Validity of a smartphone-based assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters and center of mass displacement during single- and dual-task walking

Main Article Content

Paphawee Prupetkaew
Vipul Lugade
Teerawat Kamnardsiri
Patima Silsupadol

Abstract

                Background: Development of new techniques to assess gait in the free-living environment is necessary.  Nowadays, the use of smartphone technology for medical purposes is becoming popular due to its cost-effectiveness, portability, and variety of built-in sensors.


                Objectives: To assess the validity of a smartphone-based accelerometer to measure spatiotemporal gait parameters and center of mass (CoM) displacement during single- and dual-task walking, compared with a motion capture system.


                Methods: Twenty-four healthy young and older adults were asked to walk at their self-selected speed over a 10-m walkway under single-task normal walking and four dual-task walking conditions. To evaluate validity, gait parameters (i.e. step time, step length, gait velocity, cadence, and CoM displacement) derived from a smartphone and a motion capture system were analyzed using Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r).


                Results: A smartphone-based accelerometer demonstrated high to very high concurrent validity with a motion capture system for all spatiotemporal gait parameters during single-task walking (r = 0.789 - 0.990, p < 0.001) and dual-task walking (r = 0.789 811 - 0.990, p < 0.001). For vertical CoM displacement, a smartphone-based accelerometer demonstrated moderate (r = 0.563, p < 0.001) and moderate to high (r = 0.588 - 0.745, p < 0.001) correlations during single - and dual-task walking, respectively. 


                Conclusion: The smartphone-based accelerometer is valid for the quantification of gait during both single- and dual-task walking. Thus, there is a great potential of using a smartphone to assess gait in the clinic and community.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Prupetkaew P, Lugade V, Kamnardsiri T, Silsupadol P. Validity of a smartphone-based assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters and center of mass displacement during single- and dual-task walking. Thai J Phys Ther [internet]. 2019 Feb. 28 [cited 2026 Jan. 16];41(1):42-53. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjpt/article/view/125932
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Lord S, Galna B, Verghese J, Coleman S, Burn D, Rochester L, Independent domains of gait in older adults and associated motor and nonmotor attributes: validation of a factor analysis approach, J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013; 68:820–827.

2. Verghese J, Wang C, Lipton RB, Holtzer R, Xue X. Quantitative gait dysfunction and risk of cognitive decline and dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:929-35.

3. Hirvensalo M, Rantanen T, Heikkinen E. Mobility difficulties and physical activity as predictors of mortality and loss of independence in the community-living older population. J Am Geriatr SO. 2000;48:493-8.

4. Maki BE. Gait changes in older adults: predictors of falls or indicators of fear. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:313-20.

5. Hardy SE, Perera S, Roumani YF, Chandler JM, Studenski SA. Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1727-34.

6. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, et al. Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults. JAMA.2011;305:50-8.

7. Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Hahn ME, Brey RH. Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. Gait Posture 2003;18:125–33.

8. Gutierrez EM, Bartonek A, Haglund-A kerlind V, Saraste H. Centre of mass motion during gait in persons with myelomeningocele. Gait Posture. 2003;18:37-46.

9. Furrer M, Bichsel L, Niederer M, Baur H, Schmid S. Validation of a smartphone-based measurement tool for the quantification of level walking. Gait Posture. 2015;42:289-94.

10. Kim A, Kim J, Rietdyk S, Ziaie B. A wearable smartphone-enabled camera-based system for gait assessment. Gait Posture. 2015;42:138-44.

11. Silsupadol P, Teja K, Lugade V. Reliability and validity of a smartphone-based assessment of gait parameters across walking speed and smartphone locations: Body, bag, belt, hand, and pocket. Gait Posture. 2017;58:516-22.

12. Hartmann A, Murer K, de Bie RA, de Bruin ED. Reproducibility of spatio-temporal gait parameters under different conditions in older adults using a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system. Gait Posture. 2009;30:351-55.

13. Kavanagh JJ, Menz HB. Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28:1-15.

14. Agostini V, Lo Fermo F, Massazza G, Knaflitz M. Does texting while walking really affect gait in young adults? J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:86.

15. Lugade V, Lin V, Chou L. Center of mass and base of support interaction during gait. Gait Posture.2011;33:406-11.

16. Mukaka M. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J.2012;24:69–71.

17. Lamberg EM, Muratori LM. Cell phones change the way we walk. Gait Posture. 2012;35:688-90.