Patch Testing of Thai Children with Eczema

Authors

  • Pailin Puangpet Occupational and Contact Dermatology Clinic, Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok
  • Niorn Boonpuen Occupational and Contact Dermatology Clinic, Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok
  • Kasira Saipornchai Occupational and Contact Dermatology Clinic, Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok
  • Rungrat Suchaoin Occupational and Contact Dermatology Clinic, Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok
  • Pattarida Poompakdeepan Occupational and Contact Dermatology Clinic, Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok
  • John McFadden St John’s Institute of Dermatology, King’s College, London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i2.260740

Keywords:

Patch test, children, pediatric, eczema, allergic contact dermatitis

Abstract

Objective: To detect contact allergy rate and common allergens in Thai children presented with eczema.

Materials and Methods: A total of 124 children, aged 1-15 years, were patch tested using a pediatric screening series of 16 allergens and relevant additional allergens. Data on clinical presentation, atopic history and test results were collected.

Results: Contact allergy was found in 51 of 124 children (41.1%) presented with all forms of eczema. The common allergens were lanolin alcohol (8.9%), cocamidopropyl betaine (8.1%), nickel sulfate (7.3%), fragrance mix I (5.6%), formaldehyde (5.6%), thimerosal (5.6%), fragrance mix II (4.8%), cobalt chloride (4.0%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (2.4%), methylisothiazolinone (2.4%) and thiuram mix (2.4%). Nineteen of 50 atopic dermatitis patients (38%) showed positive patch test reactions.

Conclusion: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in children. Both atopic and non-atopic patients can develop contact dermatitis. Patch testing should be performed in children presented with eczema regardless of contact dermatitis history.

References

Rodrigues DF, Goulart EM. Patch-test results in children and adolescents: systematic review of a 15-year period. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(1):64-72.

Pigatto P, Martelli A, Marsili C, Fiocchi A. Contact dermatitis in children. Ital J Pediatr. 2010;13;36:2.

Kasemsarn P, Boonchai W. Usefulness of Patch Testing in Dermatology. Siriraj Med J. 2012;64(2):73-7.

Moustafa M, Holden CR, Athavale P, Cork MJ, Messenger AG, Gawkrodger DJ. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65:208-12.

Rodrigues DF, Goulart EM. Patch test results in children and adolescents. Study from the Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Dermatology Clinic, Brazil, from 2003 to 2010. An Bras Dermatol. 2015;90(5):671-83.

de Waard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2009; 218:119-25.

Simonsen AB, Deleuran M, Johansen JD, Sommerlund M. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children - a review of current data. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(5):254-65.

Zug KA, Pham AK, Belsito DV, DeKoven JG, DeLeo VA, Fowler Jr JF, et al. Patch testing in children from 2005 to 2012: results from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Dermatitis. 2014;25(6):345-55.

Cattani CAS, Oppermann K, Perazzoli S, Guarda NH, Barea P, Bonamigo RR. Sensitizing agents found in children and adolescents with recalcitrant atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study with a pediatric battery. An Bras Dermatol. 2022;97(3):307-14.

Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:121-30.

Boonstra M, Rustemeyer T, Middelkamp-Hup MA. Both children and adult patients with difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis have high prevalences of concomitant allergic contact dermatitis and are frequently polysensitized. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(9):1554-61.

Boonchai W, Chaiyabutr C, Charoenpipatsin N, Sukakul T. Pediatric contact allergy: A comparative study with adults. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(1):34-40.

Silverberg JI, Patel N, Warshaw EM, DeKoven JG, Atwater AR, Belsito DV, et al. Lanolin allergic reactions: North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience, 2001 to 2018. Dermatitis. 2022;33(3):193-99.

Jacob SE, Herro EM, Sullivan K, Matiz C, Eichenfield L, Hamann C. Safety and efficacy evaluation of TRUE TEST panels 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 in children and adolescents. Dermatitis. 2011;22(4):204-10.

Uldahl A, Engfeldt M, Svedman C. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: a ROAT study. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(1):41-9.

Jacob SE, Amini S. Cocamidopropyl betaine. Dermatitis. 2008;19(3):157-60.

Belloni Fortina A, Fontana E, Peserico A. Contact sensitization in children: a retrospective study of 2,614 children from a single center. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(4):399-404.

Jacob SE, McGowan M, Silverberg NB, Pelletier JL, Fonacier L, Mousdicas N, et al. Pediatric contact dermatitis registry data on contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(8):765-70.

Mortazavi H, Ehsani A, Sajjadi SS, Aghazadeh N, Arian E. Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis. BMC Dermatol. 2016;16(1):10.

Published

01-02-2023

How to Cite

Puangpet, P. ., Boonpuen, N. ., Saipornchai, K. ., Suchaoin, R. ., Poompakdeepan, P. ., & McFadden, J. . (2023). Patch Testing of Thai Children with Eczema. Siriraj Medical Journal, 75(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i2.260740

Issue

Section

Original Article

Categories