Emergency postpartum hysterectomy: a comparrison of postpartum and cesarean hysterectomy

Main Article Content

Yupapron Wijakkhanalun

Abstract

Background: Emergency postpartum hysterectomy is often performed for life threatening obstetric conditions, such as intractable hemorrhage or severe uterine infection those failed to conservative management. It included both postpartum hysterectomies that are done after vaginal delivery and cesarean hysterectomies, those that are done after cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study was to compare the difference of emergency postpartum hysterectomy in both groups.
Objective: To evaluate the incidence, maternal characteristics, outcome of delivery and hysterectomy, cause of emergency postpartum hysterectomy and complication of hysterectomy.
Research Design: A retrospective analytical study.
Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surin Hospital.
Material and methods: Forty-seven pregnant women GA>28 weeks who underwent emergency postpartum hysterectomy within 24 hours after delivery at Surin Hospital during October 1, 2003 and September 30, 2010 were examined. Information obtained included a complete medical records and operating room registration records. Comparisons were made between postpartum and cesarean hysterectomy. For statistical analysis p-valve from Fisher Exact Test.
Result: There were 47 cases of emergency postpartum hysterectomy (15 postpartum hyster
ectomies and 32 cesarean hysterectomies) for a rate of 0.98 : 1,000 deliveries, 0.52 : 1,000 vaginal deliveries and 1.71 : 1,000 cesarean deliveries respectively. Overall, maternal age 32.94± 4.73 years gestational age 37.68 ± 2.96 weeks. The most common primary indication for hysterectomy was uterine atony (57.5%), follow by uncontrolled bleeding (17%) but pathological finding 46.8% was placenta adherent follow by gravid uterus 25.5%. The operation performed at nighttime 68.1%. Average operating time was 74.13 ± 28.21 minutes, average estimated blood loss was 2,606.38± 1,247.15 mL, average blood transfusion was 1,574.36 ± 1,054.94 mL, average estimated fetal weight was 2,712.34±949.49 grams, and average length of hospitalization was 5.21±1.97 days. A total hysterectomy was performed 61.7% (90.6% in cesarean hysterectomy an none in postpartum hysterectomy p=0.000). Postoperative complications were needed for blood transfusion 100% follow by respiratory support (on ETT and admitted in ICU) 27.7% Die 25.5% statistically significant difference between postpartum and cesarean hysterectomy (46.7% and 15.6% respectively p=0.034). Two maternal mortality were founded a day after hysterectomy.
Conclusion: Placenta adherent was the most common cause of emergency postpartum hysterectomy in both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Die was founded in postpartum hysterectomy more than cesarean hysterectomy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wijakkhanalun, Y. (2018). Emergency postpartum hysterectomy: a comparrison of postpartum and cesarean hysterectomy. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 26(1), 48–59. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/131209
Section
Original Articles

References

Yalingkaya A, Guzel AL, Kangal K. Emer gency peripartum hysterectomy: 16 year experience of a medical hospital, J Chin Med Assoc 2010 ; 73(7):360-3.

Zolop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD, Safon LE, Saltzman DH. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynccol 1993; 168:1443-8.

Stanco LM, Schrimmer DB, Paul RH, Mishell DR Jr. Emergency peripartum hysterectomyand associated risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynccol 1993 ; 168-879-83.

Maura K.W, Elena K, Susan D. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy obstet gynecol 2006; 1486-93.

Yamasmit W, Chaithong wongwatthana S. Risk factors for cesarean hysterectomy in tertiary center in Thailand : a case control study. J Obstet Gynecol Res 2009 ; 35(l):60-5.

Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schmahl FW. Association between method of delivery, puerperal complication rate and post partum hystertectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005 ; 272:43-47.

Engelsen I, Albechtsen S, Iversen O. Peripartum hysterectomy incidence and maternal morbidity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80 : 409-412.

Clark SL, Yeh SY. Phelan JP, Bruce S, Paul RH. Emergency hysterectomy for obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65:365-70.

Kacmar J, Bhimani L, Boyd M, Shah-Hosseini R, Peipert J. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:141-5.

Kwee A, Bots MS, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy : A prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 187-92.

Flamm BL. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001 ; 15:81-92.

Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easteling Tr. Association between mode of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 283:2411-16.

Kastner ES, Figueroa R, Garry D, Maulik D. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy : experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:971-5.

Benirschke K, Kaufmann P (eds). Pathology of the Human Placenta. 4th ed. New York, Springer. 2000;554.

Foma F, Miles AM, Jamieson DJ. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy : a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 ; 190:1440-4.

Imudia AN, Hobson DTG, Awonuga AO, et al. Determinants and complications of emergent cesarean hysterectomy : supracervical vs total hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 ; 203(3):221.e1-5