Impact of a Diagnostic Stewardship Policy on Laboratory Workload, Antimicrobial Use, and Costs: Withholding Identification and Susceptibility Testing for Contaminant-Suspected Coagulase-negative Staphylococci in Blood Cultures

Main Article Content

Ampai Wangwok
Saowarat Deekae
Aungsana Boonjuab
Sunee Chayangsu
Chawarit Chayangsu

Abstract

Background: Blood culture contamination with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), particularly when positivity occurs in a single bottle, may lead to unnecessary organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (ID/AST), as well as inappropriate antimicrobial use. Implementing diagnostic stewardship by withholding ID/AST for suspected contaminants may reduce laboratory workload and healthcare costs.


Objectives: To compare vancomycin use and evaluate laboratory workload and cost-effectiveness before and after implementation of a policy withholding ID/AST reporting for contaminant-suspected CoNS isolates.


Methods: A retrospective descriptive study with a before-and-after comparison was conducted using data obtained from the clinical microbiology laboratory information system. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, and calculation of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).


Results: Following policy implementation, the proportion of patients receiving vancomycin for single-bottle CoNS isolates decreased significantly from 11.8% to 5.2% (X² = 9.52, p = 0.002). The likelihood of receiving vancomycin was reduced by 54% compared with the pre-implementation period (RR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.31–0.68). Diagnostic costs associated with CoNS identification and susceptibility testing decreased by 75.1%, accompanied by a substantial reduction in laboratory workload. No requests for additional ID/AST testing were reported by treating physicians during the study period.


Conclusions: Withholding ID/AST reporting for contaminant-suspected CoNS is an effective diagnostic stewardship strategy that reduces inappropriate antimicrobial use, laboratory workload, and hospital costs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wangwok, A., Deekae, S., Boonjuab, A., Chayangsu, S., & Chayangsu, C. (2026). Impact of a Diagnostic Stewardship Policy on Laboratory Workload, Antimicrobial Use, and Costs: Withholding Identification and Susceptibility Testing for Contaminant-Suspected Coagulase-negative Staphylococci in Blood Cultures. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 41(2), 393–401. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/280262
Section
Original Articles

References

Yan YZ, Yang HZ, Zhao JX, Xia R. A Quality Control Circle Process to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination Rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40(1):119-20. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.271.

Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19(4):788-802. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-05.

Washer LL, Chenoweth C, Kim HW, Rogers MA, Malani AN, Riddell J 4th, et al. Blood culture contamination: a randomized trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of 3 skin antiseptic interventions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(1):15-21. doi: 10.1086/668777.

Sick-Samuels AC, Woods-Hill CZ, Fackler JC, Tamma PD, Klaus SA, Colantuoni EE, et al. Association of a blood culture utilization intervention on antibiotic use in a pediatric intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40(4):482-4. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.10.

Tamma PD, Miller MA, Cosgrove SE. Rethinking How Antibiotics Are Prescribed: Incorporating the 4 Moments of Antibiotic Decision Making Into Clinical Practice. JAMA 2019;321(2):139-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19509.

Dempsey C, Skoglund E, Muldrew KL, Garey KW. Economic health care costs of blood culture contamination: A systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2019;47(8):963-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.12.020.

Lamy B, Dargère S, Arendrup MC, Parienti JJ, Tattevin P. How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art. Front Microbiol 2016;7:697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00697.

Lueangarun S, Leelarasamee A. Impact of inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy on mortality of septic patients with bacteremia: a retrospective study. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2012;2012:765205. doi: 10.1155/2012/765205.

Lagacé-Wiens PR, Alfa MJ, Manickam K, Harding GK. Reductions in workload and reporting time by use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening with MRSASelect medium compared to mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin. J Clin Microbiol 2008 ;46(4):1174-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01253-07.

Jones BE, Jones MM, Huttner B, Stoddard G, Brown KA, Stevens VW, et al. Trends in Antibiotic Use and Nosocomial Pathogens in Hospitalized Veterans With Pneumonia at 128 Medical Centers, 2006-2010. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61(9):1403-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ629.

Santibañez M, Rincon-Ponte AM, Perez GS. Antimicrobial Stewardship Principles for Critically Ill Patients. AACN Adv Crit Care 2025;36(1):5-13. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2025715.

Wiese-Posselt M, Lâm TT, Schröder C, Schneider S, Kurzai O, Feufel MA, et al. Appropriate antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance: knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of medical students and their needs and preferences for learning. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2023;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01251-x.