Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Thai Version of Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (Th-PRWE) in Distal Radius Fracture Patients

Panai Laohaprasitiporn; Yuwarat Monteerarat; Withawat  Jaderojananont; Roongsak  Limthongthang; Torpon  Vathana

doi:10.33192/Smj.2021.36

Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Thai Version of Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (Th-PRWE) in Distal Radius Fracture Patients

Authors

Panai Laohaprasitiporn Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-9433
Yuwarat Monteerarat Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-8010
Withawat Jaderojananont Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2509-7235
Roongsak Limthongthang Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-5658
Torpon Vathana Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-0507

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2021.36

Keywords:

Psychometric, patient outcome assessment, wrist injury, radius fracture

Abstract

Objective: Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) is a specific tool for the assessment of wrist function and has been validated and translated into many languages. This study aimed to translate the PRWE into the Thai language and to evaluate its validity, reliability, and responsiveness in operatively treated distal radius fracture patients.
Materials and Methods: PRWE was translated into the Thai language according to a linguistic validation protocol by a forward–backward translation process. In total, 53 distal radius fracture patients who underwent volar locking plate fixation were included in the present study. However, 8 patients were excluded due to multiple injuries, leaving 45 patients who were prospectively enrolled and evaluated with the Thai version of the PRWE (Th-PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire within 2 weeks of their surgery. Reliability of the Th-PRWE was assessed by the test–retest reliability and internal consistency. The content, concurrent, and criterion validity of the Th-PRWE were measured. At 3 months after the operation, patients were re-assessed with Th-PRWE and DASH. The standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) were assessed to identify the responsiveness to a change of the tool.
Results: Most of the patients were female (64%) with average age of 55 years old and had sustained distal radius fractures. The intraclass correlation for the test–retest reliability of the Th-PRWE was 0.9. The internal consistency of the Th-PRWE was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93). Th-PRWE had a high content validity (Item-objective congruence index = 0.8) and excellent correlation with DASH (Spearman’s rank correlation = 0.81; p < 0.001). Its responsiveness was also considered excellent (SRM = 1.12, ES = 1.28).
Conclusion: Th-PRWE is valid, reliable, and responsive for the evaluation of distal radius fracture patients.

Downloads

Published

09-03-2021

How to Cite

Laohaprasitiporn, P., Monteerarat, Y., Jaderojananont, W. ., Limthongthang, R. ., & Vathana, T. . (2021). Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Thai Version of Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (Th-PRWE) in Distal Radius Fracture Patients. Siriraj Medical Journal, 73(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2021.36

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 73 No. 4 (2021): April

Section

Original Article

License

Users are free to share, copy, and redistribute all articles published in the Siriraj Medical Journal (SMJ) in any medium or format as long as you follow the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the material, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the publisher endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.