การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบวิธีแก้ไขภาวะเปลือกตาตก Repair of Blepharoptosis by frontalis muscle techniques with suture กับ Repair of Blepharoptosis by resection or advancement of levator muscle aponeurosis techniques
Keywords:
Blepharoptosis, Congenital blepharoptosis, Required blepharoptosisAbstract
Introduction : Blepharoptosis is common in ophthalmogy practice. Congenital blepharoptosis and Acquire blepharoptosis should corrected to improve visualization.
Objective : To compare between Repair of Blepharoptosis by frontalis muscle techniques with suture, Repair of Blepharoptosis by resection or advancement of levator muscle aponeurosis techniques
Methods : A retrospective analysis study, all patients with blepharoptosis 107 cases between 2018-2020. The data was collrected from medical records.
Results : Effectiveness of both methods has no clinical significant. Both methods has the same operative costs. The cost per effectiveness and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio show that Repair of Blepharoptosis by frontalis muscle techniques with suture has higher cost per effectiveness.
Conclusion : Repair of Blepharoptosis by frontalis muscle techniques with suture has advantage when compare to Repair of Blepharoptosis by resection or advancement of levator muscle aponeurosis techniques in hospital perspective.
References
เอกสารอ้างอิง/บรรณานุกรม
Tarjani Vivek Dave. Outcomes of Frontalis Sling Versus Levator Resection in Patients With Monocular Elevation Deficiency Associated Ptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;35(3):251-255
Dae Hwan Park. Comparison of levator resection and frontalis muscle transfer in the treatment of severe blepharoptosis. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2007 ;59(4):388-92.
Smith B, McCord CD, Baylis H. Surgical treatment of blepharoptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:92–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4978399/
Sakol PJ, Mannor G, Massaro BM. Congenital and acquired blepharoptosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10:335–9.
Guercio JR, Martyn LJ. Congenital malformations of the eye and orbit. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40:113–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ben Simon GJ, Macedo AA, Schwarcz RM, Wang DY, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: Evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:877–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Betharia SM. Frontalis sling: A modified simple technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:443–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ramirez OM, Pena G. Frontalis muscle advancement: A dynamic structure for the treatment of severe congenital eyelid ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1841–9. discussion 1850–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hatt M, Anderson RL. Ptosis surgery: Anterior approach for levator aponeurosis shortening. Ophthalmologica. 1979;179:94–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jordan DR, Anderson RL. The aponeurotic approach to congenital ptosis. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;21:237–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cates CA, Tyers AG. Outcomes of anterior levator resection in congenital blepharoptosis. Eye (Lond) 2001;15:770–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Anderson RL, Dixon RS. The role of Whitnall's ligament in ptosis surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:705–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Anderson RL, Jordan DR, Dutton JJ. Whitnall's sling for poor function ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1628–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mercandetti M, Putterman AM, Cohen ME, Mirante JP, Cohen AJ. Internal levator advancement by Muller's muscle-conjunctival resection: Technique and review. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:104–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Escalas P. Ptosis treated by resection of the Muller muscle: Analysis of a series of 51 patients. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:908–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
จริยา เลิศอรรฆยมณี และอุบลรัยน์ สันตวัตร. งานวิจัยประเมินเศรษฐศาสตร์คลินิก.ใน: จริยา เลิศอรรฆยมณี, ประดิษฐ์ สมประกิจ, อุบลรัยน์ สันตวัตร, บรรณาธิการ. งานวิจัยทางคลินิก. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพ: ไพศาลศิลป์การพิมพ์; 2543.หน้า 51-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
วารสารนี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของโรงพยาบาลมหาสารคาม
