The Survival Rate of Dental Implants in Elderly Patients in the Royal Dental Implant Project at Phrachormklao Hospilal
Keywords:
dental implant, survival rate, implant supported complete denturesAbstract
Objective: The purposes were to assess the survival rate of dental implants supporting complete dentures in the mandibular jaw and to assess the satisfaction of elderly patients participating in the Royal Implant Project at Phrachormklao Hospital, Phetchaburi Province.
Methods: By monitoring the treatment of patients from 2010 to 2022, 40 people were enrolled. The clinical variables recorded were the bleeding index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, dissolution of bone from radiographs, implant mobility, implant survival, and patient satisfaction with implant use. After collecting information, the data were calculated using the percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
Results: Of total; 16.25 percent had line bleeding; 12.5 percent had moderately gingivitis, swollen, gloss, and redness; 82.5 percent had probing pocket depth 2–6 mm; and 20.0 percent with bone solubility greater than or equal to 50 percent. The survival rate was 96.25 percent. There were 3 implants detached. The overall satisfaction with the implant usage was at a high level (mean = 4.02, SD = 1.091).
Conclusion: Survival rate of an implant used to support complete denture in the lower jaw in the Royal Implant Program was 96.25 percent at Year 12 and the patients were overall satisfied at a high level, with an average of 4.02, which is acceptable and in line with other studies.
References
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement onoverdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as firstchoice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerdontology 2002;19(1):3–4.
Naert IE, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, et al. A randomised clinical trialon the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in mandibular overdenture therapy. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1(2):81–8. doi: 10.1007/s007840050016.
Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(4):331–9.
The royal dental implant project office, Institute of Dentistry. Dental record for the implant project in the honor of His Majestry the King, on the auapicious occasion of the 80th birthday on December 5th, 2007.
Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP, Kerring T, eds. Proceeding of the first European workshop on periodontology. Germany: Quintessence; 1994.
Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch EJ, et al. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2(4):145–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x.
Loe H. The gingival Index, the plaque Index and the retention index system. J Periodontal. 1967;38:610–6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610.
Lekholm U, Adell R, Lindhe J, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. II. A cross-section retrospective study. Int J OralMaxillofac Surg 1986;15:53–61. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80011-4.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van'tHof MA, et al. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 10 years' results of clinical aspects and after care of IMZ implants and Branemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(4):421–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01024.x.
Prapayasatok S, Janhom A, Verochana K, et al. Rodiographic evaluation of alveolar bone level around “FanYiM”implant-retained mandibular overdentures in the royal dental implant project. CM Dent J 2013;34(1):77–90.
Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the Inter national Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17(1):5–15. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059.
Krennmair G, Seemann R, Fazekas A, et al. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinicaltrial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27(6):1560–8.
Suwalee T. The Survival Rate of Thai Dental Implants (Fun Yim) Retained Overdenture of the Royal Dental Implant Project in Elderly Patients at Neurological Institute of Thailand. J of the Department of Medical Survices 2020;46(3):29–34.
Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, et al. Evaluation of survival and successs rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44(3):377–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023.
Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, et al. Nine-to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33(4):283–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00907.x.
Roos-Jansaker AM, Lindahl C, RenvertH, et al. Nine-to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:290–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00906.x.
Wismeyer D, van Waas MA, Veemeeren JI. Overdentures supported by ITI implants: a 6.5-year evaluation of patient satisfaction and prosthetic after care. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(6):744–9.
Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, et al. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anteriora trophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(6):873–8.
Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A Systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complicationsin implant dentistry reported inprospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:197–212. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x.
Humphrey S. Implant maintenance. Dent Clin North Am 2006;50(3):463–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.03.002.
Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. Arandomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(4):331–9.
Wismeyer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI. Overdentures supported by ITIimplants: a 6.5- year evaluation of patient satisfaction and prosthetic aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(6):744–9.
Pan HU, Lin TM, Liang CH. Comparison of patient's satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures and complete dentures. Biomed J 2014;37(3):156–62. doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.131384.
Kutkut A, Bertoli E, Frazer RPinto-Sinai G, et al. A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implantretained overdenture. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ลิขสิทธิ์บทความเป็นของผู้เขียนบทความ แต่หากผลงานของท่านได้รับการพิจารณาตีพิมพ์ลงวารสารแพทย์เขต 4-5 จะคงไว้ซึ่งสิทธิ์ในการตีพิมพ์ครั้งแรกด้วยเหตุที่บทความจะปรากฎในวารสารที่เข้าถึงได้ จึงอนุญาตให้นำบทความในวารสารไปใช้ประโยชน์ได้ในเชิงวิชาการโดยจำเป็นต้องมีการอ้างอิงถึงชื่อวารสารอย่างถูกต้อง แต่ไม่อนุญาตให้นำไปใช้ในเชิงพาณิชย์
