Narrow DCP Comparison of The Union Time of Tibial Shaft Fracture Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Between 4 Screws and 8 Screws on Narrow DCP
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background : Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) becomes international standard technique for the airway management in the emergency department (ED). Surin hospital had adopted using RSI in ED. The purpose of this study is to compare the first-pass intubation success between the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) and the conventional endotracheal intubation.
Methods : A retrospective observational study was conducted.Data was collected from medical record and document of patients aged over fifteen years old who underwent intubation at emergency department of Surin hospital during November 1st 2019 to April 30th 2020.
Results : There were 64 patients underwent intubation at ED during study period totally. In which 33 cased (51.6%) underwent rapid sequence intubations and 31 cases (48.4%) underwent conventional endotracheal intubations. The first-pass success intubation rate from RSI technique was 78.8% compared to 77.4% of the conventional endotracheal intubation technique. There was no significantly difference in the first-pass success intubation rate and complication between the two groups. Nevertheless, the first-pass intubation success rate which operated by emergency physicians was significantly different from 6th year medical student (p=0.021). Adverse events found in this study were hypoxia, hypotension and dental trauma. In addition, hypoxia and hypotension incidence of RSI group was higher than those of conventional endotracheal intubation but not significantly different.
Conclusion : In this study, there was no significant differences in the first-pass success intubation and complications between rapid sequence intubation (RSI) group and conventional endotracheal intubation group. However, rate of the first-pass success intubation depended on proficiency of physicians who performed intubation procedure. The emergency physician had significant higher successful first attempt intubation rate than those of 6th year medical student.
Keywords : Rapid sequence intubation (RSI)
Article Details
References
Grounds RM, Twigley AJ, Carli F, Whitwam JG, Morgan M. The haemodynamic effects of intravenous induction. Comparison of the effects of thiopentone and propofol. Anaesthesia 1985;40(8):735-40.
Okubo M, Gibo K, Hagiwara Y, Nakayama Y, Hasegawa K. The effectiveness of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) versus non-RSI in emergency department: an analysis of multicenter prospective observational study. Int J Emerg Med 2017;10(1):1.
Brown CA 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Walls RM. NEAR III Investigators. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations Ann Emerg Med 2015;65(4):363-370.e1.
Kim JH, Kim YM, Choi HJ, Je SM, Kim E. Korean Emergency Airway Management Registry (KEAMR) Investigators. Factors associated with successful second and third intubation attempts in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31(9):1376-81.
Sagarin MJ, Barton ED, Chng YM, Walls RM; National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators. Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46(4):328-36.
Sakles JC, Laurin EG, Rantapaa AA, Panacek EA. Airway management in the emergency department : a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31(3):325-32.
Simpson J, Munro PT, Graham CA. Rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: 5 year trends. Emerg Med J 2006;23(1):54-6.
Tayal VS, Riggs RW, Marx JA, Tomaszewski CA, Schneider RE. Rapid-sequence intubation at an emergency medicine residency: success rate and adverse events during a two-year period. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6(1):31-7.
Walls RM, Brown CA 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ; NEAR II Investigators. Emergency airway management: a multi-center report of 8937 emergency department intubations. J Emerg Med 2011;41(4):347-54.
Li J, Murphy-Lavoie H, Bugas c, Martinez J, Preston c. Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17(2):141-3.
Bozeman WP, Kleiner DM, Fluggett V. A comparison of rapid-sequence intubation and etomidate-only intubation in the prehospital air medical setting. Prehosp Emerg Care 2006;10(1):8-13.
Kim C, Kang HG, Lim TH, Choi BY, Shin YJ, Choi HJ.What factors affect the success rate of the first attempt at endotracheal intubation in emergency, departments? Emerg Med J 2013;30(11):888-92.
Wongyingsinn M, Surabenjawong UA. Prospective Controlled of the Rapid Sequence Intubation Technique in the Emergency Department of a University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2017;100(9):953.
Choi YF, Wong TW, Lau CC, Siu AYC, Lo CB, Yuen MC, et al. A study of Orotracheal Intubation in Emergency Departments of Five District Hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong j emerg Med 2003;10(3):138-45.
สกล เฮดดิการ์ด. การใส่ท่อหายใจในแผนกฉุกเฉิน โรงพยาบาลลำปางและโรงพยาบาลแพร่. ลำปางเวชสาร 2555;33(2):103-14.
Levitan RM, Rosenblatt B, Meiner EM, Reilly PM, Hollander JE. Alternating day emergency medicine and anesthesia resident responsibility for management of the trauma airway: a study of laryngoscopy perfor mance and intubation success. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43(1):48-53.
Barton ED., Swanson ER., Hutton KC. Success and failure rates of rapid sequence intubation versus non-rapid sequence intubation by air medical providers in 2,853 patients. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44(4 S):S65.
Falcone RE, Herron H, Dean B, Werman H. Emergency scene endotracheal intubation before and after the introduction of a rapid sequence induction protocol. Air Med J 1996;15(4):163-7.
ภุมรินทร์ แซ่ลิ่ม, ประสิทธิ์ วุฒิสุทธิเมธาวี, วีรัตน์ วศินวงศ์. การศึกษานำร่อง เปรียบเทียบวิธีใส่ท่อทางเดินหายใจ แบบรวดเร็วโดยใช้ยานำสลบและยาคลายกล้ามเนื้อ กับวิธีใส่ท่อทางเดินหายใจ แบบไม่ใช้ยาคลายกล้ามเนื้อ ในแผนกฉุกเฉิน โรงพยาบาลสงขลานครินทร์. สงขลานครินทร์เวชสาร 2553;28(6):317-27.
Lin CC, Chen KF, Shih CP, Seak A, Hsu KH. The prognostic factors of hypotension after rapid sequence intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26(8):845-51.