Effectiveness of Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline on Post-Exposure Rabies Prophylaxis

Authors

  • Kittiphat Watthanapahou, M.D. Division of Emergency Medicine, Ratchaburi Hospital

Keywords:

mammal bite patient, rabies prophylaxis guidelines, Department of Disease Control, Ratchaburi Hospital

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline on post-exposure rabies prophylaxis and vaccination cessation rate after the animal bites and the animals were still alive more than 10 days.
Materials and method : This study was a retrospective study at an urban, tertiary hospital. 216 medical record were obtained from January 2011 through December 2013. We compared the rate of vaccination followed post-exposure rabies prophylaxis guidelines of Department of Disease Control Ministry of Public Health and vaccination cessation rate before and after the implementation of the Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline.
Results : The rate of vaccination follow post-exposure rabies prophylaxis guidelines of Department of Disease Control Ministry of Public Health between the two groups before and after the Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline was implemented representing a 35.2% and 59.3%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p- value = 0.01). Vaccination cessation rate after the animals bite and still alive more than 10 days after the use of Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline was 49.0%
Conclusions : The rate of vaccination follow rabies prophylaxis guidelines of the Department of Disease Control Ministry of Public Health increased and 49% cessation of vaccination after the animal bites and the animals were still alive more than 10 days after the Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline was implemented.

Author Biography

Kittiphat Watthanapahou, M.D., Division of Emergency Medicine, Ratchaburi Hospital

Thai Board of Emergency Medicine 

References

1. WHO Expert Consultation on rabies. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2005;931:1-88.

2. Dean DJ, Baer GM, Thomson WR. Studies on the local treatment of rabies-infected wounds. Bull World Health Organ 1963;28:477-86.

3. Rabies vaccines. WHO position paper. Wkly Epidermiol Rec 2007;82(49-50):425-35.

4. Manning SE, Rupprecht CE, Fishbein D, et al. Human rabies prevention-United States, 2008: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep 2008;57(RR-3):1-28.

5. Dodet B. An important date in rabies history. Vaccine 2007;25:8647-50.

6. Tepsumethanon V, Lumlertdacha B, Mitmoonpitak C, et al Fluorescent antibody test for rabies: prospective study 0f 8,987 brains. Clin infect Dis 1997;25:1459-61.

7. Tepsumethanon V, Lumlertdacha B, Mitmoonpitak C, et al. Survival of naturally infected rabid dogs and cats. Clin infect Dis 2004;39:278-80.

8. Zoonoses control. WHO consultation on intradermal application of human rabies vaccines. Wkly Epidermiol Rec 1995;70:336-8.

9. Dodet B; Asian Rabies Expert Bureau. Preventing the incurable: Asian rabies experts advocate rabies control. Vaccine 2006;24(16):3045-9.

10. Wilde H, Hemachudha T. How far can the antigen content to tissue culture rabies vaccines be reduced safely? Vaccine 2006;24(10):1489.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-20

How to Cite

1.
Watthanapahou K. Effectiveness of Ratchaburi Dog Bite Guideline on Post-Exposure Rabies Prophylaxis. Reg 4-5 Med J [internet]. 2018 Apr. 20 [cited 2025 Dec. 28];34(1):12-25. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reg45/article/view/119456

Issue

Section

Original Article