Validation of the Adapted Picture Version of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test for Thais with Dementia

Duangkamol Singwicha; Chatchawan Rattanabannakit; Saowalak Hunnangkul; Atthapon Raksthaput; Sunisa Chaichanettee; Natthamon Wongkom; Pathitta Dujada; Vorapun Senanarong

doi:10.33192/smj.v76i12.270244

Authors

Duangkamol Singwicha Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
Chatchawan Rattanabannakit Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Saowalak Hunnangkul Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Atthapon Raksthaput Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Sunisa Chaichanettee Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Natthamon Wongkom Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Pathitta Dujada Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Vorapun Senanarong Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i12.270244

Keywords:

Dementia, Neuropsychiatric testing, Pyramid and Palm Trees Test, Semantic memory

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to validate Pyramids and Palm Trees test (PPT) in dementia cohort and explore reliability measurement of this test.

Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a cross-sectional study. A total of 30 subjects were recruited from the Memory Clinic at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand: 15 non-dementia adults and 15 dementia patients (mild to moderate stage). In content validation, the picture version of the PPT was given to experts to evaluate the content of the test. According to consensus, some pictures with cultural issues were adapted to be more culturally appropriate. For concurrent validation, the PPT was compared against standard tests (Thai Mental Status Examination (TMSE), Boston Naming Test (BNT), Animal Fluency Test) using Spearman correlation and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. The internal reliability of the PPT was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s Alpha.

Results: Among the 52 pictures in the PPT, 25 pictures were changed. The median score of the PPT was 49 for non-dementia group and 43 for dementia group. The PPT was significantly correlated with the Animal Fluency Test, the BNT, and the TMSE. ROC analysis revealed an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.8. ICC was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.92), and internal consistency was 0.87, indicating good to satisfactory reliability.

Conclusions: The PPT demonstrated good concurrent validity compared to the TMSE, BNT, and Animal Fluency Test in dementia patients. Based on this study, it is recommended as a test for semantic memory in Thai individuals with dementia.

Author Biography

Vorapun Senanarong, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Vorapun Senanarong, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine.

References

Funnell E. Semantic memory. In: Hillis AE, Editor. The handbook of adult language disorders: integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2002.p.185–205.

Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011; 76(11):1006–14.

Botha H, Josephs KA. Primary Progressive Aphasias and Apraxia of Speech. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019;25(1):101–27.

Kintz S, Wright HH. Semantic Knowledge Use in Discourse: Influence of Age. Discourse Process. 2017;54(8):670–81.

Dresang HC, Dickey MW, Warren TC. Semantic memory for objects, actions, and events: A novel test of event-related conceptual semantic knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2019;36(7–8):313–35.

Willits JA, Amato MS, MacDonald MC. Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use. Cogn Psychol. 2015;78:1–27.

Howard D, Patterson K. The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test. A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Thames Valley Company, Bury St. Edmunds, 1992.

Mehri A, Mousavi SZ, Kamali M, Maroufizadeh S. Normative data for the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test in literate Persian adults. Iran J Neurol. 2018;17(1):18–23.

Guo Q, He C, Wen X, Song L, Han Z, Bi Y. Adapting the pyramids and palm trees test and the kissing and dancing test and developing other semantic tests for the Chinese population. Appl Psycholinguist 2014;35(6):1001–19.

Callahan BL, Macoir J, Hudon C, Bier N, Chouinard N, Cossette-Harvey M, et al. Normative Data for the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test in the Quebec-French Population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25(3):212–7.

Klein LA, Buchanan JA. Psychometric properties of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009;31(7):803–8.

Weber M, Van Ancum J, Bergquist R, Taraldsen K, Gordt K, Midolaizak AS, et al. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Community Balance and Mobility scale in young-older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:156.

Dubois B, Villain N, Frisoni GB, Rabinovici GD, Sabbagh M, Cappa S, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations of the International Working Group. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(6):484–96.

Apostolova LG. Alzheimer Disease. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016;22(2 Dementia):419–34.