Effects of switching antiretroviral therapy from ACRIPTEGA (TLD) to KOCITAF on renal function recovery in people living with HIV and acute kidney injury: a prospective observational study at Thasala Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/taj.2026.14Keywords:
HIV, KOCITAF, TLD, renal function, tenofovir alafenamide, acute kidney injuryAbstract
This study aimed to assess the effects of switching from ACRIPTEGA (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, dolutegravir; TLD) เป็น KOCITAF (tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, emtricitabine, dolutegravir) on renal function recovery in people living with HIV (PLHIV) who developed acute kidney injury (AKI). A prospective observational study was conducted at Thasala Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, between June 2024 and May 2025. Medical records of 520 PLHIV were reviewed. Thai patients aged ≥ 18 years who had received TLD for at least 6 months and met the criteria for declined renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² or serum creatinine >1.2 mg/dL) were screened. A total of 65 eligible patients who were switched from TLD to KOCITAF and followed up at months 1, 3, and 6. eGFR and serum creatinine were assessed before switching (baseline) and after switching at months 1, 3, and 6. Changes in renal function were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, and factors associated with renal recovery were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. The 65 participants were predominantly male (63.11%), with a mean age of 54.08±11.08 years. Before switching, the mean eGFR was 48.32±11.35 mL/min/1.73 m², and the mean serum creatinine level was 1.58±0.79 mg/dL. After switching to KOCITAF, the mean eGFR significantly increased to 58.21±18.93 mL/min/1.73 m², while the mean serum creatinine level decreased to 1.32±0.37 mg/dL within 6 months (p<0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that eGFR was significantly higher at all post-switch follow- up time points (months 1,3, and 6) compared with the TLD period, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed among the post switch time points. The mean CD4 count increased from 631.98±464.45 to 960.28±304.36 cells/µL indicating that the regimen switch did not compromise immunological efficacy. Factors significantly associated with renal recovery included baseline eGFR >70 mL/min/1.73m², duration TLD use ≤24 months, no prior use of TDF-containing antiretroviral regimens before starting TLD, and absence of weight loss exceeding 3 kg (p<0.05). In conclusion, switching antiretroviral therapy from TLD to KOCITAF was associated with significant renal function improvement in renal function without compromising immunologic outcomes. These findings support the preferential use of TAF-based regimens over TDF-based regimens in PLHIV who are at risk of renal complications.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031593
World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. 2nd ed [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Nov 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549684
Department of Disease Control. Thailand national guidelines on HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention 2021/2022 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 8]. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/das/journal_detail.php?publish=12810 (in Thai)
World Health Organization. HIV and AIDS [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids
National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-arv/whats-new
National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in adults and adolescents with HIV [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infections/whats-new
British HIV Association. Guidelines on antiretroviral treatment for adults living with HIV-1 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.bhiva.org/file/63513a1745ea9/BHIVA-guidelines-on-antiretroviral-treatment-for-adults-living-with-HIV-1-2022.pdf
European AIDS Clinical Society. Guidelines for the management of people living with HIV in Europe. Version 11.1 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.eacsociety.org/media/guidelines-11.1_final_09-10.pdf
Gandhi RT, Bedimo R, Hoy JF, Landovitz RJ, Smith DM, Eaton EF, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2022 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 10];329(1):63-84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.22246
Saag MS, Gandhi RT, Hoy JF, Landovitz RJ, Thompson MA, Sax PE, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2020 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA panel. JAMA [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 10];324(16):1651-69. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17025
Aboud M, Kaplan R, Lombaard J, Zhang F, Hidalgo JA, Mamedova E, et al. Dolutegravir versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir both with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy in adults with HIV-1 infection in whom first-line therapy has failed (DAWNING): an open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3b trial. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 10];19(3):253-64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30036-2
Turkova A, White E, Mujuru HA, Kekitiinwa AR, Kityo CM, Violari A, et al. Dolutegravir as first- or second-line treatment for HIV-1 infection in children. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 10];385(27):2531-43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2108793
Zash R, Holmes L, Diseko M, Jacobson DL, Brummel S, Mayondi G, et al. Neural-tube defects and antiretroviral treatment regimens in Botswana. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 10];381(9):827-40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1905230
Department of Disease Control. Thailand national guidelines on HIV/AIDS diagnosis, treatment and prevention 2020/2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/das/journal_detail.php?publish=11388 (in Thai)
Dechphol P. A comparison of CD4 count before and after ACRIPTEGA (TLD) treatment in HIV patients at Thasala Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, 2022-2023 [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: https://wichakan.mecnst.com/Articleview.php?idAr=16 (in Thai)
Plordchukaw U, Keawkai R, Dechphol P. Factors affecting CD4 white blood cell count in HIV patients after switching to the TLD (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, and dolutegravir) combination regimen at Tha Sala Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Thai AIDS Journal [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 May 17];37(1):13-22. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ThaiAIDSJournal/article/view/271147 (in Thai)
Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30(3):607-10
Mayer KH, Molina J-M, Thompson MA, Anderson PL, Mounzer KC, De Wet JJ, et al. Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (DISCOVER): primary results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 10];396(10246):239-54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31065-5
Ogbuagu O, Ruane PJ, Podzamczer D, Salazar LC, Henry K, Asmuth DM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet HIV [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 10];8(7):e397-407. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3018(21)00071-0
Bonora S, Calcagno A, Trentalange A, Di Perri G. Elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of HIV in adults. Expert Opin Pharmacother [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Nov 10];17(3):409-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2016.1129401
Di Perri G. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) clinical pharmacology. Infez Med [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 10];29(4):526-29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.53854/liim-2904-4
Gupta SK, Post FA, Arribas JR, Eron JJ, Wohl DA, Clarke AE, et al. Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials. AIDS [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 20];33(9):1455-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000002223