Factors Predicting Heat Stroke Preventive Behaviors Among Ground Service Staff at Suvarnabhumi Airport

Authors

  • Songkrot Saringkarn Safety and Quality Assurance Department, Bangkok Flight Services, Samut Prakan Province, Thailand
  • Kanlaya Munluan Faculty of Nursing, Rattana Bundit University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Trin Thipsut Faculty of Nursing, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Samut Prakan Province, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60099/jtnmc.v41i04.277619

Keywords:

predictive factors, heat stroke preventive behaviors, ground service personnel, health belief model, Suvarnabhumi airport

Abstract

Introduction Over the past decade, rising global temperatures and increasingly severe climate change have subjected outdoor workers to escalating heat exposure. Heat stroke represents the most critical heat-related illness and constitutes a medical emergency, arising from the failure of thermoregulatory, circulatory, and central nervous system functions. Without timely prevention or intervention, heat stroke can lead to serious complications and death. Thailand, as a tropical country, experiences high temperatures throughout most of the year, with summer temperatures often reaching levels that are hazardous to health. Outdoor workers are therefore at greater risk of heat-related illnesses compared to the general population. Ground service personnel at Suvarnabhumi Airport are particularly vulnerable, as their duties require prolonged work on aircraft aprons where heat is intensified by concrete surface reflection, engine exhaust, and strict operational time constraints. These conditions may limit opportunities for rest breaks, hydration, and self-monitoring of abnormal symptoms. This study aims to identify predictive factors for heat-stroke preventive behaviors among ground service personnel at Suvarnabhumi Airport, with the ultimate goal of informing the development of appropriate strategies and interventions to safeguard their health.

Objectives The objectives of this study were twofold: 1) To examine the levels of heat stroke preventive behaviors and individual perceptions (perceived susceptibility to heat stroke, perceived severity of heat stroke, perceived benefits of preventive behaviors, perceived barriers to preventive behaviors, and perceived self-efficacy in performing heat stroke prevention behaviors), support from related persons; organizational management for heat stroke prevention; and knowledge about heat stroke, and 2) To identify factors predicting heat stroke preventive behaviors among ground service personnel at Suvarnabhumi Airport.

Design This study adopted a predictive correlational design, applying the Health Belief Model to investigate factors influencing heat stroke preventive behaviors among ground service personnel. Within this framework, three dimensions were examined, 1) individual perceptions, including perceived susceptibility to heat stroke, perceived severity of heat stroke, perceived benefits of preventive behaviors, perceived barriers to preventive behaviors, and perceived self-efficacy in performing such behaviors; 2) cues to action, specifically support from related persons and management for heat stroke prevention; 3) modifying factors, including knowledge about heat stroke.

Methodology The study sample consisted of 176 ground service personnel employed at Suvarnabhumi Airport, Samut Prakan Province, who had been in their current positions for at least 6 months. Participants were selected using a two-stage random sampling with proportion. The research instrument was a self-administered questionnaire comprising seven parts: (1) personal information, (2) knowledge about heat stroke, (3) perceptions related to heat stroke, (4) perceived self-efficacy in performing heat stroke preventive behaviors, (5) support from related persons, (6) management for heat stroke prevention, and (7) heat stroke preventive behaviors. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and Stepwise multiple regression analysis.

Results The majority of the sample were male (87.50%), single (66.50%), and most frequently aged 35–39 years (25.57%). The highest proportion had completed upper secondary/ vocational education (34.10%). More than half had work experience as ground service personnel for 1–5 years (55.68%) and worked five days per week (58.00%). Regarding individual perceptions, perceived susceptibility to heat stroke, perceived severity of heat stroke, and perceived benefits of preventive behaviors were high, whereas perceived barriers to preventive behaviors and perceived self-efficacy in performing preventive behaviors were moderate. For cues to action, support from related persons was low, while management for heat stroke prevention was moderate. Knowledge about heat stroke, as a modifying factor, was at a good level. Heat stroke preventive behaviors among ground service personnel were found to be at a moderate level. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that significant predictors of heat stroke prevention behaviors included support from related persons (β = .429, p < .001), perceived self-efficacy in performing preventive behaviors (β = .216, p < .001), management for heat stroke prevention (β = .221, p < .001), and perceived barriers to preventive behaviors (β = -.163, p = .003). Together, these factors explained 51.1% of the variance in heat-stroke preventive behaviors among ground service personnel at Suvarnabhumi Airport (Adjusted R² = .511, p < .001).

