Changes in the VARK Learning Style from the First to the Second Preclinical Year of Medical Students: A Follow-up Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study in a Thai Medical School

Punyapat Maprapho; Chantacha  Sitticharoon; Pailin Maikaew; Vasu Lertsiripatarajit; Issarawan Keadkraichaiwat; Nipith Charoenngam

doi:10.33192/smj.v75i3.260867

Authors

Punyapat Maprapho Siriraj Health Science Education Excellence Center, Education Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
Chantacha Sitticharoon Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
Pailin Maikaew Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
Vasu Lertsiripatarajit Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
Issarawan Keadkraichaiwat Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
Nipith Charoenngam Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i3.260867

Keywords:

VARK, preclinic, learning preference, academic performance

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine percentage of students who changed (change group) and did not change (no-change group) in the visual (V)–aural (A)–reading/writing (R)–kinesthetic (K) learning style from the first (Preclinic1) to the second (Preclinic2) preclinical year; and compare academic performance (GPA, percentile of GPA, and achievement of study targets) and stress levels between these groups.

Materials and Methods: The VARK and research questionnaires were sent to students of the 2019 class at the end of Preclinic1 and again at Preclinic2. GPA and percentile of GPA were obtained from academic records while achievement of study targets and stress levels were from the research questionnaires.

Results: Most students were multimodal learners (65.03% in Preclinic1 and 69.51% in Preclinic2). From Preclinic1 to Preclinic2, 69.3% of students changed and 30.7% of students did not change their learning preference. In Preclinic1 and Preclinic2, GPA and percentile of GPA were higher in the no-change compared with the change group (p<0.01 all). GPA in the change group was lower in Preclinic2 than that in Preclinic1 (p<0.001). Achievement of study targets and stress levels of the change group in Preclinic2 were lower than theirs in Preclinic1 and those of the no-change group in Preclinic2 (p<0.05 all). The students who changed their learning preference might need to adapt to their new learning preference probably leading to lower academic capability but less stress.

Conclusion: Students changed their learning preference around 70% from Preclinic1 to Preclinic2. The change group exhibited lower academic capability but less stress.

References

Biggs J. From Theory to Practice: A Cognitive Systems Approach. Higher Education Research & Development. 1993;12(1):73-85.

Prithishkumar IJ, Michael SA. Understanding your student: using the VARK model. J Postgrad Med. 2014;60(2):183-6.

Dryden G, Vos J. The learning revolution : to change the way the world learns. Torrance, Calif.: The Learning Web; 1999.

Fleming ND, Mills C. Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. 1992;11(1):137-55.

Othman N, Amiruddin M. Different Perspectives of Learning Styles from VARK Model 2010. 652–60 p.

Drago WA, Wagner R. Vark preferred learning styles and online education 2004. 1-13 p.

Murphy RJ, Gray SA, Straja SR, Bogert MC. Student learning preferences and teaching implications. J Dent Educ. 2004;68(8):859-66.

Armstrong A. Instructional Design in the Real World: A View from the Trenches: Information Science Pub.; 2004.

Farkas GJ, Mazurek E, Marone JR. Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: Which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course? Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):121-31.

Keefe JW. Learning style: theory and practice. Reston, Va.: National Association of Secondary School Principals; 1987.

Alkhasawneh IM, Mrayyan MT, Docherty C, Alashram S, Yousef HY. Problem-based learning (PBL): assessing students' learning preferences using VARK. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(5):572-9.

Baykan Z, Nacar M. Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(2):158-60.

Sarabi-Asiabar A, Jafari M, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S, Zaboli R, Peyman H, et al. The relationship between learning style preferences and gender, educational major and status in first year medical students: a survey study from iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(1):e18250.

Good JP, Ramos D, D'Amore DC. Learning style preferences and academic success of preclinical allied health students. J Allied Health. 2013;42(4):81-90.

Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y. Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait–Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2009;70(2):323-39.

Lertwilaiwittaya P, Sitticharoon C, Maikaew P, Keadkraichaiwat I. Factors influencing the National License Examination step 1 score in preclinical medical students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(3):306-16.

Aldosari MA, Aljabaa AH, Al-Sehaibany FS, Albarakati S. Learning style preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, evaluated using the VARK questionnaire. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:179-86.

Panambur S, Nambiar V, Heming T. Learning style preferences of preclinical medical students in oman. Oman Med J. 2014;29(6):461-3.

Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C. Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:42.

Almigbal TH. Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(3):349-55.

Narayanan S, Ananthy V. The influence of learning style in understanding analogies and 2D animations in embryology course. Anat Cell Biol. 2018;51(4):260-5.

Khanal L, Giri J, Shah S, Koirala S, Rimal J. Influence of learning-style preferences in academic performance in the subject of human anatomy: an institution-based study among preclinical medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:343-55.

Breckler J, Joun D, Ngo H. Learning styles of physiology students interested in the health professions. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009;33(1):30-6.

Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(1):13-6.

Sitticharoon C, Srisuma S, Kanavitoon S, Summachiwakij S. Exploratory study of factors related to educational scores of first preclinical year medical students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2014;38(1):25-33.

Raksadawan Y, Sitticharoon C, Charoenngam N, Maikaew P, Keadkraichaiwat I. Factors influencing academic achievement in preclinical students. International Educational Research. 2020;3(3):8.

Kharb P, Samanta PP, Jindal M, Singh V. The learning styles and the preferred teaching-learning strategies of first year medical students. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(6):1089-92.

Liberman IY, Shankweiler D, Liberman AM. The alphabetic principle and learning to read. Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle. International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities monograph series, No. 6. Ann Arbor, MI, US: The University of Michigan Press; 1989.p.1-33.