Comparison of Second-Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Indices between Pregnant Women with and without Prior Cesarean Delivery and Effect on Perinatal Outcomes
Uterine Artery Doppler Indices in Pregnancy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i11.269247Keywords:
Uterine artery Doppler indices, cesarean delivery, second trimesterAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of prior cesarean delivery on second-trimester Uterine Artery (UtA) Doppler and its effect on perinatal outcomes.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at the Maternal Fetal Medicine unit of Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Thailand between June 2023 and January 2024. Healthy pregnant women aged between 18 and 45 years old were recruited and divided into prior (PCD) and non-prior cesarean delivery (non-PCD) groups. Both groups underwent UtA Doppler study from 18 to 24 weeks of gestation. UtA Doppler indices consisted of pulsatility index (UtA-PI), resistance index (UtA-RI) and systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D). Demographics, maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected.
Results: Total of 416 participants were recruited and divided equally. The mean age of participants was 30.5 years old. Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy and hypertensive disorder were reported as 18.9 (79/416) and 5.5 (23/416) percent, respectively. From univariate analysis, subjects in the PCD group had higher UtA-PI, UtA-RI and UtA S/D than the non-PCD group with statistical significance. After multiple logistic regressions, only UtA-RI was greater in the PCD group with any statistical significance. The mean gestational age at delivery was 38.41 weeks. Prevalence of small for gestational age deliveries, preeclampsia, and preterm birth were 4.4 (17/376), 3.1 (12/376) and 10 percent (38/376), respectively. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of both groups were comparable. Number of cesarean deliveries, parity, miscarriage, and anterior placentation were not associated with UtA Doppler indices.
Conclusion: UtA-RI of prior cesarean delivery participants were higher than non-prior cesarean delivery participants and not associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.
References
Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J, Mashauri HL. Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(5):e1274.
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8.
Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, Team AS. The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1914-7.
Negishi H, Kishida T, Yamada H, Hirayama E, Mikuni M, Fujimoto S. Changes in uterine size after vaginal delivery and cesarean section determined by vaginal sonography in the puerperium. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1999;263(1-2):13-6.
Kuwata T, Matsubara S, Kaneko Y, Izumi A, Nakata M, Suzuki M. Asymptomatic uterine artery pseudoaneurysm after cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(2):405-10.
Morris H. Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14(1):16-20.
Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):771-8.
Jung E, Romero R, Yeo L, Gomez-Lopez N, Chaemsaithong P, Jaovisidha A, et al. The etiology of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S844-S66.
Cho GJ, Kim LY, Min KJ, Sung YN, Hong SC, Oh MJ, et al. Prior cesarean section is associated with increased preeclampsia risk in a subsequent pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:24.
Pahirah N, Laosooksathit W, Kongsomboon K, Kitporntheranunt M. Sonographic Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Predict Cesarean Scar Defect in Pregnant Women. Siriraj Med J. 2021;73(5):330-6.
Hosiriphon K, Chayachinda C, Keawpoonsub K, Taibowornpitak K, Tuangrattanasirikun D. A Survey of Daily Genital Care Practices among Reproductive-aged Female Personnel at Siriraj Hospital. Siriraj Med J. 2023;75(4):259-65.
Sunsaneevitayakul P, Sompagdee N, Dehghan MA-, Talungchit P. Effect of Gestational Weight Gain on Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women. Siriraj Med J. 2022;74(6):364-70.
Tian Y, Yang X. A Review of Roles of Uterine Artery Doppler in Pregnancy Complications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:813343.
Mary E, Leslie M, Vickie A. Fetal Doppler Assessment (Noncardiac). In: Mary E, editors. Callen's Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017.p.1204-5.
Li N, Ghosh G, Gudmundsson S. Uterine artery Doppler in high-risk pregnancies at 23-24 gestational weeks is of value in predicting adverse outcome of pregnancy and selecting cases for more intense surveillance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(12):1276-81.
Barati M, Shahbazian N, Ahmadi L, Masihi S. Diagnostic evaluation of uterine artery Doppler sonography for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(6):515-9.
Cnossen JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Coomarasamy A, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178(6):701-11.
Torabi S, Sheikh M, Fattahi Masrour F, Shamshirsaz AA, Bateni ZH, Nassr AA, et al. Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in second pregnancy with previous elective cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(13):2221-7.
Isikalan MM, Yeniceri H, Toprak E, Guleroglu FY, Acar A. Effect of previous cesarean sections on second-trimester uterine artery Doppler. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(9):1766-71.
Yapan P, Tachawatcharapunya S, Surasereewong S, Thongkloung P, Pooliam J, Poon LC, et al. Uterine artery Doppler indices throughout gestation in women with and without previous Cesarean deliveries: a prospective longitudinal case-control study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):20913.
Baron J, Hershkovitz R, Baumfeld Y, Imterat M, Sciaky-Tamir Y, Mastrolia SA, et al. Postpartum uterine artery blood flow impedance following cesarean section or vaginal delivery. J Clin Ultrasound. 2016;44(5):278-83.
Flo K, Widnes C, Vartun A, Acharya G. Blood flow to the scarred gravid uterus at 22-24 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2014;121(2):210-5.
Nakai Y, Imanaka M, Nishio J, Maeda T, Ozaki A, Sun TT, et al. Uterine blood flow velocity waveforms during early postpartum course following caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;74(2):121-4.
Borisut P, Kovavisarach E. Standard intrauterine growth curve of Thai neonates delivered at Rajavithi hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97(8):798-803.
Horsager R, Roberts S, Rogers V, et al Williams obstetrics, study guide. New York (NY): McGrawHill Professional; 2014.
Ngamjarus C, Chongsuvivatwong V, McNeil E. n4Studies: Sample size Calculation for an Epidemiological Study on a Smart Device. Siriraj Med J. 2016;68:160-70.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siriraj Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following conditions:
Copyright Transfer
In submitting a manuscript, the authors acknowledge that the work will become the copyrighted property of Siriraj Medical Journal upon publication.
License
Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows for the sharing of the work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the authors and the journal. However, it does not permit modifications or the creation of derivative works.
Sharing and Access
Authors are encouraged to share their article on their personal or institutional websites and through other non-commercial platforms. Doing so can increase readership and citations.