Electrodiagnosisfindings in Guillain- Barré syndrome
Abstract
Introduction : Patients withGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) usually present with acute flaccid paralysis. For good outcome, severely affected patients need early and specific treatment. Electrodiagnosis study is a tool for diagnosis, differentiating GBS subtypes and predict outcome of GBS.
Objective : To identify electrodiagnosis findings and classify GBS subtypes using electrodiagnostic criteria.
Material and methods : A retrospective descriptive study enrolled GBS patients admitting in KhonKaenhospital and underwent electrodiagnostic study (EDx) between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2018 was done. Demographic data, clinical data and electrodiagnosis data were obtained from patient’s medical record.
Results : 94 patients with GBS were recruited, 52 were male and 42 were female. Their mean age was 45.1 ±19.2 years. Clinical presentations were tetraparesis(92.6%), glove and stocking numbness (75.5%) and dyspnea and ventilator needed(26.6%). GBS disability score at admission was 3.9 ± 0.8. GBS disability score before discharge was 3.5 ± 1.4. Eight patients died (8.5%). Most common EDx finding is an abnormal motor nerve conduction study 92.6% (87patients). Needle EMG study was perform in 81 patients and 29.6% showed signs of axonal denervation. GBS subtypes classified by electrodiagnostic criteria demonstrated axonal GBS 51.1%, Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy 30.9%, equivocal 10.6% and normal 7.4%.
Conclusions : An axonal GBS subtype is the most common type of GBS in KhonKaen hospital. Early electrodiagnostic study within the first 7 days after onset of symptoms is useful for diagnosis and classify GBS subtypes.
Keywords : Guillain- Barré syndrome, Electrodiagnosis
References
McGrogan A, Madle GC, Seaman HE, de Vries CS. The Epidemiology of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Worldwide. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;32:150-63.
Kuwabara S. Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Drugs. 2004;64(6):597-610.
Fokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, Walgaard C, van Doorn P, Jacobs B. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain. 2013;137(1):33-43.
Areeyapinan P, Phanthumchinda K. Guillain-Barre Syndrome: A Clinical Study in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93(10):1150-4.
Ekwitayawechnukul C. Guillain-Barre Syndrome in Lampang Hospital. Lampang Med J. 2010;31(3):105-14.
Ruengwongroj P. Electrodiagnosis study of guillain – Barré syndrome inchiangrai regional hospital. Chiangrai Medical journal. 2013;5(1):9-21.
Kulkantrakorn K, Sukphulloprat P. Outcome of Guillain–Barré Syndrome in Tertiary Care Centers in Thailand. J ClinNeuromusc Dis. 2017;19(2):51-6.
Willison H, Jacobs B, van Doorn P. Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet. 2016;388(10045):717-27.
Cortese I, Chaudhry V, So Y, Cantor F, Cornblath D, Rae-Grant A. Evidence-based guideline update: Plasmapheresis in neurologic disorders: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011;76(3):294-300.
Bae JS, Yuki N, Kuwabara S, Kim JK, Vucic S, Lin CS, et al. Guillain–Barré syndrome in Asia. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:905-11.
Zaitoun AM, Kamel A, Aziz SA, Azem HA, Salah H. Early Clinical and Electrodiagnostic Assessment of GuillainBarré Syndrome: Predictors for Prognosis. Egypt J NeurolPsychiatNeurosurg. 2009;46(1):169-76.
Kim CT, Strommen JA, Johns Js, Weiss JM, Weiss LD, Williams FH, et al. Neuromuscular rehabilitation and electrodiagnosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3 Suppl 1):S28-32
Miller RG, Peterson GW, Daube JR, Albers JW. Prognostic value of electrodiagnosis in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Muscle & Nerve. 1988;11(7):769-74.
McKhann GM. Guillain-Barré syndrome: clinical and therapeutic observations. Ann Neurol. 1990;27(suppl):S13-6.
Hughes RA, Newson-Davis JM, Perkin GD, Pierce JM. Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet. 1978;2:750-3.
Rajabally Y, Durand MC, Mitchell J, Orlikowski D, Nicolas G. Electrophysiological diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome subtype: could a single study suffice? J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:115–9.
Uncini A, Ippoliti L, Shahrizaila N, Sekiguchi Y, Kuwabara S. Optimizing the electrodiagnostic accuracy in Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes: criteria sets and sparse linear discriminant analysis. ClinNeurophysiol. 2017;128:1176–83.
Amin B, Meghnathi H, Gajjar MD, Patel T, Vanani J, Gupta N et al. Impact of Electrophysiological and Clinical Variants, and Timing of Plasmapheresis on Outcome of Guillain-Barré Syndrome. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65(11):14-5.
Uncini A, Manzoli C, Notturno F, Capasso M. Pitfalls in electrodiagnosis of Guillain - Barré syndrome subtypes. J NeurrolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(10):1157-63.
Uncini A, Kuwabara S. Electrodiagnostic criteria for Guillain - Barré syndrome: a critical revision and the need for an update. ClinNeurophysiol. 2012;123(8):1487- 95.
Wali A, Kanwar D, Khan SA, Khan S. Early electrophysiological findings in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy variant of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the Pakistani population - a comparison with global data. J PeripherNerv Syst. 2017;22(4):451-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
วารสารนี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของโรงพยาบาลมหาสารคาม