Factors Related to Recovery Capital of People with Substance Use Disorder in Northeastern Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/jtnmc.v41i02.276984Keywords:
substance use disorder, self-esteem, psychological flexibility, friendship intimacy, social support, recovery capitalAbstract
Introduction Drug problems are an issue currently confronting both Thailand and the global community, with their severity continuing to escalate. Prolonged and high-level substance use can lead to mental illness and may develop hallucinations and psychiatric disorders, which can lead to violent behaviors, self-harm, or harm to close associates. Such consequences pose serious threats to the safety of life, health, and property of family members and the general public, thereby undermining national stability in both economic and social dimensions. Recovery capital refers to all resources available to people with substance use disorders that can support their recovery process. These resources include physical health, psychological flexibility, social relationships, economic aspects, and cultural assets, all aimed at enabling sustainable abstinence and improving quality of life. Accordingly, it is essential to investigate the factors associated with recovery capital among people with substance use disorders in this study.
Objective The objective of this study is to examine the relationships between self-esteem, psychological flexibility, friendship intimacy, and social support, and recovery capital among people with substance use disorders in the Northeastern region of Thailand.
Design This study employed a descriptive correlational design, applying the concept of recovery capital as proposed by Groshkova and colleagues. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, through which the factors associated with recovery capital were categorized into four domains: 1) self-esteem, 2) psychological flexibility, 3) friendship intimacy, and 4) social support.
Methodology The sample consisted of 320 people with substance use disorders in the rehabilitation phase who were receiving treatment at two Thanyarak hospitals in the Northeastern region of Thailand. The sample size was determined based on principles of power analysis, and participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Inclusion criteria were: 1) age 18 years or older; 2) currently undergoing rehabilitation for substance use disorders with rehabilitation duration of at least one month; 3) absence of withdrawal symptoms; 4) voluntary participation and willingness to cooperate in the study; and 5) ability to read and write in Thai. Research instruments included: 1) the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; 2) the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Substance Abuse Thai Version (AAQ-SA); 3) the Friendship Intimacy Questionnaire (FIQ); 4) the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS); and 5) the Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for these instruments were .80, .68, .88, .87, and .87, respectively. Data were collected between July 1 and December 31, 2024, through self-administered questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic and baseline characteristics, while Pearson’s correlation coefficient was applied to examine the relationships between self-esteem, psychological flexibility, friendship intimacy, and social support with recovery capital among people with substance use disorders.
Results The participants had a mean age of 30.43 years (SD = 7.43). The majority were male (77.20%), single (80.60%), and reported a monthly family income below 25,000 THB (85.94%). The primary substance used was methamphetamine (91.90%), followed by cannabis (2.80%), alcohol (2.50%), cigarettes (1.90%), and mixed substance use (0.90%). The most frequently reported reason for substance use was stress reduction and mood regulation (41.90%). The overall mean score of recovery capital among people with substance use disorders was 44.48 (SD = 10.44). Significant positive correlations were found between recovery capital and self-esteem (r = .425, p < .01), psychological flexibility (r = .392, p < .01), friendship intimacy (r = .256, p < .01), and social support (r = .666, p < .01).
Recommendation Nurses and mental health teams providing care for people with substance use disorders in inpatient rehabilitation units can apply the findings of this study to inform them of treatment and rehabilitation planning. Interventions should be planned to emphasize enhancing knowledge and beliefs related to self-esteem, psychological flexibility, friendship intimacy, and social support, as these factors are positively associated with recovery capital among people with substance use disorders. Future research should further examine the predictive power of these factors for recovery capital.
Downloads
References
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global overview: drug demand drug supply. Vienna: UNODC; 2023.
Princess Mother National Institute on drug Abuse Treatment. Number and percentage of outpatient drug users, fiscal years 2021-2025. Pathum Thani: Princess Mother National Institute on Drug Abuse Treatment; 2026. Available from: https://www.pmnidat.go.th/thai/index.php?Itemid=53&id=5909&option=com_content&task=view (in Thai)
Groshkova T, Best D, White W. The Assessment of Recovery Capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32(2):187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.x PMID: 22882622
Granfield R, Cloud W. Social capital and natural recovery: the role of social resources in overcoming substance use. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36(11): 1543–1570. https://doi.org/10.1081/ja-100106963 PMID: 11693955
Laudet AB, White W. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(1):27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080701681473
Best D, Gow J, Knox T, Taylor A, Groshkova T, White W. Recovery capital and pathways to recovery among heroin users. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200(2–3): 122–129.
