The outcome of colon cleaning by Swiff 2 times with Soap Suds Enema and Swiff 3 times with non-Soap Suds Enema before colonoscopy among patients with colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Objective: to study outcome of colon cleaning by swiff 2 times with soap suds enema and swiff 3 times with non-soap suds enema before colonoscopy among patients with colorectal cancer screening.
Methods: study design of this study was descriptive study. All data were collected from medical records of patients who were received colon cleaning. Of 72 patients used swiff 2 times with soap sud Enema (SSE) and 58 patients were swiff 3 time with non-SSE before colonoscopy during July 2017 at Department of Surgery, Roi ET Hospital, Roi Et Province, Thailand. The statistical analyses were used descriptive statistics included percentage, mean and standard derivation.
Results: of 72 patients with swiff 2 times with SSE. Most of them were female 62.50 % with mean age 59.98 years (+SD=6.35). The colonoscopy revealed found colon very poor 1.38 %, poor 12.50 %, fair 37.50 %, good 47.22 % and excellent 1.38 % and found polyp 43.06 %, hemorrhoid 6.94 %, diverticulitis 5.56 % and tubular adenoma 1.39 %. Among 58 patients of swiff 3 times with non-SSE most of them were male 51.72 % with mean age 60.45 years (+SD=6.35). The colonoscopy were found colon poor level 1.72 %, fair 17.24 %, good 62.06 % and excellent 18.96 % and found normal 37.93%, polyp 50.00 %, hemorrhoid 1.72 %, diverticulitis 8.62 % and carcinoma 1.72 %.
Conclusion: this study found out that the percentage of clear colon of swiff 3 times with non-SSE before colonoscopy higher than swiff 2 times with SSE.
Keywords: Colonoscopy; Soap suds enema; Colon
References
Pongnikorn D, Daoprasert K, Waisri N, Laversanne M, Bray F. Cancer incidence in northern Thailand: Results from six population-based cancer registries 1993-2012. Int J Cancer ;2017: 11
Virani S, Bilheem S, Chansaard W, Chitapanarux I, Daoprasert K, Khuanchana S, et al. National and Subnational Population-Based Incidence of Cancer in Thailand: Assessing Cancers with the Highest Burdens. Cancers ; 2017. 17:9
Sarakarn P, Suwanrungruang K, Vatanasapt P, Wiangnon S, Promthet S, Jenwitheesuk K, et al. Joinpoint Analysis Trends in the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Khon Kaen, Thailand (1989 – 2012). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP ; 2017 :1(8) 1039–43.
Gu M-J, Huang Q-C, Bao C-Z, Li Y-J, Li X-Q, Ye D, et al. Attributable causes of colorectal cancer in China. BMC Cancer; 2018 :18 -38.
Hughes LAE, Simons CCJM, van den Brandt PA, van Engeland M, Weijenberg MP. Lifestyle, Diet, and Colorectal Cancer Risk According to (Epi)genetic Instability: Current Evidence and Future Directions of Molecular Pathological Epidemiology. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep ; 2017 : (13) 455–69.
Mullany LE, Herrick JS, Wolff RK, Stevens JR, Samowitz W, Slattery ML. MicroRNA-transcription factor interactions and their combined effect on target gene expression in colon cancer cases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 2017 : 11 (8).
Falkowski S, Woillard J-B, Postil D, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Terrebonne E, Pariente A, et al. Common variants in glucuronidation enzymes and membrane transporters as potential risk factors for colorectal cancer: a case control study. BMC Cancer 2017 ;17:901.
Effects of interactions between common genetic variants and smoking on colorectal cancer. - PubMed - NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258461
Douma KFL, Aalfs CM, Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Smets EM. An E-Learning Module to Improve Nongenetic Health Professionals’ Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Genetic Risk: Feasibility Study. JMIR Med Educ ; 2017 : 3e24.
de Moura DT, Guedes H, Tortoretto V, Arataque TP, de Moura EG, Román JP, et al. [Comparison of colon-cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy-comparative of solutions of mannitol and sodium picosulfate]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru Organo Of Soc Gastroenterol Peru; 2016 : 36 293–7.
Fan X-P, Zhu Q, Zhou Y-J, Ma T, Xia C-X, Huang H-L. Comparative Study of Three Regimens of Bowel Preparation Before Transabdominal Ultrasonography of the Colon. Ultrasound Med Biol ;2016 : 42 (2) 140–5.
Martens P, Bisschops R. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Acta Gastro-Enterol Belg ; 2014 :7 (7) 249–55.
Pontone S, Palma R, Panetta C, Eberspacher C, Angelini R, Pironi D, et al. A pilot study analyzing a 1-liter polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation before colonoscopy for selected inpatients. J Dig Dis 2017 ; 21: (1)59-67
Khorasanynejad R, Norouzi A, Roshandel G, Besharat S. Bowel Preparation for a Better Colonoscopy Using Polyethylene Glycol or C-lax: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Middle East J Dig Dis 2017 :9(2):12–7.
Mytyk A, Lazowska-Przeorek I, Karolewska-Bochenek K, Kakol D, Banasiuk M, Walkowiak J, et al. Clear-Liquid Versus Low-Fibre Diet in Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in Children: A Randomized Trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ;2017: (6)256-68
van Lieshout I, Munsterman ID, Eskes AM, Maaskant JM, van der Hulst R. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. United Eur Gastroenterol J ; 2017 (5) :917–43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
วารสารนี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของโรงพยาบาลมหาสารคาม
