman P, Dennison JB. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of packable composites. Quintessence International 2005;36(1):25-31.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารทันตาภิบาล