Development of DNA Extraction Method from Dried Blood Spots for Genetic Analysis

Authors

  • Kannikar Punnapum Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Pawinee Innark Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Rotjanapan Pankanjanato Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Onanong Jaruan Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Maliwan Numnuan Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Ratchaneekorn Jaisue Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Wiroj Puangtabtim Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Charintip Yenyuvadee Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Pundharika Piboonsiri Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
  • Hansa Thaisri Medical Life Science Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand

Keywords:

Dried blood spot (DBS), DNA extraction, Magnetic beads, Next generation sequencing

Abstract

         Genetic analysis using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology is an important tool in medical genetics, enabling precise and comprehensive diagnosis of genetic disorders. It has played an increasingly significant role in newborn screening. This study aimed to develop a DNA extraction method from dried blood spots (DBS) to obtain DNA with sufficient quality and quantity for the detection of hearing loss using Targeted Next Generation Sequencing. Three extraction methods were compared: a commercial extraction kit, a magnetic bead-based method combined with an in-house lysis buffer, and a magnetic bead-based method with a commercial lysis buffer. The results showed that DNA extracted from all three methods had an average concentration of 5.28–6.88 ng/µL, purity ratios (A260/A280) ranging from 1.97–2.08, and (A260/A230) ranging from 0.2–1.33. DNA integrity numbers (DIN) were between 8.8–9.9. PCR amplification using both singleplex and multiplex assays produced target fragments of 233–570 bp as expected. NGS data generated by the DNA Nanoball Sequencing (DNBSEQ-E25) platform from MGI demonstrated high sequencing quality, with mapping quality of 99.85–99.87%, 30× coverage of 97.13–99.25%, duplicate rate of 7.87–9.11%, and base call accuracy (Q30) of 90.21–90.72%. This study demonstrates that the magnetic bead-based extraction method combined with an in-house lysis buffer provides DNA yield and quality comparable to the commercial extraction kit, and is suitable for NGS-based genetic analysis for hearing loss screening.

References

McDade TW, Williams S, Snodgrass JJ. What a drop can do: dried blood spots as a minimally invasive method for integrating biomarkers into population-based research. Demography 2007; 44(4): 899-925.

Mei JV, Zobel SD, Hall EM, Jesus VR, Adam BW, Hannon WH. Performance properties of filter paper devices for whole blood collection. Bioanalysis 2010; 2(8): 1397-403.

Adam BW, Hall EM, Sternberg M, Lim TH, Flores SR, O’Brien S, et al. The stability of markers in dried-blood spots for recommended newborn screening disorders in the United States. Clin Biochem 2011; 44(17-18): 1445-50.

Chace DH, Kalas TA, Naylor EW. Use of tandem mass spectrometry for multianalyte screening of dried blood spot specimens from newborns. Clin Chem 2003; 49(11): 1797-817.

Adam BW, Alexander JR, Smith SJ, Chace DH, Loeber JG, Elvers LH, et al. Recoveries of phenylalanine from two sets of dried-blood-spot reference materials: prediction from hematocrit, spot volume, and paper matrix. Clin Chem 2000; 46(1): 126-8.

Tuaillon E, Kania D, Pisoni A, Bollore K, Taieb F, Ontsira Ngoyi EN, et al. Dried blood spot tests for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of HIV and viral hepatitis B and C. Front Microbiol 2020; 11: 373. (7 pages).

Doornekamp L, Embregts CWE, Aron GI, Goeijenbier S, van de Vijver DAMC, van Gorp ECM, et al. Dried blood spot cards: a reliable sampling method to detect human antibodies against rabies virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020; 14(10): e0008784. (10 pages).

Sun H, Shen XR, Fang ZB, Jiang ZZ, Wei XJ, Wang ZY, et al. Next-generation sequencing technologies and neurogenetic diseases. Life 2021; 11(4): 361. (17 pages).

Gallo V, Dotta L, Giardino G, Cirillo E, Lougaris V, D'Assante R, et al. Diagnostics of primary immunodeficiencies through next-generation sequencing. Front Immunol 2016; 7: 466. (10 pages).

Elsink K, Huibers MMH, Hollink IHIM, Simons A, Zonneveld-Huijssoon E, van der Veken LT, et al. Implementation of early next generation sequencing for inborn errors of immunity: a prospective observational cohort study of diagnostic yield and clinical implications in dutch genome diagnostic centers. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 780134. (11 pages).

Veldman A, Kiewiet MBG, Heiner-Fokkema MR, Nelen MR, Sinke RJ, Sikkema-Raddatz B, et al. Towards next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based newborn screening: a technical study to prepare for the challenges ahead. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8(1): 17. (11 pages).

Remec ZI, Trebusak Podkrajsek K, Repic Lampret B, Kovac J, Groselj U, Tesovnik T, et al. Next-generation sequencing in newborn screening: a review of current state. Front Genet 2021; 12: 662254. (11 pages).

