Consideration of Key Factors Affecting the Probability of False Acceptance of Testing and Calibration Laboratories

Laboratory False Acceptance Risk

Authors

  • Lomsalai Wongchanta Regional Medical Science Center 3 Nakhonsawan, Department of Medical Sciences

Keywords:

Probability of false acceptance, Decision rule, Test uncertainty ratio, End-of-period-reliability

Abstract

        The decision on laboratory test results is important because it affects consumers and manufacturers. It is well known that all measurements contain errors. In 2006, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) issued ANSI/NCSL Z540.3 which specifies that the Probability of False Acceptance (PFA) should not exceed 2%. This study aims to elucidate the key factors affecting a false acceptance risk. The study was conducted by searching for academic information from widely published documents. The reviews found two important factors affecting the risk of false acceptance: 1) the capability of the laboratory measurements and 2) the capability of the product manufacturing process. If the laboratory has a Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) of 4.6:1 or higher, or the production process has an End-of-Period-Reliability (EOPR) of 89% or higher, the risk of false acceptance will not exceed 2%. Therefore, a testing and calibration laboratory accredited with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 can set the decision rule that considers only the laboratory measurement capability factors, without considering the production process capability factors, if the laboratory has sufficient measurement capability. The laboratory should ensure that the estimation of measurement uncertainty takes into account all important variables. In addition, practitioners should have knowledge and understanding of the nature of measurement and Probability Density Function (PDF) to determination of reliable and acceptable decision rules for both the laboratories and the customers.

References

International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025 Testing and calibration laboratories. [online]. [cited 2024 Dec 26]; [1 screen]. Available from: URL: https://www.iso.org/ISO-IEC-17025-testing-andcalibration-laboratories.html.

ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2017.

สุพล พรหมมาพันธุ์. การพิสูจน์ตัวตนด้วยเทคโนโลยีชีวมาตรกับความเสี่ยงในการละเมิดสิทธิส่วนบุคคล. การพิสูจน์ตัวตนด้วยเทคโนโลยีชีวมาตรกับความเสี่ยงในการละเมิดสิทธิส่วนบุคคล. ว แพทยสารทหารอากาศ. [วารสารออนไลน์]. 2020; [สืบค้น 26 ธ.ค. 2024]; 66(1): [14 หน้า]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: URL: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rtafmg/article/view/242341/164857.

ANSI/NCSL Z540.3:2006. Requirements for the calibration of measuring and test equipment. America: American National Standard for Calibration; 2006. p. 5.

Guidelines on decision rules and statements of conformity: ILAC-G8:09/2019. Australia: International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation; 2019.

Mimbs SM, Kennedy JF. Using reliability to meet Z540.3's 20/0 rule. 2011 NCSL International Workshop and Symposium. [online]. 2011; [cited 2024 Jul 15]: [21 screens]. Available from: URL: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110014475/downloads/20110014475.pdf.

Military standard gage inspection: MIL-STDI20. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. [online]. 1951; [cited 2024 Jun 12]: [216 screens]. Available from: URL: https://elsmar.com/pdf_files/Military%20Standards/MIL-STD-120.pdf.

Mitutoyo America Corporation. Decision rules, TAR, and TUR. [online]. 2018; [cited 2024 Oct 8]; [2 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.mitutoyo.com/webfoo/wp-content/uploads/15005A.pdf.

Griess S. Aircraft tool calibration: What is test accuracy ratio? Lincoln, NE: Duncan Aviation Calibration Services. [online]. 2024; [cited 2024 Aug 8]: [1 screen]. Available from: URL: https://www.duncanaviation.aero/intelligence/aircraft-tool-calibration-whatis-test-accuracy-ratio.

Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data—the role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment: JCGM 106:2012:2012. Sèvres: BIPM; 2012.

Hogan R. Expanded uncertainty and coverage factors or calculating uncertainty. [online]. 2015; [cited 2024 Sep 2]: [12 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.isobudgets.com/expanded-uncertainty-and-coverage-factorsfor-calculating-uncertainty.

Turney S. Critical values of t for two-tailed tests. [online]. 2023; [cited 2024 Sep 2]: [2 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/students-t-table.

Z Table. Z score table, normal distribution table, standard normal table. [online]. [cited 2024 Oct 12]. [13 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.ztable.net.

Z-core calculator. [online]. [cited 2024 Oct 12]. [3 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.calculator.net/z-score-calculator.html?c1raw=1499.8&c1mean=1500&c1sd=.12&calctype=zscore&x=Calculate.

Dobbert M. A guard-band strategy for managing false-accept risk. NCSLI Measure. [online]. 2008; [cited 2024 Jun 4]: [11 screens]. Available from: URL: https://keysight.zinfi.net/concierge/OEMs/keysight/wwwcontent/Syndication/pdf/MeasurementFundamentasKR/5991-1267.pdf.

ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008. Uncertainty of measurement-Part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2008.

สำนักงานพัฒนาวิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยีแห่งชาติ (สวทช.). แนวทางการการขึ้นทะเบียนผลิตภัณฑ์กับสำนักงานคณะกรรมการอาหารและยา (อย.). [ออนไลน์]. 2562; [สืบค้น 26 ธ.ค. 2567]; [25 หน้า]. เข้าถึงได้ที่: URL: https://www.nstda.or.th/rqm/images/20190812-_ver3-ap.pdf

Downloads

Published

28-03-2025

How to Cite

1.
Wongchanta L. Consideration of Key Factors Affecting the Probability of False Acceptance of Testing and Calibration Laboratories: Laboratory False Acceptance Risk. ว กรมวิทย พ [internet]. 2025 Mar. 28 [cited 2025 Dec. 9];67(1):149-62. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dmsc/article/view/271606

Issue

Section

Review Articles