In Vitro Comparison of the Mechanical and Optical Characteristics of the Storz Flex-XC1 Singleuse Ureteroscope and the Storz Flex-XC Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v77i5.272982Keywords:
Flexible ureteroscopes, reusable, deflection angle, resolution, single useAbstract
Objective: This study compared the mechanical and optical characteristics of the Storz Flex-XC1 single-use ureteroscope and the Storz Flex-XC reusable flexible ureteroscope. The mechanical parameters comprised the upward/downward deflection, loop diameter, and irrigation flow rate. The optical parameters were image resolution and color representation.
Materials and Methods: We conducted an in vitro evaluation of two Karl Storz flexible ureteroscopes. Specifically, we examined the Storz Flex-XC1 single-use and Storz Flex-XC reusable scopes for upward/downward deflection angles, loop diameter, irrigation flow rates, image resolution, and color representation. The Storz Professional Image Enhancement System was also applied.
Results: The Storz Flex-XC reusable ureteroscope achieved greater upward/downward deflection angles than did the Storz Flex-XC1 single-use ureteroscope when a 200 μm laser or a 1.9 Fr tipless basket was used, with mean differences of 1.9°‒2.2° and 2.3°‒5.6°, respectively. No clinically significant difference in loop diameter was found. The Storz Flex reusable scope achieved a higher irrigation flow rate with an empty working channel (mean difference of 2.25 ml/min). Both scopes demonstrated identical image resolutions in air and in a normal saline solution, but the Storz Flex single-use device showed superior color representation.
Conclusion: The Storz Flex-XC reusable flexible ureteroscope displayed slight advantages in terms of the deflection angle and irrigation flow rate. The Storz Flex-XC1 single-use flexible ureteroscope offered improved color representation and marginally better resolution in saline.
References
Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301-20.
Lieske JC, Pena de la Vega LS, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Leibson CL, Ho KL, et al. Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int. 2006;69(4):760-4.
Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T, Soga N, Kameda K, Sriboonlue P, et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int J Urol. 1997;4(6):537-40.
Arunkajohnsak N, Taweemonkongsap T, Leewansangtong S, Srinualnad S, Jongjitaree K, Chotikawanich E. The correlation between demographic factors and upper urinary tract stone composition in the Thai population. Heliyon. 2020;6(8):e04649.
Marshall VF. Fiber Optics in Urology. J Urol. 1964;91:110-4.
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O. Next-Generation Fiberoptic and Digital Ureteroscopes. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46(2):147-63.
Ventimiglia E, Somani BK, Traxer O. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction? Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):113-9.
Phromprathum P, Srinualnad S, Leewansangtong S, Taweemonkongsap T, Phinthusophon K, Jitpraphai S, et al. In vitro Comparison of the Mechanical and Optical Characteristics of 5 Disposable Flexible Ureteroscopes. Urol Int. 2024;108(4):367-76.
Ofstead CL, Heymann OL, Quick MR, Johnson EA, Eiland JE, Wetzler HP. The effectiveness of sterilization for flexible ureteroscopes: A real-world study. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(8):888-95.
Legemate JD, Kamphuis GM, Freund JE, Baard J, Oussoren HW, Spijkerman IJB, et al. Pre-Use Ureteroscope Contamination after High Level Disinfection: Reprocessing Effectiveness and the Relation with Cumulative Ureteroscope Use. J Urol. 2019;201(6):1144-51.
Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, Lee BR. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2347-51.
Schlager D, Hein S, Obaid MA, Wilhelm K, Miernik A, Schoenthaler M. Performance of Single-Use FlexorVue vs Reusable BoaVision Ureteroscope for Visualization of Calices and Stone Extraction in an Artificial Kidney Model. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1139-44.
Grasso M, Bagley D. Small diameter, actively deflectable, flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol. 1998;160(5):1648-53; discussion 1653-4.
Doizi S, Traxer O. Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks. Urolithiasis. 2018; 46(1):47-58.
Mulawkar PM, Sharma G, Tamhankar A, Shah U, Raheem R. Role of Macroscopic Image Enhancement in Diagnosis of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Analytical Review. Front Surg. 2022;9:762027.

Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siriraj Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following conditions:
Copyright Transfer
In submitting a manuscript, the authors acknowledge that the work will become the copyrighted property of Siriraj Medical Journal upon publication.
License
Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows for the sharing of the work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the authors and the journal. However, it does not permit modifications or the creation of derivative works.
Sharing and Access
Authors are encouraged to share their article on their personal or institutional websites and through other non-commercial platforms. Doing so can increase readership and citations.