Development of DMSc COVID-19 real-time RT-PCR

Authors

  • Pilailuk Akkapaiboon Okada National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Warawan Wongboot National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Thanutsapa Thanadachakul National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Siripaporn Puygun National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Sirichol Kala National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Wandee Meechalard National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Sunthareeya Waichroen National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Malinee Chittaganpitch Medical Sciences Technical Office, Department of Medical Sciences
  • Ballang Uppapong National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences

Keywords:

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, real-time RT-PCR

Abstract

         Development of diagnostic tests for detection of emerging infectious agents in patients, contact cases and high-risk group is critical for disease control and early effective treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop DMSc COVID-19 real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of RdRp and N gene which are specific for SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19, to evaluate a simplified extraction-free methods (heat and direct lysis) and to evaluate effects of five enhancers; Tween 20 (0.5%), Glycerol (10, 15, 20%), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (10%), Bovine serum albumin (BSA) (10 mg/mL) and Triton X-100 (0.1%) on amplification efficiency. The results demonstrated that the real-time RT-PCR assay had analytical sensitivity to detect RdRp and N gene at 50 and 5 virus copies per reaction, respectively. Among extraction-free methods, heat and direct lysis showed diagnostic sensitivity of 97.14 and 100% and specificity of 95.89 and 94.52% respectively. Enhancer mixes composed of Tween 20 (0.5%) and Glycerol (15%) increased diagnostic sensitivity and specificity up to 100%. Our study revealed that the DMSc COVID-19 real-time RT-PCR assay could be used to amplify RNA without extraction process. This assay could serve as a rapid and cost-effective diagnostic method to increase capacity of COVID-19 detection for monitoring and diagnostic purposes.

References

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report – 146: data as received by WHO from national authorities by 10:00 CEST, 14 June 2020. [online]. 2020; [cited 2020 Jun 14]; [17 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.who.int/docs/defaultsource/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200614-covid-19-sitrep-146.pdf?sfvrsn=5b89bdad_6.

Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DKW, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 2020; 25(3): 2000045. (8 pages).

Tu YF, Chien CS, Yarmishyn AA, Lin YY, Luo YH, Lin YT, et al. A review of SARS-CoV-2 and the ongoing clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21(7): 2657. (19 pages).

Chittaganphich M. COVID-19. Bull Dept Med Sci 2020; 62(1): 1-5.

Chen Y, Chen L, Deng Q, Zhang G, Wu K, Ni L, et al. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol 2020; 92(7): 833-40.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) real-time RT-PCR diagnostic panel. [online]. 2020; [cited 2020 May 15]; [59 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download.

Okada P, Buathong R, Phuygun S, Thanadachakul T, Parnmen S, Wongboot W, el al. Early transmission patterns of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in travellers from Wuhan to Thailand, January 2020. Euro Surveill 2020; 25(8). 2000097. (5 pages).

Johnson G, Nolan T, Bustin SA. Real-time quantitative PCR, pathogen detection and MIQE. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 943: 1-16.

World Health Organization. real-time RT-PCR protocol for the detection of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus. [online]. 2013; [cited 2020 May 15]; [6 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/cnic_realtime_rt_pcr_protocol_a_h7n9.pdf.

Harada S. DNA and RNA extractions from mammalian samples. In: Micic M. Sample preparation techniques for soil, plant, and animal samples. New York Springer Science Business Media; 2016. p. 125-138.

Van Stralen KJ, Stel VS, Reitsma JB, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy. Kidney Int 2009; 75(12): 1257-63.

Vogels CBF, Brito AF, Wyllie AL, Fauver JR, Ott IM, Kalinich CC, et al. Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-COV-2 qRT-PCR primer-probe sets. medRxiv. [serial online]. 2020; [cited 2020 May 15]; XX(XX): [20 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/04/26/2020.03.30.20048108.full.pdf.

Shatzkes K, Teferedegne B, Murata H. A simple, inexpensive method for preparing cell lysates suitable for downstream reverse transcription quantitative PCR. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 4659. (7 pages).

Grant PR, Turner MA, Shin GY, Nastouli E, Levett LJ. Extraction-free COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis by RT-PCR to increase capacity for national testing programmes during a pandemic. bioRxiv. [serial online]. 2020; [cited 2020 May 15]; XX(XX): [6 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.06.028316v1.full.pdf.

Montgomery JL, Wittwer CT. Influence of PCR reagents on DNA polymerase extension rates measured on real-time PCR Instruments. Clin Chem 2014; 60(2): 334–40.

Downloads

Published

25-09-2020

How to Cite

1.
Akkapaiboon Okada P, Wongboot W, Thanadachakul T, Puygun S, Kala S, Meechalard W, Waichroen S, Chittaganpitch M, Uppapong B. Development of DMSc COVID-19 real-time RT-PCR. ว กรมวิทย พ [internet]. 2020 Sep. 25 [cited 2025 Dec. 19];62(3):143-54. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dmsc/article/view/245897

Issue

Section

Original Articles