Cloud W, Granfield R. Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(12–13):1971–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802289762
McKay J. Recovery science and practice. Addiction. 2020;115(12):2328–2330.
Buhrmester D. Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Dev. 1990;61(4):1101–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130878 PMID: 2209180
Rosenberg M, Simmons RG. Black and white self-esteem: The urban school child. In: Reiss AJ, Barber B, Edwards GF, Mcdill NB, Stinchcombe AL, White HC, editors. Arnold and Caroline Rose monograph series in ecology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1979. Available from: https://www.asanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Rose_1972_Black-and-White-Self-Esteem-The-Urban-School-Child_Morris-Rosenberg.pdf
Best D, Vanderplasschen W, Nisic M. Measuring capital in active addiction and recovery: the development of the strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS). Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Jun 16;15(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00281-7 PMID: 32546171
Paowphutorn P, Wong-Anuchit C. Factors predicting psychological flexibility in people with substance use disorder in northeastern Thailand. Journal of Mental Health of Thailand. 2024;32(1):1-12. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmht/article/view/266217 (in Thai)
Wongpakaran T, Wongpakaran N. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A study among Thai university students. J Psychiatr Assoc Thailand. 2012;56(1):59–70. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216242467_Confirmatory_factor_analysis_of_Rosenberg_Self-Esteem_Scale_A_study_of_Thai_student_sample (in Thai)
Luoma JB, Drake CE, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC. Substance abuse and psychological flexibility: The development of a new measure. Addict Res Theory. 2011;19(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2010.524956
Wong-Anuchit C. Thai Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–Substance Abuse (Thai AAQ-SA): The psychological flexibility assessment. Mahasarakham: Faculty of Nursing, Mahasarakham University; 2020. (in Thai)
Nathithan M. Factors influencing depression among adolescents in Mueang District, Chiang Mai Province [Master’s thesis]. Chiang Mai: Graduate School, Chiang Mai University; 2003. https://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2546/numhp0546mn_abs.pdf (in Thai)
Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Wongpakaran T, Wongpakaran N. A comparison of reliability and construct validity between the original and revised versions of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Psychiatry Investig. 2012;9(1):54–8. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2012.9.1.54
Vilsaint CL, Kelly JF, Bergman BG, Groshkova T, Best D, White W. Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.022
Thanyarak Hospital. Guidelines for the implementation of the Mini Thanyarak Model: Revised edition 2023. Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health; 2023. Available from: https://urlkub.co/uhQew3 (in Thai)
Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1),67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18. PMID: 30648682
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. 2019
Nuchjamnong K. Factors influencing treatment continuity among drug users in drug rehabilitation centers. J Public Health. 2020;50(3):345–357. (in Thai)
Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB). Report on the survey of drug use behaviors and risk factors among Thai youth, 2022. Bangkok: ONCB; 2022. (in Thai)
Srirat P. Hope and self-efficacy toward treatment outcomes among clients in compulsory drug rehabilitation. Thai J Public Health Res. 2018;16(2): 112–124. (in Thai)
Suwansorn S. Factors affecting relapse among clients after drug rehabilitation. J Public Health Nurs. 2019;33(1):45–59. (in Thai)
Shepherd L. Values clarification and recovery outcomes among adults in substance treatment. Addict Behav. 2020;102:106–134.
Twohig MP, Levin ME. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a treatment for anxiety and substance use. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;52:101–110.
Phumphuang C. Psychological flexibility factors and rehabilitation outcomes of substance users in the community. Thai J Ment Health. 2021;29(2): 145–158. (in Thai)
Lookatch SJ, Wimberly AS, McKay JR. Effects of social support and 12-step involvement on recovery among people in continuing care for cocaine dependence. Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(13): 2144-2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1638406.2019. PMID: 31322037
Rueangkit L., Katewongsa P., Chucharoen P. Effect of Social support on continuum of care for methamphetamine addicts. Mahasarakham Hospital Journal, 2019 . 15;14(1):74-82. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MKHJ/article/view/204592 (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