Jiang S, Wang H, Gu Y. Genome sequencing for newborn screening—an effective approach for tackling rare diseases. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6(9): e2331141. (3 pages).

Rudowski S, Boerkoel CF, He M, Kanungo S. Whole genome sequencing in era of newborn screening. OBM Genetics 2023; 7(4): 2304195. (13 pages).

Smith L, Willis MJ, Feigenbaum A, Scharer G, Mardach R, Hansen C, et al. Genome-to treatment and begin newborn genome screening: a review of system guides for the acute management and newborn screening follow-up of genetic disorders in infants and children. Med Res Arch. [serial online]. 2023; 11(10): [cited 2026 Jan 12]; [20 screens]. Available from: URL: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i10.4528.

Shen G, Li W, Zhang Y, Chen L. Next-generation sequencing based newborn screening and comparative analysis with MS/ MS. BMC Pediatr 2024; 24: 230. (7 pages).

Kingsmore SF, Wright M, Smith LD, Liang Y, Mowrey WR, Protopsaltis L, et al. Prequalification of genome-based newborn screening for severe childhood genetic diseases through federated training based on purifying hyperselection. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111: 2618-42.

Kingsmore S, Wright M, Olsen L, Schultz B, Protopsaltis L, Averbuj D, et al. Genome-based newborn screening for severe childhood genetic diseases has high positive predictive value and sensitivity in a NICU pilot trial. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111: 2643–67.

Boemer F, Fasquelle C, d’Otreppe S, Josse C, Dideberg V, Segers K, et al. A next-generation newborn screening pilot study: NGS on dried blood spots detects casual mutations in patients with inherited metabolic diseases. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 17641. (9 pages).

Hendrix MM, Cuthbert CD, Cordovado SK. Assessing the performance of dried-blood-spot DNA extraction methods in next eneration sequencing. Int J Neonatal Screen 2020; 6: 36. (15 pages).

QIAGEN. QIAamp DNA kits for DNA extraction. [online]. 2025; [cited 2026 Jan 12]; [97 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.qiagen.com/us/products/discovery-and-translational-research/dna-rna-purification/dna-purification/genomic-dna/qiaamp-dna-kits?catno=51304.

รจนาพรรณ ปั้นกาญจนโต, ภาวิณี อินนาค, มะลิวัลย์ นุ่มนวล, ธีระยุทธ สมบุญ, สุภาพร นามมูลน้อย, นวลจันทร์ วิจักษณ์จินดา และคณะ. การกลายพันธุ์ของยีนฟีนิลอะลานีนไฮดรอกซีเลสในทารกไทยที่สงสัยเป็นโรคฟีนิลคีโตนูเรีย. ว กรมวิทย พ 2565; 64(4): 223-6.

National Library of Medicine. Homo sapiens phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH), RefSeqGene on chromosome 12. [online]. 2025; [cited 2026 Jan 12]. Available from: URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NG_008690.2.

Kapa Biosystems. KAPA2G fast multiplex PCR kit. [online]. 2016; [cited 2026 Jan 12]; [4 screens]. Available from: URL: https://ngenetics.com/files/co/Documents/manual/kapa_12664.pdf.

Twist Bioscience. Twist target enrichment fast hybridization protocol: for use with the twist NGS workfl ow [online]. 2025; [cited 2026 Jan 12]; [22 screens]. Available from: URL: https://www.twistbioscience.com/content/dam/twistbioscience/resources/2026-01/DOC-001066-Protocol-FastHyb-REV6-singles-compressed.pdf.

Pan S, Gu B, Wang H, Yan Z, Wang P, Pei H, et al. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis by real-time PCR and its clinical application in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Thorac Dis 2013; 5(3): 251-7.

Na B, Park J, Park S, Park E, Jang J, Kim YH, et al. Comparison evaluation of bacterial DNA extraction methods for improved molecular diagnostic accuracy of sepsis-causing pathogens in clinical whole blood samples. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 4167. (6 pages).

Zamuner FT, Ramos-López A, García-Negrón A, Purcell-Wiltz A, Cortés-Ortiz A, Cuevas AR, et al. Evaluation of silica spin column and magnetic bead formats for rapid DNA methylation analysis in clinical and point of care settings. Biomed Rep 2024; 21: 112. (11 pages).

Gall-David SL, Boudry G, Buffet-Bataillon S. Comparison of four DNA extraction kits efficiency for 16SrDNA microbiota profiling of diverse human samples. Future Sci OA 2023; 9(1): FS0837. (12 pages).

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Dried blood spot specimen collection for newborn screening. 7th ed. CLSI standard NBS01. Malvern, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021.

Downloads

Published

29-09-2026

How to Cite

1.
Punnapum K, Innark P, Pankanjanato R, Jaruan O, Numnuan M, Jaisue R, et al. Development of DNA Extraction Method from Dried Blood Spots for Genetic Analysis. ว กรมวิทย พ [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 29 [cited 2026 Oct. 31];68(3):565-77. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dmsc/article/view/280051

Issue

Section

Original Articles