MONOCYTE DISTRIBUTION WIDTH (MDW) FOR INDICATED IN PATIENT SEPSIS
Keywords:
Sepsis, Monocyte distribution width, MDW, Sensitivity, SpecificityAbstract
Sepsis and septic shock are the leading cause of in-hospital death. Early diagnosis and treatment of patients with sepsis reduce mortality significantly. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC) and monocyte distribution width (MDW) were used as sepsis indicator. Increased MDW has been shown a reliable indicator of sepsis detection. This study aimed to evaluate MDW as a biomarker for sepsis. Cross-sectional study was performed between October 2021 and September 2022, medical records of IPD and ED were enrolled. Complete blood count (CBC), MDW, CRP and hemoculture were determined in all patients. Data was tested by using diagnostic statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
508 medical records were screened, hemoculture results presented positive 58.1% and negative 41.9 %. Biomarkers in hemoculture positive cases were CRP 138.4 ± 135.9 mg/dl, WBC 15,592.9 ± 9,952.9 x103/ul and MDW 30.7 ± 10.9. AUROC of MDW, CRP and WBC count were 0.910, 0.770, and 0.762 respectively. For diagnosis of the sepsis, the optimum MDW cut-off was 21.66 with sensitivity 87.46 %, specificity 80.28 %, positive predictive value 86.00 % and negative predictive value 82.21 %. The AUROC curve analysis for the prediction of sepsis between MDW and WBC count showed statistic significant precise and comparable diagnostic sensitivity of the MDW better than WBC count in sepsis cases (p<0.001).
Our data suggested that MDW reflected high performance diagnostic test and useful parameter comparable to conventional markers. The combination of MDW and clinical information improves the diagnostic performance for early sepsis.
References
WHO. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/sepsis#tab=tab_1. Sepsis. 2023.
กองยุทธศาสตร์และแผนงาน กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. รายละเอียดตัวชี้วัดกระทรวงสาธารณสุข ประจำปีงบประมาณ 2566. กรุงเทพมหานคร; 2566: 119–123.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2016; 315(8):801–10.
Thompson K, Venkatesh B, Finfer S. Sepsis and septic shock: current approaches to management. Intern Med J. 2019;49(2): 160–70.
Makic MBF, Bridges E. Managing Sepsis and Septic Shock: Current Guidelines and Definitions. American Journal of Nursing. 2018;118(2): 34–9.
Wile MJ, Homer LD, Gaehler S, Phillips S, Millan J. Manual differential cell counts help predict bacterial infection: A multivariate analysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115(5): 644–9.
Beckman Coulter. Early Sepsis Indicator (ESId) Application Addendum [Internet]. 2020. Available from: www.beckmancoulter.com/techdocs.
Crouser ED, Parrillo JE, Seymour C, Angus DC, Bicking K, Tejidor L, et al. Improved Early Detection of Sepsis in the ED With a Novel Monocyte Distribution Width Biomarker. Chest [Internet]. 2017;152(3):518–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.039
Mukherjee R, Kanti Barman P, Kumar Thatoi P, Tripathy R, Kumar Das B, Ravindran B. Non-Classical monocytes display inflammatory features: Validation in Sepsis and Systemic Lupus Erythematous. Sci Rep. 2015; 5(July): 1–14.
Jo SJ, Kim SW, Choi JH, Choi SP, Lee J, Lim J. Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a useful indicator for early screening of sepsis and discriminating false positive blood cultures. PLoS One. 2022; 17(12 December): 1–13.
Wu J, Li L, Luo J. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Monocyte Distribution Width in Sepsis. J Inflamm Res. 2022; 15(July): 4107–17.
Daniel WW. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. Vol. 44, Biometrics. 1988. 317 p.
Beckman Coulter. CRP Instructions For Use. Vol. May 2017. 2017. 1–8 p.
Malinovska A, Hinson JS, Badaki‐Makun O, Hernried B, Smith A, Debraine A, et al. Monocyte distribution width as part of a broad pragmatic sepsis screen in the emergency department. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022; 3(2): 1–11.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kalasin Provincial Public Health Office

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารศูนย์ดัชนีการอ้างอิงวารสารไทย ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆบทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารศูนย์ดัชนีการอ้างอิงวารสารไทย ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารศูนย์ดัชนีการอ้างอิงวารสารไทย หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากวารสารศูนย์ดัชนีการอ้างอิงวารสารไทยก่อนเท่านั้น