Risk Factor of Proximal Lag Screw Cut-Out After Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation in Trochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Analytic Study

Authors

  • Chantas Mahaisavariya Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
  • Nomina Pradhan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
  • Kongkhet Riansuwan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Likit Rugpolmuang Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Banchong Mahaisavariya Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Direk Tantigate Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.74

Keywords:

Trochanteric fracture, pertrochanteric fracture, hip fracture, cut-out, cephalomedullary nail

Abstract

Objective: A cephalomedullary nail is the treatment of choice for trochanteric fractures; however, a lag screw cutout is one of the most devastating complications. The lag screw cut-out rate was reported to be around 2.5%–8.3%. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of lag screw cut-outs and identify the associated risk factors.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 267 trochanteric fracture patients treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation from January 2007 to December 2017 was conducted. The demographic variables were documented, comprising age, gender, fracture pattern, and AO/OTA classification. Immediate postoperative radiographs were assessed for quality of reduction and implant position. Lag screw cut-outs or radiographic union were determined using the final follow-up radiograph. Prognostic factors associated with lag screw cut-out were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Results: Of the 175 patients, 154 were successfully treated, and 21 had a lag screw cut-out. There were no significant differences in mean ages or genders of the union and cut-out groups. No lag screw cut-outs were observed in patients with AO/OTA 31-A1. Patients with AO/OTA 31-B2.1 had a higher rate of screw cut-out (OR 10.5, [3.22, 34.25] p < .001). The disintegration of basicervical fragments was significantly associated with lag screw cut-out (OR 5.51, [2.01, 15.12] p = .001). The highest cut-out rate was found in the superoanterior and superoposterior positions of the lag screw. However, the screw position did not reach the significance level in a multivariate analysis (p = .094).
Conclusion: The prevalence of lag screw cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation for trochanteric fractures was 12%. A simple, two-part, basicervical trochanteric fracture hads a significantly higher risk of lag screw cut-out.

References

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058-64.

Lorich DG, Geller DS, Nielson JH. Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:441-54.

Ninlerd C, Dungkong S, Phuangphay G, Amornsupak C, Narkbunnam R. Effect of home-based rehabilitation exercise program for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture after bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Siriraj Med J. 2020;72(4):307-14.

Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2010;34(5):719-22.

Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010;41(12):1312-6.

Riansuwan K, Jivasomboonkul S, Phimolsarnti R, Chandhanayingyong C, Asavamongkolkul A. Outcomes of proximal femoral locking-plate fixation for pathological fractures of the proximal femur. Siriraj Med J. 2021;73(9):603-8.

Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1.

Stern LC, Gorczyca JT, Kates S, Ketz J, Soles G, Humphrey CA. Radiographic Review of Helical Blade Versus Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low-Energy Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures: There is a Difference in Cutout. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(6):305-10.

Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PR. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-b(8):1029-34.

Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Gebuhr P. Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):470-5.

Kane P, Vopat B, Heard W, Thakur N, Paller D, Koruprolu S, et al. Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(8):2492-8.

Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(1):26-31.

Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10 Suppl):S1-133.

Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA, Bobak P. The calcar femorale in cemented stem fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(6):842-5.

De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(14):1266-72.

Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT, Ketz JP. Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):583-8.

Ehmke LW, Fitzpatrick DC, Krieg JC, Madey SM, Bottlang M. Lag screws for hip fracture fixation: Evaluation of migration resistance under simulated walking. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(6):1329-35.

Sommers MB, Roth C, Hall H, Kam BC, Ehmke LW, Krieg JC, et al. A laboratory model to evaluate cutout resistance of implants for pertrochanteric fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(6):361-8.

Massoud EI. Fixation of basicervical and related fractures. Int Orthop. 2010;34(4):577-82.

Yoo J, Chang J, Park C, Hwang J. Risk Factors Associated with Failure of Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):29-36.

Yoon JY, Park S, Kim T, Im GI. Cut-out risk factor analysis after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):107.

Published

01-10-2022

How to Cite

Mahaisavariya, C. ., Pradhan, N. ., Riansuwan, K. ., Tharmviboonsri, T. ., Rugpolmuang, L. ., Mahaisavariya, B. ., & Tantigate, D. . (2022). Risk Factor of Proximal Lag Screw Cut-Out After Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation in Trochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Analytic Study. Siriraj Medical Journal, 74(10), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.74

Issue

Section

Original Article