Comparative Study Between Percutaneous and Open Reduction with Kirschner Wire Fixation in Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus Type III

Main Article Content

ภูวดล กิตติวัฒนาสาร

Abstract

Objective: To compare their effects to patients in term of operative time, hospital length of stay, outcome of treatment and cause of injuries
Setting: Orthopaedic department Buriram Hospital
Design: Retrospective study
Method: The records of 56 patients with supracondylar fracture of humerus Gartland type III were retrospective study from March 1st, 2001 to February 28th, 2002. The studies patients were divided into 2 groups. 26 patients in group 1 were treated with open reduction and K-wire fixation while another 30 patients in group 2 were treated with close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation.
Results: The most common cause of injuries were follen (89.2%). The patients in group 1 required longer operative times (32.5 mins and 16.00 mins respectively). This study also suggested that there was a significantly shorter hospital length of stay in group 2 (2.42 and 1.77 days respectively, p<0.002). Flynn’s classification showed no differences outcome of treatment between these two methods.
Conclusion: Closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation in supracondylar fracture of humerus Gartland type 111 was more likely to reduce operative time and hospital length of stay.
Key words: supracondylar fracture; percutaneous K-wire; open reduction with K- wire; Flynn’s classification

Article Details

How to Cite
กิตติวัฒนาสาร ภ. (2020). Comparative Study Between Percutaneous and Open Reduction with Kirschner Wire Fixation in Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus Type III. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 17(2), 45–57. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/236792
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Skaggs David L, Hale Julia M, Bassett Jeffrey, Kaminsky Cornelia, Key Robert M, Tolo Veron T. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children the conseguences of pin placement. J Bone & Joint Surg. Am 2001;83-A:735 - 740.

2. Reitman Richard D, Waters Peter, Millis Michael. Open reduction and internal fixation for supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:157-161.

3. Mehserle Wiallim L, Meehan Peter L. Treatment of the displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus (Type III) with closed reduction and percutaneous cross - pin fixation. J Pediatr Orthop 1991;11:705-711.

4. Shim Jong Sup, Lee Yong - Seuk. Treatment of completely displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children by cross - fixation with three Kirschner wires. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:12-16.

5. Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi F. Systematic pinning of displaced externsion type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children J Bone & Joint Surg Br. 2001;83-B:888-893.

6. France John, Strong Munro. Deformity and function in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children variously treated by closed reduction and splinting, traction, and percutaneous pinning. J Pediatr Orthop 1992;12:494-498.

7. Royce Ronald O, Dutkowsky Joseph P, Kasser James R, Rand Frank R. Neurologic complications after K- wire fixation of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1991;11:191-194.

8. Gordon J Eric, Patton Christopher M. Luhmann Scott J, Bassett George S, Schoenecker Perry L. Fracture Stability after pinning of displaced supracondylar distal humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:313-318.