Induction to Delivery Time and Uterine Incision to Delivery Time Effect to Birth Asphyxia in Cesarean Section
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To determine relation between induction to delivery time and uterine incision to delivery time with birth asphyxia in cesarean section.
Design: Observational study
Setting: Burirum hospital.
Method: The patients were operated with cesarean section under general anesthesia, We observed the induction to delivery time and uterine incision to delivery time by anesthetic nurses. The babies were examined with Apgar score in first minute and fifth minute. Relative risk and stratified analysis were used to analyse the data.
Results: There were 22 babies became asphyxia (Apgar score below 7) and 204 babies were normal. The average I.D. time in birth asphyxia group was 10.35 min higher significantly than normal babies group were 8.35 min also in U.D. time were 3.25 and 2.06 min in asphyxia group and normal group respectively. The relative risk for patients that I.D. more than 8 min is 4.22 and in U.D. more than 3 min is 3.61.
Conclusion: The longer duration of I.D. time and U.D. time made newborns increase risk for birth asphyxia but no permanent damage.
Keyword: Induction to delivery time, Uterine incision to delivery time, Birth asphyxia, Cesarean section
Article Details
References
2. Sentos, Alan C, Pederson, Wilda, Finster Mieczysla. Obstetric Anesthesia. In Paul GB, Burce FC, Robert K, eds : Clinical Anesthesia. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia : Lippinott - Raven, 1997 : 1010.
3. Hodges RJH, Bennett JR, Tunstall ME. General anesthesia for operative obstetrics : with special reference to the use of thiopentone and suxamethonium. Br J Anesth 1959;31:152.
4. Barter RH. Cesarean section : Past and present. Hosp. Pract 1967;2:50.
5. Teramo K. Fetal acid-base values during casearean section. Lancet 1968;2:1146.
6. Fothergill RJ, Roberstron A, Bond RA. Neonatal acidaemia related to procoastinatium at caesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol Br Common 1971;78:1010.
7. Datta S, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB, Brown WU Jr, Alper MH. Neonatal effect of prolonged anesthetic Induction for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1981 Sep;58(3):331-5.
8. Crawford JS, James FM, Crawley M . A further study of general anesthesia for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1967;48:661.
9. Shnider SM, Levinson G . Anesthesia for cesarean section In: Shinder SM,Levinson G, eds : Anesthesia for obstetrics. 3 eds. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:211-45.
10. World Health Organization. ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Disease and related health Problem. 10th ed. Geneva : World Health Organization. 1992;94:777.
11. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Use and abuse of the Apgar score. Pediatrics 1996;98:141-2.
12. James FM III, Crawford JS, Hopkineson R .Comparison of general anesthesia and lumbar epidural analgesia for elective cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1977;56:228.
13. Zagorzycki Mt, Brinkmon CR. The effect of general and epidural anesthesia upon neonatal Apgar scores in repeat cesasean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155(5):641.
14. Benson RC, Shubeck F, Clarke WM, Berendes H. Weiss W, Deutschbergen J. Fetal compromise during elective cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;91:645-651.
15. Ong BY, Coten MM, Palahniuk RJ. Anesthesia for cesarean section : Effects on nenates. Anesth Analg 1989;68:270-275.
16. Fox BS, Smith JB, Namba Y, Johnson RC . Anesthesia for cesarean section : further study Am J Obsted Gynecol 1979;133:15-9.
17. Crawford JS, Janes FM 3rd Davies P, Crawley M : A further study of general anesthesia for cesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1976;48:661-7.
