Comparative Study on Fine Needle Capillary Versus Fine Needle Aspiration Technique in Tissue Diagnosis of Organ Lumps
Keywords:
Fine needle aspiration cytology, fine needle capillary cytology, tissue diagnosis of organ lumpsAbstract
This research aims to compare fine needle capillary (FNC) versus fine needle aspiration (FNA) technique, in cytological diagnosis of various organ lumps e.g. breast and thyroid. The technique of FNC, will give the feeling arrives at the character of a piece while, stab better then can enforce and fix the depth, the direction in stabbing well more, and a little contaminated blood than FNA. But it still have arguments arrives at the adequateness of the tissue that FNC can get enough compare with FNA, which is standard technique.
Materials and method: Prospective randomized comparative study was conducted on 115 patients attending at Phaholpolpayuhasena Hospital from 1 March to 30 May 2013. The study tools used were medical data records, the statistics that used in data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation (S.D.), t-test and chi-square.
Result: FNC, in adequacy of tissue showed, no result of unsatisfactory (0/58) but FNA had 7% unsatisfactory (4/57) but there was no statistic signification in both groups. In cases of masses below 1 cm in size FNC, in adequacy of tissue, showed again no result of unsatisfactory (0/18) but FNA had 40% unsatisfactory (4/10) and have statistic signification. Those was no difference in diagnosis result in both techniques.
Conclusion: the result indicated that FNC was more likely to be diagnostically superior than FNA in case of mass size below 1 cm but no difference in cases of mass more than 1 cm, FNC was suggested to used in small lesion to improved adequacy.
References
2. Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, et al., editors. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2010.
3. พรชัย โอเจริญรัตน์ และคนอื่นๆ, บรรณาธิการ. ศัลยศาสตร์ศีรษะ คอและเต้านม. เล่ม 8. กรุงเทพฯ: ภาควิชาศัลยศาสตร์ คณะแพทยศาสตร์ศิริราชพยาบาล มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล; 2557.
4. Akhtar M, Ali MA, Huq M, et al. Fine-needle biopsy: comparison of cellular yield with and without aspiration. DiagnCytopathol.1989;5(2):162-5.
5. Zajdela A, Zillhardt P, Voillemot N. Cytological diagnosis by fine needle sampling without aspiration. Cancer. 1987;59(6):1201-5.
6. Rizvi SA, Husain M, Khan S, et al. A comparative study of fine needle aspiration cytology versus non-aspiration technique in thyroid lesions. Surgeon. 2005;3(4):273-6.
7. Kinney TB, Lee MJ, Filomena CA, et al. Fine needle biopsy: prospective comparison of aspiration versus nonaspiration techniques in the abdomen. Radiology. 1993;186(2):549-52.
8. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for cytopathologic analysis: utility of syringe handles, automated guns, and the nonsuction method. Radiology. 1992;185(3):819-24.
9. Akhtar SS, Imran-Ul-Huq, Faiz-U-Din M, et al. Efficacy of fine-needle capillary biopsy in the assessment of patients with superficial lymphadenopathy. Cancer. 1997;81(5):277-80.
10. Mahajan P, Sharma PR. Fine-needle aspiration versus non aspiration technique of cytodiagnosis in Thyroid lesions. JK Science. 2010;12(3):120-2.
11. Tauro LF, Lobo GJ, Fernandes H, et al. A Comparative Study on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology versus Fine Needle Capillary Cytology in Thyroid Nodules. Oman Med J. 2012;27(2):151-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
ลิขสิทธิ์บทความเป็นของผู้เขียนบทความ แต่หากผลงานของท่านได้รับการพิจารณาตีพิมพ์ลงวารสารแพทย์เขต 4-5 จะคงไว้ซึ่งสิทธิ์ในการตีพิมพ์ครั้งแรกด้วยเหตุที่บทความจะปรากฎในวารสารที่เข้าถึงได้ จึงอนุญาตให้นำบทความในวารสารไปใช้ประโยชน์ได้ในเชิงวิชาการโดยจำเป็นต้องมีการอ้างอิงถึงชื่อวารสารอย่างถูกต้อง แต่ไม่อนุญาตให้นำไปใช้ในเชิงพาณิชย์
