Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current abdominal computed tomography for increase the contrast to noise ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis

Main Article Content

Tanasombat Wanapantapornkul

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant hepatic neoplasm. Multiphasic multi detector computed tomography (MDCT) is an efficient technique for determination of HCC, especially hepatic arterial phase images. The purpose of this study was to compare the effective dose and contrast to noise ratio of low tube voltage, high tube current CT technique for HCC detection and the conventional CT technique.
Methods: The retrospective analytic study was conducted among 152 patients who underwent MDCT in Surin Hospital between October 2015 and March 2017. Data analysis was used propensity score matching (PSM), student t-test and p-value<0.05.
Results: The CNR significantly increased from 76.33 to 26.69% (26.69%, p-value =0.0452) with low tube voltage, high tube current CT technique and the effective dose significantly decreased 6.59 to 3.5 mSv (46.9%, p-value<0.001).
Conclusion: The CNR increased and the effective dose reduced by using low tube voltage, high tube current CT technique for the HCC detection.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wanapantapornkul, T. (2018). Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current abdominal computed tomography for increase the contrast to noise ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 32(3), 185–193. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/121993
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Sherman M. The radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2010; 105:610-2.
2. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53:1020-2.
3. Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP, Rockette HE., Jr Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast- enhanced CT imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167:71-7.
4. Baron RL, Oliver JH, Dodd GD, Nalesnik M, Holbert BL, Carr B. Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. Radiology. 1996; 199:505-11.
5. Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 2008; 248:995-1003.
6. Marin D, Nelson RC, Samei E, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Boll DT et al. Hypervascu- lar liver tumors: low tube voltage high tube current multidetector CT during late hepatic arterial phase for detection. Radiology June 2009; Volume 251: Number 3.
7. Nakaura T, Awai K, Oda S, Funama Y, Harada K, Uemura S, et al. Low- kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings. AJR. 2011; 196:1332-8.
8. Waaijer A, Prokop M, Velthuis BK, Bakker G, Kort GA, Leeuwen MS. Circle of willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality-reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. Radiology 2007; 242:832-9.
9. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 2005; 237:945-951.