Comparative study between Open Cholecystectomy and Three ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Sriboonruang Hospital, Nongbua Lamphu province: Retrospective Analytical Study

Authors

  • Likhit Ruengcharat Sriboonrung Hospital, Nongbualamphu

Keywords:

Symptomatic gallstone, Open Cholecystectomy, Three-ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract

This retrospective analytical study aimed to compare operation time, intraoperative blood loss, post of pain at 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 24 hrs and 48 hrs and length of hospital stay between Open Cholecystectomy (OC) and Three-ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Three-ports LC) in Sriboonruang hospital Nongbua Lamphu province, Thailand.The samples were 83 cases of symptomatic gallstone patients who operated OC and Three-ports LC due to symptomatic gallstone in Sriboonruang hospital and they were selected by simple random sampling method. Furthermore, these patients were divided in two groups equally. 35 patients were operated by OC and 48 patients were operated by Three-ports LC. Data were collected from medical recordsand analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum, Mann Whitney test andChi-square test. The result showed that the operation time in OC were shorter than Three-ports LC significantly (p<0.001). Variables: intraoperative blood loss, post of pain at 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs, 24 hrs and 48 hrs and length of hospital stay in Three-ports LC were less than OC significantly (p<0.001).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sun H, Tang H, Jiang S, Zeng L, et al. Gender and metabolic differences of gall bladder disease. World J Gastroenteral. 2009;15:1886-1891.

Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, et al. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gall bladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:632-639.

Miquel JF, Covarrubias C, Villaroel L, et al. Genetic epidemiology of cholesterol cholelithiasis among Chlean Hispanics, Ameridians, and Maoris. Gastroenterology 1998;115:937-946.

Xu P, Yin XM, Zhang M, et al. Epidemiology of gall stone in Nanjing City in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi2004;25:928.

Everhart JE, Yeh F, Lee ET, et al. Prevalence of gall bladder disease in American Indian populations: finding from the Strong Heart Study. Hepatology. 2002;35:1507-1512.

Stiltmimankarnt T. Gallstones in autopsy. Siriaijhosp Gas 1966; 18:7-17.

Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Espert JJ, Martinez G, etal. Single-Incision Versus Standard LaparoscopicCholecystectomy:Comperison of Surgical Outcfomes from a Single Institute. J Laparoendose Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:683-6.

วชิระโรจน์พิศาลวงศ์. การส่องกล้องผ่าตัดถุงน้ำดี. วชิรเวชสาร 2534;35:35-38.

Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL. Comparison of early postoperative result for laparoscopic versus standard open choleccysteetomy. Surg GynecolObstet 1992;174 : 114-118.

Bailey RW, Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Scovill WA, Graham SM, Imbembo AL. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1991 ; 214 :531 – 540.

Hannan EL, Imperato PJ, Nenner RP, et al. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in New York State: mprtality, complications, and choice of procedure. Suegery 125:223-231.

Krahenbuhl L, Sclabas G, Wente MN, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. World J Surg 25:1325-1330.

โรงพยาบาลศรีบุญเรือง. รายงานผู้รับบริการผู้ป่วยในจำแนกรายโรค. หนองบัวลำภู: โรงพยาบาลศรีบุญเรือง. 2560.

PortenoyRK & Tanner RM. Pain Management: Theory and Practice.Oxford University Press, Inc. 1996.

Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparisoin of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1996; 347: 989-994.

McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. Lancet 1994; 343: 135-138.

Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study.Arch Sure. 1998 FEB;133(2):173-175.

Suuronen S, Kivivuori A, Tuimala J, et al. Bleeding complication in cholecystectomy: a register syudy of over 22,000 cholecystectomies in Finland. BMC Sure. 2015 Aug 13;15:97.doi:10.1186/s12893-015-0085-2.

Enes H, SemirI, Sefik H, et al. Post operative pain in open vs. laparocdopic cholecystectomy with and without local application of anaesthetic. Med Glas (Zenica). 2011 Aug;8(2):243-248.

HendolinHI, Paakonen ME, et al. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Sure. 2000 May; 166(5):394-399.

Al Hadi FH, Chiedozi LC, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy at Prince Abdulrahman Al Sudairy Hospital, Saudi Arabia. East Afr Med J. 1998 Sep;75(9):536-539.

RubertCP, Higa RA, Farias Fv. Comparison between open and laparoscopic elective cholecystectomy in elderly, in a teaching hospital. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016 Feb;43(1):2-5.

Silverstein A, Costas-Chavarri A, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy: A cost-Effectiveness Analysis at Rwanda Military Hospital. World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1225-1233.

Stoker ME, Vose J, O’Mara P, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. Arch Surg. 1992 May;127(5):589-594; discussion 594-595.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Ruengcharat, L. (2021). Comparative study between Open Cholecystectomy and Three ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Sriboonruang Hospital, Nongbua Lamphu province: Retrospective Analytical Study. Research and Development Health System Journal, 14(3), 233–245. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RDHSJ/article/view/253516