Recommendation Executives, supervisors, occupational safety officers, and nurses can apply the findings of this study to promote heat stroke preventive behaviors by encouraging and supporting ground service personnel at the individual level, providing reminders regarding heat stroke prevention, and developing models or programs for prevention. These efforts should emphasize enhancing perceived self-efficacy and reducing perceived barriers to preventive behaviors among ground service personnel. At the policy level, organizational executives can use the results to develop policies, training curricula, alert systems, and workplace management strategies that systematically facilitate the practice of heat-stroke prevention behaviors among ground service personnel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Heat and health; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-heat-and-health

Chokkhanchitchai S. Editorial note: Heat stroke. Journal of Preventive Medicine Association of Thailand. 2019;9(1):1-2. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JPMAT/article/view/190672/133326 (in Thai)

Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. Guidelines for surveillance and risk communication on heat-related health hazards, 2025. Chaitiemwong N, editor. Nonthaburi: The Department; 2025. Available from: https://hia.anamai.moph.go.th/web-upload/12xb1c83353535e43f224a05e184d8fd75a/m_magazine/35644/5451/file_download/04cb3f6093f5faa10e1e9226c4781df4.pdf (in Thai)

Yovi EY, Nastiti A, Kuncahyo B. Heat-related knowledge, risk perception, and precautionary behavior among Indonesian forestry workers and farmers: implications for occupational health promotion in the face of climate change impacts. Forests. 2023;14(7):1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071455.

Jaikamwang N, Bunsee W, Yakama Y, Pongkaew J, Sutthichan N, Saelee S, et al. Knowledge, perception, and behaviors regarding heat stroke prevention among new conscripts. Journal of Nursing and Health Research. 2021;22(1):40–51. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bcnpy/article/view/246203/168639 (in Thai)

Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Announcement on prevention of diseases and health hazards during Thailand’s summer, B.E. 2568 (2025). Nonthaburi: The Department; 2025. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/publish/1686320250311080656.pdf (in Thai)

International Labour Organization (ILO). Be cautious of excessive heat. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2025 Apr 8. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/resource/training-material/be-cautiousexcessive-heat

Safety & Health Care Section of a Private Company at Suvarnabhumi Airport. A report surveying heatstroke prevention practices among ground service employees of a private company in the Suvarnabhumi Airport area. (Unpublished report). 2024.

Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

Aljaroudi A, Alardhi M, Khan AA. Combatting the heat: assessing heat stress risks in aircraft maintenance environments. In: Luximon A, Xiong S, editors. Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2025); 2025 Jul 26-30; Orlando, FL, USA. AHFE Open Access; 2025. p. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006458.

International Air Transport Association (IATA). IATA Annual Safety Report: Executive Summary and Safety Overview - 60th Edition. Montreal: IATA; 2024. Available from: https://www.iata.org/contentassets/a8e49941e8824a058fee3f5ae0c005d9/safetyreport-executive-and-safety-overview-2023.pdf

van Selm L, Williams S, de’Donato F, Briones- Vozmediano E, Stratil J, Sroczynski G, et al. Occupational heat stress among migrant and ethnic minority outdoor workers: a scoping review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025;12(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-025-00481-y PMID: 40123011

Ruangdej Chaosuansreecharoen K, Srilaong A, Akharawirawa T, Hlupo W, Kongsanit S. Heat-related illness prevention behaviors among older adults in southern Thailand: determinants based on Health Belief Model. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2026;57(1):56-88. Available from: https://journal.seameotropmednetwork.org/index.php/jtropmed/article/view/1343/779

International Labour Organization. More workers than ever are losing the fight against heat stress. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2024 Jul 25. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/more-workers-ever-are-losingfight-against-heat-stress

Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203 PMID: 3378902

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149–60. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

Bloom BS. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw- Hill; 1971.

Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 7th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2013.

Becker MH. The Health Belief Model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4): 324–508. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200407

Kjellstrom T, Freyberg C, Lemke B, Otto M, Briggs D. Estimating population heat exposure and impacts on working people in conjunction with climate change. Int J Biometeorol. 2018 Mar;62(3): 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1407-0 PMID: 28766042

Martinez B, Beck C, Ghosh JK. Utilizing the health belief model to understand heat mitigation behaviors in the United States: Results of an online panel survey. PLoS One. 2025;20(10):e0334697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334697 PMID: 41086185

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2): 310-57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.

Uchino BN. Understanding the links between social support and physical health: a life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4(3): 236–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x PMID: 26158961

Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health promotion in nursing practice. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2015.

Ullah F, Ragazzoni L, Hubloue I, Barone-Adesi F, Valente M. The use of the health belief model in the context of heatwaves research: a rapid review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024;18:e34. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.2 PMID: 38384190

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

1.
Saringkarn S, Munluan K, Thipsut T. Factors Predicting Heat Stroke Preventive Behaviors Among Ground Service Staff at Suvarnabhumi Airport. J Thai Nurse Midwife Counc [internet]. 2026 Sep. 18 [cited 2026 Sep. 19];41(04):523-41. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJONC/article/view/277619

Issue

Section

Research Articles