Development of ERCP Care Model: A Transitional Nursing Model in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Lampang Hospital

Authors

  • Sudthida Inprasit Perioperative Nursing Department, Lampang Hospital, Lampang province, Thailand
  • Wijitra Jitman Perioperative Nursing Department, Lampang Hospital, Lampang province, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60099/jtnmc.v41i04.281255

Keywords:

transitional nursing care model, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), postoperative complications, anxiety, quality of care

Abstract

Introduction The incidence of biliary and pancreatic diseases has been increasing worldwide, including in Thailand. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a therapeutic procedure for managing biliary and pancreatic disorders; however, it carries a complication risk of approximately 5–10%, including pancreatitis, bleeding, and infection. The operating theater at Lampang Hospital initiated ERCP services in fiscal year 2023. Since its implementation, challenges have been observed during the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural phases, as well as in cases of unplanned hospital readmission prior to scheduled follow-up. These issues highlight gaps in transitional care for patients undergoing ERCP. Therefore, the researchers developed a transitional nursing care model for patients undergoing ERCP. 

Objective This study aimed to develop a transitional nursing care model for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Lampang Hospital. 

Design This Research and Development employed the ADDIE model as the major conceptual framework for developing the transitional nursing care model. The process consisted of four phases: the analysis phase, which involved assessing the situation, identifying problems and obstacles, and determining the needs for transitional nursing care among patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Lampang Hospital; the design and development phase, which focused on constructing the model, verifying its quality, and refining its components; the implementation phase, which entailed piloting the model and examining its outcomes in practice; and finally, the evaluation phase, which assessed the effectiveness of the model.

Methodology Phase 1 involved brainstorming sessions on patient care for those undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the operating theater at Lampang Hospital. Participants were divided into two groups: 1) key informants, consisting of six multidisciplinary team members, one gastrointestinal surgeon, one nurse anesthetist, two operating room nurses, one inpatient ward nurse, and one surgical outpatient nurse; and 2) five patient representatives who had undergone ERCP. Data were collected using a personal information questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, which informed the drafting of the initial model. In Phase 2, the draft model was subjected to quality validation by five experts, piloted with ten patients, and subsequently refined to yield a new model entitled the ERCP Care Model. Phase 3 involved implementing the newly developed model. The sample comprised 20 operating room nurses responsible for ERCP patient care and 60 patients scheduled for ERCP, divided equally into control and experimental groups (30 participants each). Sample size was determined using the G*Power program. Research instruments included the ERCP Care Model, developed based on Naylor et al.’s transitional care framework, a nursing practice manual, patient and family educational leaflets, and an ERCP checklist. Data collection instruments consisted of a patient knowledge test (IOC = .80; KR-20 = .75), a nurse knowledge test (IOC = .80; KR-20 = .77), an anxiety assessment scale (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, α = .87), a complication record form, and a satisfaction questionnaire (IOC = 1.00; α = .81). All instruments were validated by five experts. In this phase, outcomes before and after implementation were compared, including patient and nurse knowledge, patient anxiety, and incidence of complications. Finally, Phase 4 evaluated the model in terms of satisfaction among both patients and nurses. Data collection was conducted between June 2025 and January 2026. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Paired t-test, Independent t-test, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, and Chi-square test.

Results The situational analysis revealed that ERCP patient care lacked a systematic guideline, patient and family education was inconsistent, team roles were not clearly defined, and post-discharge follow-up was insufficient. Based on these findings, the transitional nursing care model was developed, validated, and refined to yield the ERCP Care Model, which comprises four core components: E: Engagement & Education, providing knowledge and fostering patient and family participation; R: Responsibility & Readiness, defining responsibilities and preparing the multidisciplinary team; C: Continuity of Care, ensuring seamless care throughout the treatment pathway; and P: Patient Well-being & Prevention, promoting health and preventing complications. Following implementation, patients in the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher post-test knowledge scores compared with the control group (M = 14.50, SD = 2.30 vs. M = 10.40, SD = 2.10; p < .01). Among nurses, knowledge scores increased significantly from M = 11.30 (SD = 1.72) to M = 14.00 (SD = 0.97) (Z = -3.983, p < .001). Experimental group had significantly lower anxiety scores than controls (M = 41.33, SD = 4.87 vs. M = 51.17, SD = 5.41; p < .001). Although complication rates were lower in the experimental group (20.00%) compared with the control group (36.67%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = .252). Patient satisfaction with the model was rated at the highest level (M = 4.85, SD = 0.37), consistent with nurse satisfaction (M = 4.81, SD = 0.40).

