Effect of Wearing a Face Mask on the 6-Minute Walk Test in Healthy Volunteers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i12.264856Keywords:
6-Minute Walk Test, Face Mask, Oxygen Saturation, Dyspnea, FatigueAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the influence of wearing different types of face masks on the results of the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) in a cohort of healthy volunteers.
Materials and Methods: Volunteers were partitioned into three groups (each comprising 36 individuals) with different mask-wearing conditions: NIOSH-approved N95 mask, and double-mask scenarios featuring two layers of surgical mask, and a combination of a surgical mask covered by a cloth face mask. Each participant performed two rounds of the 6MWT, one while wearing a mask and another without. Various metrics, such as the six-minute walk distance (6MWD), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and dyspnea and fatigue scores, were measured.
Results: No significant differences were found in the 6MWD results between the mask-wearing and non-mask-wearing scenarios across all the mask types.Strong positive correlations were also established between the 6MWD results in the mask-wearing and non-mask-wearing conditions. However, a small cohort experienced dyspnea significantly more when wearing double surgical masks compared to not wearing a mask. Additionally, there were no major deviations in SpO2 levels or fatigue scores regardless of the type of mask used.
Conclusion: The study indicated that wearing an N95 mask, or double surgical masks, or cloth-over-surgical face masks did not significantly influence the outcomes of the 6MWT in healthy individuals. However, caution is advised in the case of wearing double surgical masks, as this may induce a greater sense of dyspnea. This suggests that face masks can be worn safely during physical fitness and pulmonary function assessments, aligning with their essential role in viral spread prevention in daily life.
References
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111-7.
World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 August 18]; Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
Mishra A, Biswal S, Das S, Padhy RN, Pradhan BB. Social Transmission of Corona Virus: An overview. Siriraj Med J. 2020;72(6):508-11.
Holland A, Spruit M, Troosters R, Puhan MA, Pepin V, Saey D, et al. An official ERS/ATS technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:1428-46.
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS Statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166(1):111-7.
Salles-Rojas A, Guzmán-Valderrábano C, Madrid WA, Gonzalez-Molina A, Silva-Ceron M, Rodriguez-Hernandez C, et al. Masking the 6-Minute Walking Test in the COVID-19 Era. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(6):1070-4.
Just IA, Schoenrath F, Passinger P, Stein J, Kemper D, Knosalla C, et al. Validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients with End-Stage Lung Diseases Wearing an Oronasal Surgical Mask in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Respiration. 2021;100(7):594-9.
Swiatek KM, Lester C, Ng N, Golia S, Pinson J, Grinnan D. Impact of Face Masks on 6-Minute Walk Test in Healthy Volunteers. Pulm Circ. 2021;11(1):2045894020988437.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maximizing Fit for Cloth and Medical Procedure Masks to Improve Performance and Reduce SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Exposure, 2021. [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2021 October 4]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7007e1.htm
Singh SJ, Puhan MA, Andrianopoulos V, Hernandes NA, Mitchell KE, Hill CJ, et al. An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1447-78.
Khamtue K, Sitilertpisan P, Dacha S. Comparative effects of wearing N95, surgical, cloth, and PM2.5 masks during six-minute walk test on dyspnea, breathing effort, oxygen saturation, and functional capacity in pre-aging individuals. Journal of Associated Medical Sciences. 2023;56(2):8-17.
Salles-Rojas A, Guzmán-Valderrábano C, Madrid WA, Gonzalez-Molina A, Silva-Ceron M, Rodriguez-Hernandez C, et al. Masking the 6-Minute Walking Test in the COVID-19 Era. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021;18(6):1070-4.
Dacha S, Chuatrakoon B, Sornkaew K, Sutthakhun K, Weeranorapanich P. Impact of wearing different facial masks on respiratory symptoms, oxygen saturation, and functional capacity during six-minute walk test (6MWT) in healthy young adults. European Respiratory Journal. 2021;58:OA1183. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.OA1183
Radtke KL, Porcari JP, Foster C, Miller M, Helget A. Evaluation of Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Performance with and without a Facemask. Int J Res Ex Phys 2021;16(2):67-80.
Person E, Lemercier C, Royer A, Reychler G. Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance. Rev Mal Respir. 2018;35(3):264-8.
Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Fujita M, et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(2 Pt 1):487-92.
Lacasse Y, Goldstein R, Lasserson TJ, Martin S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD003793.
Fukushi I, Nakamura M, Kuwana SI. Effects of wearing facemasks on the sensation of exertional dyspnea and exercise capacity in healthy subjects. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0258104.
Mairbäurl H. Red blood cells in sports: effects of exercise and training on oxygen supply by red blood cells. Front Physiol. 2013;4:332.
Cabanillas-Barea S, Rodríguez-Sanz J, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Lopez-de-Celis C, Gonzalez-Rueda V, Zegarra-Chavez D, et al. Effects of Using the Surgical Mask and FFP2 during the 6-Min Walking Test. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12420.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Siriraj Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following conditions:
Copyright Transfer
In submitting a manuscript, the authors acknowledge that the work will become the copyrighted property of Siriraj Medical Journal upon publication.
License
Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows for the sharing of the work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the authors and the journal. However, it does not permit modifications or the creation of derivative works.
Sharing and Access
Authors are encouraged to share their article on their personal or institutional websites and through other non-commercial platforms. Doing so can increase readership and citations.