Acute Allergic-Like Reaction To Intravenous Non-ionic Iodinated Contrast Material In Patients Who Underwent Computed Tomography

Authors

  • Teeraphan Bootphaew Krabi Hospital

Keywords:

Acute allergic-like reaction, Non-ionic iodinated contrast material, Computed tomography

Abstract

      The author retrospectively reviewed incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reaction related to intravenous administration of non-ionic iodinated contrast material in patients who underwent computed tomography in Krabi General Hospital during January 2010 to September 2014. Type of acute allergic-like reaction, severity of reaction and patient outcome were reviewed. The medical records were reviewed for pertinent medical history related to each reaction, including previous contrast material reaction, premedication before administration of intravenous iodinated contrast material, previous allergic-like reaction to drugs or substances other than contrast material and history of asthma. Five thousand nine hundred and four intravenous administrations of low-osmolality non-ionic iodinated contrast material were performed during the time period specified. Acute allergic-like reactions to contrast material were documented in 24 (0.4%) of patients. Twenty-two (91.7%) of acute allergic-like reaction were categorized as mild and two (8.3%) as moderate. No deaths were attributed to intravenous non-ionic iodinated contrast material. The most of acute allergic-like reactions (91.7%) occurred in adult age group. The difference of reaction rates in adult, pediatric and elderly patients was statistically significant (p<0.05). Greater risk of allergic-like reaction exists in association with female gender (p<0.05). In conclusion, the incidence of acute allergic-like reactions to intravenous administration of low-osmolality non-ionic iodinated contrast material is very low and most reactions are mild degree. The use of intravenous administration of low-osmolality non-ionic iodinated contrast material during computed tomography is quite safe.

References

Brasch RC. Allergic reactions to contrast media: accumulated evidence. AJR 1980; 134(4): 797–801

Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR 1991; 157(6): 1153–61.

แสงงาม วงษ์อนุชิตเมธา, รุ่งนภา ทรงสิริพันธุ์, สิริวรรณ หวังวโรดม, สุรีรัตน์ ตั้งสง่าศักดิ์ศรี. Intensive ADR monitoring of radio-contrast medium in Hatyai Hospital. ใน : การประชุมวิชาการงานเฝ้าระวังความปลอดภัยจากการใช้ยาเรื่อง Pharmacovigilance: for Patient Safety. วันที่ 2-3 กรกฎาคม 2551. ณ ห้องแกรนด์ บอลรูม โรงแรม ดิ เอมเมอรัลด์ ถนนรัชดาภิเษก กรุงเทพมหานคร. 2551.

Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990; 175(3): 621-8.

Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB, Santini LC, Lang EK, Gerber FH, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med 1987; 317(14): 845-9.

Cutroneo P, Polimeni G, Curcuruto R, Calapai G, Caputi AP. Adverse reactions to contrast media: an analysis from spontaneous reporting data. Pharmacol Res 2007; 56: 35-41.

Namasivayam S, Kalra MK, Torres WE, Small WC. Adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media: an update. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2006; 35(4): 164-9.

Bettmann MA, Morris TW. Recent advances in contrast agents. Radiol Clin North Am 1986; 24(3): 347-57.

Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR 2001; 176(6): 1385-8.

Bettmann MA, Holzer JF, Trombly ST. Risk management issues related to the use of contrast agents. Radiology 1990; 175(3): 629-31.

Dillman JR, Strouse PJ, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Jan SC. Incidence and severity of acute allergic-like reaction of IV nonionic iodinated contrast material in children. AJR 2007; 188(6): 1643-7.

Almen T. The etiology of contrast medium reactions. Invest Radiol 1994; 29(suppl 1): S37-45.

Gooding CA, Berdon WE, Brodeur AE, Rowen M. Adverse reactions to intravenous pyelography in children. AJR 1975; 123(3): 802-4.

Mortelé KJ, Olivia MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR 2005; 184: 31-4.

Lang DM, Alpern MD, Visintainer PF, Smith ST. Gender risk for anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 95(4): 813-7.

Yocum MW, Khan DA. Assessment of patients who have experienced anaphylaxis: a 3-year survey. Mayo Clin Proc 1994; 69: 16-23.

Stark BJ, Sullivan TJ. Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis. J Allery Clin Immunol 1986; 78: 76-83.

Wong S, Dykewicz MS, Patterson R. Idiopathic anaphylaxis: a clinical summary of 175 patients. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150(6): 1323-8.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2015

How to Cite

1.
Bootphaew T. Acute Allergic-Like Reaction To Intravenous Non-ionic Iodinated Contrast Material In Patients Who Underwent Computed Tomography. ว กรมวิทย พ [internet]. 2015 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Apr. 21];57(3):293-30. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dmsc/article/view/242537

Issue

Section

Original Articles