Recommendations The ERCP Care Model enhanced the quality of patient care by increasing patient knowledge and reducing anxiety, strengthening nurses’ competencies, and achieving high levels of satisfaction among stakeholders. Moreover, it demonstrated a trend toward reducing post-procedural complications. Therefore, the ERCP Care Model should be adopted as a standard nursing practice guideline in operating rooms for patients undergoing ERCP. In addition, it has potential for adaptation to other endoscopic interventions and same-day surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dai F, Cai Y, Yang S, Zhang J, Dai Y. Global burden of gallbladder and biliary diseases (1990–2021) with healthcare workforce analysis and projections to 2035. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25(1):249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03842-x PMID: 40221715

Wang F, Hu D, Sun H, Yan Z, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of digestive diseases: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1202980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1202980 PMID: 37693711

Li X, Zhang Y, Yan Z, Jiang W, Rui S. Global, regional and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors from 2019 to 2021, with projection to 2044. Front Oncol. 2025;14: 1521788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1521788 PMID: 39876895

Su J, Liang Y, He X. Global, regional, and national burden and trends analysis of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer from 1990 to 2019 and predictions to 2030: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Front Med. 2024;11:1384314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1384314 PMID: 38638933

Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency For Research On Cancer; 2024. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today

Bureau of Medical Technical and Academic Affairs, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health. Recommendations for the development of the service system ODS (One Day Surgery) [in Thai]. Bangkok: Printing Office, The War Veterans Organization of Thailand Under Royal Patronage of His Majesty the King; 2017.

Promtai P. Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones at Kalasin Hospital. Journal of Environmental Education Medical and Health. 2023;8(2):220–8. Available from: https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hej/article/view/265516 (in Thai)

Özcan Ö, Arikan S. Determining the risk factors of complications due to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51666. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51666 PMID: 38313949

Barakat M, Saumoy M, Forbes N, Elmunzer BJ. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2025;169(2): 230–43. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.009 PMID: 40120770

Lampang Hospital, Operating Room. Statistics of ERCP patients, fiscal year 2023–2024. Lampang: Lampang Hospital; 2024. (in Thai)

Naylor MD, Shaid EC, Carpenter D, Gass B, Levine C, Li J, et al. Components of comprehensive and effective transitional care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65(6):1119–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14782 PMID: 28369722

Hirschman KB, Shaid E, McCauley K, Pauly MV, Naylor MD. Continuity of care: the Transitional Care Model. Online J Issues Nurs. 2015;20(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No03 Man01 PMID: 26882510

Somluk T. Effects of transitional care program on knowledge and self-care behaviors of post-cardiac surgery patients. Thai Journal of Cardio-thoracic Nursing. 2020;33(1):167–82. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journalthaicvtnurse/article/view/251300 (in Thai)

Clark DR. ADDIE model [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2025 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/sat.html

Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1976. p. 3–12.

Kongsuk T. Sample size calculation [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.thaidepression.com/www/doc58/5.Sample%20size%202.pdf

Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Education Objective, Hand Book 1: Cognitive Domain. David Mokey; 1971.

Spielberger CD. The nature and measurement of anxiety. In: Spielberger CD, Diaz-Guerrero R, editors. Cross-cultural anxiety. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1976. p. 3–12.

Srinil B. Teaching materials on business research design, data collection, questionnaire design, and sampling. Chiang Mai: Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University; 2017. (in Thai)

Markovich L, Sela Y, Grinberg K. Continuity of care across hospital-to-community transitions: a narrative review integrating concepts, measurement, and nursing-relevant approaches. Healthcare. 2026; 14(5):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14050656 PMID: 41827610

Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17): 1822–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.17.1822 PMID: 17000937

Earl T, Katapodis N, Schneiderman S. Care transitions. In: Hall KK, Shoemaker-Hunt S, Hoffman L, et al., editors. Making healthcare safer III: A critical analysis of existing and emerging patient safety practices [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Mar. Chapter 15. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555516/

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.

Elgmal MS, Hasanin AA, Badran HM. Effect of nursing instructions on knowledge and anxiety of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Mansoura Nursing Journal. 2025 Jan 1;12(1). https://doi.org/10.21608/mnj.2024.309960.1427

Xiao X, Li J. Effect of modified accompanying video education plus continuous nursing on psychological emotion and disease knowledge mastery of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Afr Health Sci. 2025;25(2):289–97. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v25i2.35 PMID: 40837634

Lu Y, Wang F. Effect of programmed nursing plan based on thinking map guidance mode on hemodynamics and intestinal function recovery of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Emerg Med Int. 2022;2022:6555150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6555150 PMID: 35607398

Benner P. From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1984.

Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. What is accountability in health care? Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(2):229–39. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-124-2-199601150-00007 PMID: 8533999

Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: the challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001; 323(7313):625–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625

Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.12.1743 PMID: 3045356

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

1.
Inprasit S, Jitman W. Development of ERCP Care Model: A Transitional Nursing Model in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Lampang Hospital. J Thai Nurse Midwife Counc [internet]. 2026 Sep. 18 [cited 2026 Sep. 19];41(04):671-89. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJONC/article/view/281255

Issue

Section

Research Articles