Effectiveness of Super Rapid-Readout Versus Rapid-Readout Biological Indicators in Steam Sterilization: A Case Study in the Central Sterile Supply Department, Mae Fah Luang University Medical Center Hospital

Authors

  • Withaya Chanchai Faculty of Public Health, Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Charoensri Guntawong Central Sterile Supply Department, Medical Center Hospital Mae Fah Luang University

Keywords:

Super Rapid readout biological indicator, Steam sterilization, CSSD, Sensitivity, Sterilization failure detection

Abstract

     Background: Biological indicators (BIs) are essential tools for verifying the effectiveness of steam sterilization processes, particularly in Central Sterile Supply Departments, where accurate and timely confirmation of sterilization cycles is required. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a 5-minute super rapid-readout biological indicator and a 24-minute rapid-readout biological indicator during pre-vacuum steam sterilization at 134 °C in the Central Sterile Supply Department of Mae Fah Luang University Medical Center Hospital. Methods: This comparative experimental study evaluated two types of biological indicators: Brand A, a 5-minute super rapid-readout BI, and Brand B, a 24-minute rapid-readout BI. A total of 600 BI samples were tested. The experiment was conducted under three steam exposure durations: 1, 3, and 5 minutes, representing suboptimal, marginal, and adequate sterilization conditions, respectively. The proportions of positive and negative results between the two products were compared at each exposure duration. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: In the 1-minute cycle,
representing a suboptimal sterilization condition, both biological indicators yielded 100.00% positive
results, with no statistically significant difference between Brand A and Brand B. In the 3-minute cycle, representing a marginal condition and a critical point for assessing BI sensitivity, Brand A yielded 95.00% positive results, whereas Brand B yielded 85.00%. This indicated a 10-percentage-point difference in
sensitivity, which was statistically significant (p = 0.032). In the 5-minute cycle, which represents an adequate sterilization condition, both biological indicators yielded 100.00% negative results, indicating specificity under the experimental conditions. Conclusion: The 5-minute super rapid-readout biological indicator demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than the 24-minute rapid-readout biological indicator in the 3-minute marginal cycle, which is a critical condition for detecting steam sterilization process failure. These findings support the potential suitability of super-rapid-readout BIs for load-by-load quality monitoring in settings that require rapid, highly sensitive verification. However, further studies are needed to evaluate workload, cost, and occupational health implications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rutala WA, Boyce JM, Weber DJ. Disinfection, sterilization and antisepsis: An overview. Am J Infect Control. 2023;51(11S):A3-A12. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2023.01.001

Chanchai W, Anumas P, Chitrachulrattanamanee S, et al. Integrating International Standards for Disinfection and Sterilization to Enhance Patient Safety in Thai Healthcare Facilities. J Chulabhorn Royal Acad. 2026;8(3):292-303. https://he02.tcithaijo.org/index.php/jcra/article/view/279088

Chanchai W, Chitrachulrattanamanee S, Guntawong C, Sukaval K, Somboonthawong C. Standards for Chemical and Biological

Indicators in Sterilization Processes: Enhancing Occupational Health, Safety, and the Work Environment in Hospitals. J Chulabhorn Royal Acad. 2026;8(1):23-37. https://he02.tcithaijo.org/index.php/jcra/article/view/275259

Sangthong K, Soparat P, Moongtui W, Danchaivijitr S. Development of quality indicators for sterilization practices of the central sterile supply department. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(Suppl 10):S128-S132. PMID:16850657

Rutala WA, Jones SM, Weber DJ. Comparison of a rapid readout biological indicator for steam sterilization with four conventional biological indicators and five chemical indicators. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17(7):423-428. doi:10.1086/647333

Vesley D, Nellis MA, Allwood PB. Evaluation of a rapid readout biological indicator for 121 °C gravity and 132 °C vacuum-assisted steam sterilization cycles. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16(5):281-286. doi:10.1086/647108

Schneider PM. Evaluation of a new rapid readout biological indicator for use in 132 °C and 135 °C vacuum-assisted steam sterilization cycles. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(2):e17-e21. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2013.09.015Alfa

MJ, Olson N, DeGagne P, Jackson M. Evaluation of rapid readout biological indicators for 132 °C gravity and 132 °C vacuum-assisted steam sterilization cycles using a new automated fluorescent reader. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(7):388-392. doi:10.1086/502071

Zaman SU, Sadia I, Yasmin N, et al. Application of rapid biological indicators coupled with auto-reader for the quality assurance of surgical instruments after sterilization at a cardiac hospital in Bangladesh. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19428. doi:10.7759/cureus.19428

Rodrigues SB, de Souza RQ, Graziano KU, Erzinger GS, Souza O. Performance evaluation of chemical, biological and physical indicators in the process of sterilization under the effect of non-condensable gases.J Hosp Infect.2021;108:16.doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.005

Miguel EA, Laranjeira PR, Ishii M, Pinto TJA. Analysis of water quality over non-condensable gases concentration on steam used for sterilization. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0274924. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274924

Yu X, Zhang Q, Deng X, et al. A comparative study of four Bowie-Dick test under the condition of pressure steam sterilizer simulating gas leakage. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(50):e23653.doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000023653

Lagos-Palomino L, Rueda-Torres L, Sanchez-Holguin G, Soncco-Llulluy F, Rosales-Rimache J. Performance evaluation of the sterilization process with Bowie & Dick test and biological indicator in the quality control of a blood bank in Peru. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(45):e35293. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000035293

Feeherry FE, Munsey DT, Rowley DB. Thermal inactivation and injury of Bacillus stearothermophilus spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53(2):365 - 370. doi:10.1128/aem.53.2.365-370.1987

Hu R, Chen Y, Hu J, Yi L. Establishing nursing-sensitive quality indicators for the Central Sterile Supply Department: A modified Delphi study. Qual Manag Health Care. 2024;33(4):253- 260. doi:10.1097QMH.0000000000000418

Jing W, Mu Y, Cai Y. Central sterile supply department management quality sensitive index constructed by management mode under the guidance of key point control theory and its effect on CSSD management quality: a retrospective study. Ann Palliat Med. 2022;11(6):2050-2060. doi:10.21037/apm-22-594

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

1.
Chanchai W, Guntawong C. Effectiveness of Super Rapid-Readout Versus Rapid-Readout Biological Indicators in Steam Sterilization: A Case Study in the Central Sterile Supply Department, Mae Fah Luang University Medical Center Hospital. J Chulabhorn Royal Acad [internet]. 2026 Aug. 14 [cited 2026 Aug. 24];8(4):314-25. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jcra/article/view/279331

Issue

Section

Research Articles