Surgical Outcomes of Non-endoscopic Transnasal Dacryocystorhinostomy in Buriram Hospital

Main Article Content

รสนา พิทยพงษ์พัชร์
อุรชา อำไพพิศ

Abstract

Objective: To study the surgical results of non-endoscopic transnasal DCR in Buriram hospital from March 2005 to February 2006.
Methods: Twenty-three operations in fifteen patients' (12 women, 3 men) were included in this retrospective study. The mean age was 49.3 years (range 16-71 years; SD 16.93 years). There were 17 primary DCR, 2 revised DCR after failed external DCR and 4 revised DCR after failed non-endoscopic transnasal DCR. Success was defined as relief of symptoms and anatomical patency, which was assessed by nasolacrimal sac irrigation 6 months after the operations.
Results: The overall surgical success rate were 82.6%. In primary DCR, success rate were 76.5% and in revised DCR were 100%.
Conclusion: Non-endoscopic transnasal DCR is an alternative technique in surgical correction of lower lacrimal system obstruction. Surgical experience and careful patient selection will yield good surgical results.
Keywords: non-endoscopic transnasal DCR, external DCR, surgical outcomes

Article Details

How to Cite
พิทยพงษ์พัชร์ ร., & อำไพพิศ อ. (2019). Surgical Outcomes of Non-endoscopic Transnasal Dacryocystorhinostomy in Buriram Hospital. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 22(1), 161–168. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/208374
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy : surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102:1065-70.

2. Warren JF, Seiff SR, Kavanagh MC. Long-term results of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005 Nov-Dec; 36(6):446-50.

3. Onerci M. Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions. Rhinology. 2002 Jun;40(2):49-65. Review.

4. Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA. Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. I994;i04 (3 pt 1): 269-74.

5. Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1172-6.

6. Gonnering RS, Lyon DB, Fisher JC. Endoscopic laser assisted lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:152-7.

7. Patel BC, Phillips B, McLeish WM, Flaharty P, Anderson RL. Transcana-licular neodymium : YAG laser for revision of dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1191-7.

8. Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, et al. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2369-77.

9. Nimworapun T, Khamapirud B, et al. Surgical outcomes of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Ramathibodi hospital. Thai J Ophthalmol. 2005; 19(1):59-65.

10. Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystor-hinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;20(1):50-6.

11. Iliff CE. A simplified dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85:586-91.

12. Becker BB. Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988; 19:419-27.

13. Kunavisarut S, Phonglertnapagorn S. Dacryocystorhinostomy at Ramathibodi hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. I990 Jan;73:47-52.

14. Tripathi A, Lesser TH, O’Donnell NP, White S. Local anaesthetic endonasal endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of patients’ acceptability and various factors affecting the success of this procedure. Eye. 2002 Mar; 16(2): 146-9.

15. Walland MJ, Rose GE. Factors affecting the success rate of open lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Dec;78(12):888-91.