Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Moderate and Severe COPD Patients in Samutsakhon Hospital : A Prospective Experimental Study

Authors

  • Wichit Kagngorn M.D., Samutsakhon Hospital
  • Narongkorn Saiphoklang M.D., Thammasat University Hospital

Keywords:

6-min walk test (6MWT), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary rehabilitation (PR)

Abstract

Objective: To study the effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients on physical capacity using 6 minute walk test (6MWT), functional performance using mean scores of St. George’s Respiratory Questionaire (SGRQ) and spirometry results, and risk factors for acute exacerbation in COPD patients using modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and COPD assessment test (CAT) score .

Methods: This is a prospective experimental study by collecting data from history taking and data recording of COPD patients at the COPD clinic, along with 6MWT examination with the rehabilitation medicine team, Samutsakhon Hospital, and teaching how to continue physical therapy at home, together with the results of lung function tests by spirometry in March 2025 and 12 weeks later.

Results: Eighty-two COPD patients who visited the COPD clinic, Samutsakhon Hospital, 62 were male (83.8%); had an average age of 68.55 ± 9.76 years, an average weight of 61.3 ± 14.5 kilograms, and an average BMI of 23.21 ± 5.42 kilograms/square meter. Fifty COPD patients received home-based pulmonary rehabilitation, and 24 were in the control group. Both groups had similar basic information, such as age, gender, weight, severity of COPD, comorbidities, and results of lung function tests by spirometry.

COPD patients who did home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) had a statistically significant increase in walking distance (meters) compared to the control group at the end of the program (p-value < .001; 95% CI: -72, -32.8). The difference in blood oxygen level in the group who did home-based PR was statistically significantly less than the control group (p-value < .01; 95% CI: 0.3%, 1.9%). In addition, the SGRQ scores in the group who did home-based PR in all three sections, including symptoms, activities, and impacts, decreased more than in the control group (p-value < .05). The total score of SGRQ, it was found that the group that did home-based PR had a significantly higher decrease than the control group (p-value < .001). The difference in the total score was 1.9 ± 8 in the control group and -6.7 ± 9.8 in the intervention group (p ≤ .001; 95% CI: 3.9, 13.1). Moreover the results of the spirometry showed that the difference in %predicted FEV1, %predicted FEV1/FVC, and %predicted FEF25-75 before and after home-based PR were significantly better than the control group (p-value < .001).

Conclusion: Home-based PR program is a good and easy way to exercise. It helps moderate and severe COPD patients have a better quality of life. They can do their daily activities by themselves. If there is support for regular exercise, it will result in the ability to exercise and increase muscle groups in the future.

References

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2024 report) [internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 March 23]; Available from: URL: https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/

Venkatesan P. GOLD COPD report: 2024 update. Lancet Respir Med. 2024;12(1):15–6. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00461-7.

Puhan MA, Spaar A, Frey M, Turk A, Brändli O, Ritscher D, et al. Early versus late pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbations: a randomized trial. Respiration. 2012;83(6):499–506. doi: 10.1159/000329884.

Franssen FM, Rochester CL. Comorbidities in patients with COPD and pulmonary rehabilitation: do they matter? Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(131):131–41. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00007613.

Klimczak MK, Krzepkowski HA, Piotrowski WJ, Białas AJ. The short-term efficacy of a three-week pulmonary rehabilitation program among patients with obstructive lung diseases. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2576. doi:10.3390/ jcm13092576

Chadha N, Blackstock FC, Smith S, Camp PG, Tang C. Characteristics of rehabilitation programs for chronic respiratory diseases in Asia: A scoping review. Respir Med. 2025;236:107885. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107885.

Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C, et al. An official American thoracic society/European respiratory society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):e13–64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST.

Rochester CL, Alison JA, Carlin B, Jenkins AR, Cox NS, Bauldoff G, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation for adults with chronic respiratory disease: An official American thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;208(4):e7–26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1066ST.

Vestbo J, Anderson W, Coxson HO, Crim C, Dawber F, Edwards L, et al. Evaluation of COPD longitudinally to identify predictive surrogate end-points (ECLIPSE). Eur Respir J. 2008;31(4):869–73. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00111707.

Nicoletti M, da Costa CC, da Silva LD. Cardiovascular changes during the six-minute walk test in COPD patients. Fisioter Mov. 2024;37(11):e37122. doi: 10.1590/fm.2024.37122.

Zhang H, Hu D, Xu Y, Wu L, Lou L. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):262–73. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1999494.

แสงเดือน อภิรัตนวงศ์, อาภรณ์ ดีนาน, วรรณี เดียวอิศเรศ. ผลของโปรแกรมการปรับรูปแบบกิจกรรมที่ใช้แรงกายตามรายบุคคลต่อคุณภาพชีวิตในผู้ที่มีภาวะปอดอุดกั้นเรื้อรัง. วารสารวิทยาลัยพยาบาลบรมราชชนนี กรุงเทพ. 2561;34(3):55–64.

Sakunrag I, Boontha N, Boonpattharatthiti K, Dhippayom T. Impact of tele-pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2025;31(4):441–50.

doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0476.

Holland AE, Cox NS, Houchen-Wolloff L, Rochester CL, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, et al. Defining modern pulmonary rehabilitation. An official American thoracic society workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(5):e12–29. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-146ST.

Kantatong T, Panpanich R, Deesomchok A, Sungkarat S, Siviroj P. Effects of the tai chi qigong programme on functional capacity, and lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A ramdomised controlled trial. J Tradit Complement Med. 2020;10(4):354–9. doi:10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.03.008.

Pradella CO, Belmonte GM, Maia MN, Delgado CS, Luise AP, Nascimento OA, et al. Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for subjects with COPD: A randomized study. Respir Care. 2015;60(4):526–32. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02994.

Holland AE, Mahal A, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Burge AT, Cox NS, et al. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2017;72(1):57–65. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208514

แผนกกายภาพบำบัด สถาบันโรคทรวงอก กรมการแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. แนวทางการให้การรักษาทางกายภาพบำบัดในผู้ป่วยโรคปอดอุดกั้นเรื้อรัง [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. 2559 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ วันที่ 23 มีนาคม พ.ศ. 2567]; เข้าถึงได้จาก: URL: https://www.ccit.go.th/lung/document/COPD+Home.pdf

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Kagngorn W, Saiphoklang N. Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Moderate and Severe COPD Patients in Samutsakhon Hospital : A Prospective Experimental Study. Reg 4-5 Med J [internet]. 2025 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 31];44(4):565-79. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reg45/article/view/279618