Effectiveness of Mammogram Combined with Ultrasound in Palpable Breast Abnormalities in Krabi Hospital

Mammogram Combined Ultrasound in Palpable Breast Abnormalities

Authors

  • Saranya Leelaprasart Radiology Division, Krabi Hospital

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Mammogram, Ultrasound, BI-RADS

Abstract

         Breast cancer is a major health problem for women around the world. The most common symptom is feeling a lump in the breast. Mammography and ultrasound are accepted as the standard diagnostic tests with high accuracy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combined mammogram and ultrasound in patients with palpable breast lumps in Krabi Hospital, as well as the associated factors for breast cancer. Data were collected retrospectively of all women who underwent mammograms and ultrasounds for palpable breast lumps between January 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023. The study cohort included 259 patients presenting with 272 palpable lumps. Benign versus malignant outcomes were determined by pathologic analysis or 12-month clinical or imaging follow-up. The analysis used applies statistics, Chi-square, and odd ratio with 95% confidence for a correlation with breast cancer. Results revealed a higher prevalence of breast cancer in higher age groups. None in the BI-RADS 1, 2 and 3 groups had a malignant tumor, while those in the BI-RADS 4 and 5 groups had malignant tumor rates of 57.5% and 100%, respectively; 93.4% of all breast cancer cases were identified on both mammograms and ultrasounds. The effectiveness for combined mammogram and ultrasound was high, 100% for sensitivity, 88% for specificity, 77.6% for positive predictive value and 100% for negative predictive value. Factors that increased the risk of breast cancer in this study were age ≥ 40 years and lesion size ≥ 2 cm; and BI-RADS 5 group had a higher risk than BI-RADS 4 group. The mammogram combined with ultrasound in Krabi Hospital had comparable high effectiveness with other studies. Imaging has an important role in diagnosis, treatment plan and avoiding unnecessary procedures in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(3): 209-49.

Ferlay J, Colombet M, Bray F. Cancer incidence in five continents, CI5plus: IARC CancerBase no. 9. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. [online]. 2018; Available from: http://ci5.iarc.fr

Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancers by indication for examination for 363,048 diagnostic mammography examinations from 2004–2008: based on BCSC data through 2009.

Chan CH, Coopey SB, Freer PE, Hughes KS. False negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 153: 699–702.

Shetty MK, Shah YP, Sharman RS. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 263–8.

Moy L, Slanetz PJ, Moore R, Satija S, Yeh ED, McCarthy KA, et al. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology 2002; 225: 176–81.

Dennis MA, Parker SH, Klaus AJ, Stavros AT, Kaske TI, Clark SB. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology 2001; 219: 186–91.

Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, Whitman GJ, Feldman MI, Madjar H, et al. Acr bi-rads® ultrasound. ACR bi-rads® atlas,breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.

Koo MM, von Wagner C, Abel GA, McPhail S, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Typical and atypical presenting symptoms of breast cancer and their associations with diagnostic intervals: evidence from a national audit of cancer diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol 2017; 48: 140-6.

Chaudhuri M, Sen S, Sengupta J. Breast lumps: a study of 10 years. J Indian Med Assoc 1995; 93: 455–7.

Fleming NT, Armstrong BK, Shiner HJ. The comparative epidemiology of benign breast lumps and breast cancer in Western Australia. Int J Cancer 1982; 30: 147–52.

Harvey JA, Mahoney MC, Newell MS, Bailey L, Barke LD, D’Orsi C, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria: palpable breast masses. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10: 742–9.

Parikh JR. ACR appropriateness criteria on palpable breast masses. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4: 285–8.

Moss HA, Britton PD, Flower CD, Freeman AH, Lomas DJ, Warren RM. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 676–82.

Lehman CD, Lee CI, Loving VA, Portillo MS, Peacock S, DeMartini WB. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30–39 years of age. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 1169–77.

Leung SE, Ben-Nachum I, Kornecki A. New palpable breast lump with recent negative mammogram: is repeat mammography necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 200–4.

สุขุมาลย์ สิงหพันธ์. ค่าการพยากรณ์บวกของการรายงานผลตรวจแมมโมแกรม BIRADS 4 และ 5 ในโรงพยาบาลทุ่งสง. ว วิชาการแพทย์เขต 11 2556; 7(3): 375-81.

ชัชมานันทน์ สิงหะการ. ประสิทธิผลของการรายงานผลตรวจมะเร็งเต้านมด้วยแมมโมแกรม BIRADS 4 และ5 โรงพยาบาลพังงา. ว วิชาการแพทย์เขต 11. 2564; 35(1): 113-23.

ภูวสิษฏ์ ตรีจักรสังข์, สมเกียรติ สรรพวีรวงศ์, ศรีลา สำเภา, ปัทมา ธนอนันตรักษ์, รัศมี สังข์ทอง. ค่าวิเคราะห์ของการรายงานผลแบบไบแรดส์ในโรงพยาบาลสงขลานครินทร์. สงขลาครินทร์เวชสาร. 2554; 29(4): 155-61.

Muttarak M, Srivichai K, Chaiwun B, Sukhamwang N. The breast imaging reporting and data system-BI-RADS: positive predictive value of category 4 and 5 lesions. Chiang Mai Med J 2010; 49(3): 111-6.

Wiratkapun C, Bunyapaiboonsri W, Wibulpolprasert B, Lertsithichai P. Biopsy rate and positive predictive value for breast cancer in BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions. J Med Assoc Thai 2010; 93(7): 830-7.

American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2005-2006. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2005.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Leelaprasart S. Effectiveness of Mammogram Combined with Ultrasound in Palpable Breast Abnormalities in Krabi Hospital: Mammogram Combined Ultrasound in Palpable Breast Abnormalities. ว กรมวิทย พ [internet]. 2024 Dec. 28 [cited 2025 Dec. 28];66(4):420-9. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dmsc/article/view/269462

Issue

Section

Original Articles