The Results of Lacrimal Duct Injury Treatment Between Microscope Method and Pigtail Probe Method

Authors

  • Adirek Ratanawalepong, M.D. Division of Surgery Prachomklao Hospital, Phetchaburi

Abstract

A comparative study of the management of Iacrimal duct injury by two techniques was presented. By evaluating the statistical data on 40 patients, 20 Iacrimal duct injuries were repaired by microscope method under general anaesthesia in major operating room and the other 20 Iacrimal duct injuries were repaired by pigtail method under local anaesthesia in a minor operating room. The study revealed that the good functional results were obtained in both techniques, but the operating time, cost and hospital stay were reduced in the pigtail probe method ; 10.0 : 45.9 minutes, 1,375.25 : 7,668.65 bahts and 0 : 1.75 days, respectively. The reduction of operating cost, operating time and hospital stay of the pigtail probe method were statistically signicant from the microscope method (P < 0.001)

Author Biography

Adirek Ratanawalepong, M.D., Division of Surgery Prachomklao Hospital, Phetchaburi

Thai Board of Plastic Surgery

Downloads

Published

2018-07-11

How to Cite

1.
Ratanawalepong A. The Results of Lacrimal Duct Injury Treatment Between Microscope Method and Pigtail Probe Method. Reg 4-5 Med J [internet]. 2018 Jul. 11 [cited 2026 Jan. 1];27(2-2):675-8. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reg45/article/view/133890

Issue

Section

Original Article