Comparison of hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) and Complication between Closed Suction Drainage (CSD) and No drainage after Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (UTKA)

Main Article Content

Phongsak Phongthipakorn

Abstract

Background: The clinical necessity of closed suction drainage (CSD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial.
Objective: This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients who received CSD and those who did not, focusing on hospital length of stay (LOS) and blood transfusion rate.
Method: A retrospective review was conducted of TKA procedures performed at Debaratana Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital between October 2017 and September 2022. A total of 230 knees were analyzed and divided into CSD and non-CSD groups. Key outcomes included LOS and postoperative transfusion rates.
Result: Patients (aged 44–85, 88.3% female) commonly had comorbidities including hypertension (62.9%) and diabetes (14.3%). Of the cases, 101 knees (43.9%) received CSD. The CSD group had a significantly longer hospital stay than the non-CSD group (5.6±1.3 vs. 4.8±1.7 days; p<0.001). Transfusion rates showed no significant difference (6.9% vs. 3.1%; p=0.177).
Conclusion: Use of closed suction drainage after unilateral TKA is associated with increased hospitalization duration without a reduction in transfusion rate. Routine use of CSD in this patient population is therefore not recommended.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phongthipakorn, P. (2025). Comparison of hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) and Complication between Closed Suction Drainage (CSD) and No drainage after Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (UTKA). MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 40(3), 609–618. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/277181
Section
Original Articles

References

da Silva RR, Santos AA, de Sampaio Carvalho Júnior J, Matos MA. Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: systematic review. Rev Bras Ortop 2014;49(5):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.09.007.

WAUGH TR, STINCHFIELD FE. Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961;43-A:939-46. PMID: 14040185

Yildiz C, Koca K, Kocak N, Tunay S, Basbozkurt M. Late tourniquet release and drain clamping reduces postoperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2014;10(1):2-5. doi: 10.1007/s11420-013-9363-7.

Mirzatolooei F, Tabrizi A, Gargari MM. A Comparison of the Postoperative Complications between Two Drainage Methods after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2018;6(1):47-51. PMID: 29430495

Esler CN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ. The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85(2):215-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b2.13357.

Wang D, Xu J, Zeng WN, Zhou K, Xie TH, Chen Z, et al. Closed Suction Drainage Is Not Associated with Faster Recovery after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of 80 Patients. Orthop Surg 2016;8(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/os.12247.

Nishitani K, Kuriyama S, Nakamura S, Ito H, Matsuda S. A Multivariate Analysis on the Effect of No Closed Suction Drain on the Length of Hospital Stay in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2019;31(1):25-30. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.18.013.

Kęska R, Paradowski TP, Witoński D. Outcome in primary cemented total knee arthroplasty with or without drain: A prospective comparative study. Indian J Orthop 2014;48(4):404-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.136285.

Lin C, Qi Y, Jie L, Li HB, Zhao XC, Qin L, et al. Is combined topical with intravenous tranexamic acid superior than topical, intravenous tranexamic acid alone and control groups for blood loss controlling after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(51):e5344. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005344.

Sharma GM, Palekar G, Tanna DD. Use of closed suction drain after primary total knee arthroplasty - an overrated practice. SICOT J 2016;2:39. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2016034.

Mannová J, Kubát P, Pospíchal M, Longin P. [Evaluation of Efficacy of Systemic Administration of Tranexamic Acid (Exacyl) in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Prospective Cohort Study]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2019;86(2):118-23. PMID: 31070570

Muñoz M, Leal-Noval SR. Restrictive transfusion triggers in major orthopaedic surgery: effective and safe? Blood Transfus 2013;11(2):169-71. doi: 10.2450/2013.0276-12.

Parker MJ, Roberts CP, Hay D. Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(6):1146-52. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200406000-00005.

Al-Zahid S, Davies AP. Closed suction drains, reinfusion drains or no drains in primary total knee replacement? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94(5):347-50. doi: 10.1308/003588412X13171221590098.

Bjerke-Kroll BT, Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS, Christ AB, Gladnick BP, Mayman DJ. The increased total cost associated with post-operative drains in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014;29(5):895-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.027.

Quinn M, Bowe A, Galvin R, Dawson P, O'Byrne J. The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2015;39(4):653-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2455-2.

Yang D, Liu K, Fan L, Xu T, Li G. Closed suction drainage offers no more clinical benefit than non-drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty with the administration of tranexamic acid in Chinese patients. Arthroplasty 2020 ;2(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00035-7.

Xu H, Xie J, Lei Y, Huang Q, Huang Z, Pei F. Closed suction drainage following routine primary total joint arthroplasty is associated with a higher transfusion rate and longer postoperative length of stay: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1211-0.

Maliarov A, Newman N, Sabouret P, Al-Shakfa F, Chergui S, Lavoie F. Suction drainage in total knee replacement does not influence early functional outcomes or blood loss: a randomized control trial. Arthroplasty 2023;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00158-z.

Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, Crook DW. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty. Effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;(264):232-4. PMID: 1997239